Nodal Spine Pairs Present in the Mimosoid <i>Prosopis juliflora</i> Are Not Stipules but Define a Distinct Class of Lateral Organs
- 1 National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), New Delhi, India.
- 2 National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), New Delhi, India.
Abstract
The descriptions of Prosopis juliflora of subfamily mimosoideae in the family leguminosae, given in the floras of arid and semi-arid regions of the world, including the flora of Delhi, state that the spine pairs seen in association with compound leaf on nodes are stipules. The suggestions that spines are stipules were tested by morphological and histological examination of nodes of P. juliflora plants growing in the Arawalli range at New Delhi. The nascent nodes on growing branches of P. juliflora were observed to produce a pair of knife-like free bifacial stipules together with a leaf and a pair of spines. The stipules were missing from the mature nodes of the same branches whose young nodes carried stipule pairs, suggesting that the stipules were deciduous whereas leaves and spines were persistent. Anatomically, spines were observed to be appendages to stem and located adjacent to leaf petiole away from stipules. Vasculature of stipules was independent. The observations allowed the conclusion that P. juliflora nodes form regular stipules and spines produced on them are stem-like distinct lateral organs. It is suggested that nodal spine pairs borne on plant nodes in general are lateral organs different from stipules, leaves and secondary inflorescences.
- R. Sattler and R. Rutishauser, “The Fundamental Relevance of Morphology and Morphogenesis to Plant Research,” Annals of Botany, Vol. 80, No. 5, 1997, pp. 571-582. doi:10.1006/anbo.1997.0474
- A. Cronquist, “The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants,” The New York Botanical Garden Press, New York, 1988.
- A. A. Tyler, “The Nature and Origin of Stipules,” Annals of the New York Academy of Science, Vol. 10, No. 1, 1897, pp. 1-49. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1897.tb54954.x
- E. W. Sinnott and I. W. Bailey, “Investigations on the Phylogeny of Angiosperms. 3. Nodal Anatomy and the Morphology of Stipules,” American Journal of Botany, Vol. 1, No. 9, 1914, pp. 441-453. doi:10.2307/2435043
- C. W. Gourlay, J. M. I. Hofer and T. H. N. Ellis, “Pea Compound Leaf Architecture Is Regulated by Interactions among the Genes UNIFOLIATA, COCHLETA, AFILA and TENDRIL-LESS,” Plant Cell, Vol. 12, No. 8, 2000, pp. 1279-1294.
- J. L. Yaxley, W. Jablonski and J. B. Reid, “Leaf and Flower Development in Pea (Pisum sativum L.): Mutants cochleata and unifoliata,” Annals of Botany, Vol. 88, No. 2, 2001, pp. 225-234. doi:10.1006/anbo.2001.1448
- S. Kumar, R. K. Mishra, A. Kumar, S. Srivastava and S. Chaudhary, “Regulation of Stipule Development by COCHLEATA and STIPULE-REDUCED Genes in Pea (Pisum sativum),” Planta, Vol. 230, No. 3, 2009, pp. 449-458. doi:10.1007/s00425-009-0952-0
- V. Sharma, A. K. Sinha, S. Chaudhary, A. Priyadarshini, B. N. Tripathi and S. Kumar, “Genetic Analysis of Structure and Function of Stipules in Pea Pisum sativum,” Proceedings of Indian National Science Academy, Vol. 78, No. 1, 2012, pp. 9-34.
- V. Sharma, B. N. Tripathi and S. Kumar, “Organ-Wise Homologies of Stipule, Leaf and Inflorescence between Pisum sativum Genetic Variants, Delonix regia and Caesalpinia bonduc Indicate Parallel Evolution of Morphogenetic Regulation,” Plant Systematics and Evolution, Vol. 298, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1167-1175. doi:10.1007/s00606-012-0612-x
- A. Kumar, V. Sharma, M. Khan, B. N. Tripathi and S. Kumar, “Pisum sativum Wild-Type and Mutant Stipules and Those Induced by an Auxin Transport Inhibitor Demonstrate the Entire Diversity of Laminated Stipules Observed in Angiosperms,” Protoplasma, 2012, (Published online). doi:10.1007/s00709-012-0397-3
- D. B. Wake, M. H. Wake and C. D. Specht, “Homoplasy: From Detecting Pattern to Determining Process and Mechanism of Evolution,” Science, Vol. 331, No. 6020, 2011, pp. 1032-1035. doi:10.1126/science.1188545