Nature of Gene Action and Maternal Effects for Pod Borer, <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> Resistance and Grain Yield in Chickpea, <i>Cicer arietinum</i> — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Nature of Gene Action and Maternal Effects for Pod Borer, <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> Resistance and Grain Yield in Chickpea, <i>Cicer arietinum</i>
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
,
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
,
Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India
,
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
,
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
1 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
2 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
3 Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India
4 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
5 International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, India
Information on mechanisms and inheritance of resistance is critical to plan an effective strategy to breed for resistance to insect pests. Therefore, we evaluated a diverse array of chickpea genotypes (eight desi and one kabuli) with varying levels of resistance to the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera to gain an understanding of the nature of gene action and possible maternal effects. The test genotypes were crossed in all possible combinations for a full diallel. The 72 F 1 s (36 direct and 36 reciprocal crosses) along with the parents were evaluated for resistance to H. armige ra under field conditions, and for antibiosis mechanism of resistance (larval survival and larval weight gain) by using detached leaf assay under laboratory conditions, and grain yield under un-protected conditions in the field. Additive gene action governed the inheritance of resistance to H. armigera , while non-additive type of gene action was predominant for inheritance of antibiosis component of resistance (larval survival and larval weight) and grain yield. Greater magnitude of σ 2 A(17.39 and 1.42) than σ 2 D (3.93 and 1.21) indicated the preponderance of σ 2 Ain inheritance of resistance to pod borer, H. armigera under laboratory and field conditions, respectively. There were no maternal effects for inheritance of resistance to pod borer and grain yield. Lines with significant gca effects for pod borer damage and grain yield were identified for further use in the resistance breeding program. The implications of the inheritance pattern of pod borer resistance and grain yield are discussed in the context of strategies to enhance pod borer resistance and grain yield in chickpea.
KeywordsChickpeaPod Borer<i>Helicoverpa armigera</i>Gene ActionAntibiosisMaternal EffectsCombining AbilityInheritance of Resistance
P. S. Birthal, P. P. Rao, M. C. S. Mantilan and S. Bhagavabatula, “Groundnut and Soybean Economics in Asia: Facts, Trends and Outlook,” Internationl Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (CRISAT), Patancheru, 2010, p. 86.
FAO, “FAO Bulletin of Statistics,” Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, 2010.
P. Parthasarthy Rao, S. N. Nigam, M. C. S. Bntilan, S. Bhagavabatula and M. C. S. Mantilan, “Chickpea and Pigeonpea Economics in Asia: Facts, Trends and Outlook,” International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, 2010.
M. Ali and H. A. Shivkumar, “Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Research in India: Accomplishments and Future Strategies,” Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2005, pp. 125-133.
J. Singh, A. S. Sidhu and B. S. Kooner, “Incidence of Heliothis armigera in Relation to Phenology of Chickpeas,” Journal of Research—Punjab Agricultural University, Vol. 22, No. 2, 1985, pp. 291-297.
ICRISAT, “The Medium Term Plan,” AInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, 1992.
J. N. Sachan and G. Katti, “Integrated Pest Management,” Souvenir: 25 Years of Research on Pulses in India, International Symposium on Pulses Research, New Delhi, 2-6 April 1994, pp. 23-26.
W. J. Armes, D. R. Jadhav and K. R. Desuza, “A Survey of Insecticide Resistance in H. armigera in Indian Subcontinent,” Bulletin of Entomological Research, Vol. 86, No. 5, 1996, pp. 499-514. doi:10.1017/S0007485300039298
H. C. Sharma, B. U. Singh, K. V. Hariprasad and P. J. Bramel-Cox, “Host-Plant Resistance to Insects in Integrated Pest Management for a Safer Environment,” Proceedings, Academy of Environmental Biology, Vol. 8, No. 1, 1999, pp. 113-136.
R. A. Robinson, “Return to Resistance: Breeding Crops to Reduce Pesticide Dependence,” Ag Access, California, 1996.
H. C. Sharma, “Heliothis/Helicoverpa Management: Emerging Trends and Strategies for Future Research,” Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, 2005.
K. S. Chabhra, B. S. Kooner, A. K. Sharma and A. K. Saxena, “Sources of Resistance in Chickpea, Role of Biochemical Components on the Incidence of Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner),” Indian Journal of Entomology, Vol. 52, No. 3, 1990, pp. 423-430.
C. A. R. Dias, S. S. Lal and C. P. Yadava, “Differences in Susceptibility of Certain Chickpea Cultivars and Local Collection to Heliothis armigera (Hubner),” Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Vol. 53, No. 9, 1983, pp. 842-845.
C. L. L. Gowda, S. Ramesh, S. Chandra and H. D. Upadhyaya, “Genetic Basis of Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera) Resistance and Grain Yield in Desi and Kabuli Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Un-Protected Conditions,” Euphytica, Vol. 145, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 199- 124.
S. S. Lateef, “Gram Pod Borer, Heliothis armigera (Hub.) Resistance in Chickpea,” Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 14, No. 1-2, 1985, pp. 95-102. doi:10.1016/0167-8809(85)90087-8
S. S. Lateef and J. N. Sachan, “Host Plant Resistance of Helicoverpa armigera in Different Agro-Ecological Contexts,” Chickpea in Nineties, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Chickpea, Patancheru, 4-8 December 1989, pp. 181-189.
N. J. Bhatt and R. K. Patel, “Screening of Chickpea Cultivars for Their Resistance to Gram Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera,” Indian Journal of Entomology, Vol. 63, No. 3, 2001, pp. 277-280.
E. Sreelatha, C. L. L. Gowda, T. B. Gaur, H. C. Sharma, S. Ramesh and H. D. Upadhyaya, “Genetic Analysis of Pod Borer (Helicoverpa armigera) Resistance and Grain Yield in Desi and Kabuli Chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) under Unprotected Conditions,” Indian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 68, No. 4, 2007, pp. 406-413.
V. Arunachalam, “Evaluation of Diallel Crosses by Graphical and Combining Ability Methods,” Indian Journal of Genetics Vol. 36, No. 3, 1976, pp. 358-366.
B. R. Christie and Shattuck, “The Diallel Cross: Design, Analysis, and Use for Plant Breeders,” Plant Breeding Reviews, Vol. 9, 1992, pp. 9-36.
B. Griffing, “Concept of General and Specific Combining Ability in Relation to Diallel Crossing Systems,” Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 4, 1956, pp. 463-493.
R. P. Dua, C. L. L. Gowda, H. A. Shiv Kumar, K. B. Saxena, J. N. Govil, B. B. Singh, K. K. Singh, R. P. Singh, V. P. Singh and S. Kranthi, “Breeding for Resistance to Helicoverpa: Effectiveness and Limitations,” In: H. C. Sharma, Ed., Heliothis/Helicoverpa Management: Emerging Trends and Strategies for Future Research, Oxford & IBH Publishing, New Delhi, 2005, pp. 307-328.
V. L. Narayanamma, H. C. Sharma, C. L. L. Gowda and M. Sriramulu, “Mechanisms of Resistance to Heli-coverpa armigera and Introgression of Resistance Genes into F1 Hybrids in Chickpea,” Arthropod Plant Interactions, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2007, pp. 263-270. doi:10.1007/s11829-007-9025-0
N. W. Simmonds, “Principles of Crop Improvement,” Longman Group Limited, London, 1979, pp. 115-116.
O. Kempthorne, “An Introduction to Genetic Statistics,” John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1957.
C. L. L. Gowda, S. S. Lateef, J. B. Smithson and W. Reed, “Breeding for Resistance to Heliothis armigera in Chickpea,” Proceedings of the National Seminar on Breeding Crop Plants for Resistance to Pests and Diseases, Coimbatore, 25-27 May 1983, pp. 223-242.
O. Singh, C. L. L. Gowda, S. C. Sethi and S. S. Lateef, “Inheritance of and Breeding for Resistance to Helicoverpa armigera Pod Borer in Chickpea,” Golden Jubilee Symposium of Indian Society of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 4-8 February 1991, New Delhi.
P. M. Salimath, S. C. Shahapur, H. G. Nijagun, S. T. Khajjidoni, R. L. Ravi Kumar and B. S. Patil, “Genetic Analysis of Pod Borer Tolerance and Malic Acid Content in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” In: R. N. Sharma, G. K. Shrivastava, A. L. Rathore, M. L. Sharma and M. A. Khan, Eds., Chickpea Research for the Millennium, Proceedings of the International Chickpea Conference, Raipur, 20-22 January 2003, pp. 81-85.
O. Singh and R. S. Paroda, “A Comparative Analysis of Combining Ability and Heterosis in Irradiated and Non-Irradiated Diallel Populations of Chickpea,” Indian Journal of Pulses Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, 1989, pp. 1-9.
V. Arunachalam, “Plant Breeding—By Design or Default? In: Breeding Strategies for 21st Century,” Proceedings of the 1st National Plant Breeding Congress, Coimbatore, 1-3 July 1998, pp. 52-67.
D. G. Langham, “The High-Low Method in Crop Improvement,” Crop Science, Vol. 1, No. 5, 1961, pp. 376-378. doi:10.2135/cropsci1961.0011183X000100050026x
H. C. Sharma, C. L. L. Gowda, K. K. Sharma, P. M. Gaur, N. Malli-karjuna, H. K. Bouhariwalla and J. H. Crouch, “Host Plant Resistance to Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera in Chickpea,” Research for the Millennium: Proceedings of the International Chickpea Conference, Raipur, 20-22 January 2003, pp. 118-137.
O. Singh, S. C. Sethi, S. S. Lateef and C. L. L. Gowda, “Registration of ICCV 7 Chickpea Germplasm,” Crop Science, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1997, p. 295. doi:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010068x
N. Kampli, P. M. Salimath and S. T. Kajjidoni, “Genetic Variability Created through Biparental Mating in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Indian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2002, pp. 128-130.
N. Kampli, P. M. Salimath, S. T. Kajjidoni and R. L. Ravikumar, “Effects of Intermating in Early Segregating Generations on Character Association in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Indian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 62, No. 3, 2002, pp. 259-260.
E. Sreelatha, T. B. Gour, C. L. L. Gowda, M. A. Ghaffar and H. C. Sharma, “Stability of Resistance to Helicoverpa armigera in Chickpea,” In: R. N. Sharma, G. K. Shrivastava, A. L. Rathore, M. L. Sharma and M. A. Khan, Eds., Chickpea Research for the Millennium: Proceedings of the International Chickpea Conference, Raipur, 20-22 January 2003, pp. 138-142.
R. B. Deshmukh and V. J. Patil, “Genetic Architecture of Yield and Its Components in Chickpea,” Legume Research, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1995, pp. 85-88.
D. D. Bhatt and D. P. Singh, “Combining Ability in Chickpea,” Indian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 40, No. 2, 1980, pp. 456-460.
S. D. Ugale, “Incorporation of Germplasm from Kabuli to Desi Cultivars and Vice-Versa in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 1980.
R. P. Katiyar and Solanki, “Combining Ability and Gene Action for Yield and Its Component Traits in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Proceedings, XV International Congress of Genetics, New Delhi, 1983.
K. P. Singh and J. S. Sidhu, “Gene Action for Harvest Index and Grain Yield in Chickpea,” Proceedings, XVth International Congress of Genetics, New Delhi, 1983.
B. A. Kunadia, M. V. Kukadia and A. R. Pathak, “Graphical Diallel Analysis in Kabuli Gram,” Gujarat Agricultural University Research Journal, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1986, pp. 71-76.
N. V. Shinde, “Studies on Inheritance of Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri, Grain Yield and Its Components in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Ph.D. Thesis, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vishva Vidalaya, Rahuri, 1988.
M. A. K. Miah and P. N. Bahl, “Genetic Divergence and Hybrid Performance in Chickpea,” Indian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1989, pp. 119-124.
C. L. L. Gowda, “Genetic Analyses of Yield Components in Bengal Gram (Cicer arietinum L.),” Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, 1975.
B. M. Asawa and A. S. Tewari, “Analysis of Genetic Architecture in Segregating Population of Gram (Cicer arietinum L.),” Zeitschrift Pflanzenzuchtung, Vol. 77, No. 3, 1976, pp. 251-256.
T. S. Sandhu, H. S. Brar and B. S. Arora, “Combining Ability from Diallel Cross of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” Crop Improvement, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1977, pp. 11-17.
C. L. L. Gowda and P. N. Bahl, “Combining Ability in Chickpea,” Indian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1978, pp. 245-251.
O. Singh, C. L. L. Gowda, S. C. Sethi, T. Dasgupta and J. B. Smithson, “Genetic Analysis of Agronomic Characters in Chickpea. I. Estimates of Genetic Variances from Diallel Mating Designs,” Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Vol. 83, No. 8, 1992, pp. 956-962.
K. B. Singh and B. Ocampo, “Interspecific Hybridization in Annual Cicer Species,” Indian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 47, No. 3, 1993, pp. 199-204.
B. S. Annigeri, P. M. Salimath, S. J. Patil and B. H. Venkataswamy, “Genetic Analysis to Identify Potential Parents and Crosses for Yield Improvement in Chickpea,” Indian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 56, No. 1, 1996, pp. 114-116.
N. D. Sarode, “Diallel Analysis in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.),” M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vishva Vidalaya, Rahuri, 1997.
V. S. Girase, “Genetic Architecture, Transgressive Segregation and Inheritance of Resistance to Wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f sp. ciceri),” Ph.D Thesis, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vishva Vidalaya, Rahuri, 1999.
C. E. Cress, “Heterosis of the Hybrid Related to Gene Frequency Differences between Populations,” Genetics, Vol. 53, No. 2, 1966, pp. 269-274.
K. Mather and J. L. Jinks, “Biometrical Genetics—The Study of Continuous Variation,”3rd Edition, Chapman and Hall, London, 1982.
M. T. Clegg, R. W. Allard and A. L. Kahiar, “Is the Gene Unit of Selection? Evidence from Two Experimental Plant Populations,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, Vol. 69, No. 9, 1972, pp. 2474-2478. doi:10.1073/pnas.69.9.2474
V. S. Girase, R. B. Deshmukh and J. V. Patil, “Genetic Architecture for Grain Yield and Its Components in Chickpea—A Review,” Journal of Maharashtra Agricultural Universities, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2002, pp. 22-25.
K. B. Singh, “Exploitation of Heterosis in Pulse Crops,” Indian Journal of Genetics, Vol. 34A, 1974, pp. 752-756.
H. C. Sharma and J. H. Crouch, “Molecular Marker Assisted Selection: A Novel Approach for Host Plant Resistance to Insects in Grain Legumes,” Pulses in New Perspective, Proceedings of the National Symposium on Crop Diversification and Natural Resource Management, Kanpur, 20-22 December 2004, pp. 147-174.
H. C. Sharma, V. Rajeev, P. M. Gaur and C. L. L. Gowda, “Potential for Using Morphological, Biochemical, and Molecular Markers for Resistance to Insect Pests in Grain Legumes,” Journal of Food Legumes, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2007, pp. 211-217.