Screening Test for Antibiotics in Medicinal Plants (STAMP): Using Powdered Plant Materials Instead of Extracts
- 1 Departamento de Produ??o Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências Agron?micas, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Botucatu, Brasil
- 2 Departamento de Puericultura e Pediatria, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeir?o Preto, Universidade de S?o Paulo, Ribeir?o Preto, Brasil
- 3 Departamento de Química Organica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Araraquara, Brasil
- 4 Departamento de Química Organica, Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Araraquara, Brasil
- 5 Unidade de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Ribeir?o Preto, Ribeir?o Preto, Brasil
- 6 Unidade de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Ribeir?o Preto, Ribeir?o Preto, Brasil
- 7 Unidade de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Ribeir?o Preto, Ribeir?o Preto, Brasil
- 8 4Unidade de Biotecnologia, Universidade de Ribeir?o Preto, Ribeir?o Preto, Brasil
Abstract
Plants are a rich source of antibiotics, but screening all the existing plant species for biological activity using current methods can be time and resource consuming. The present study is to investigate whether powdered plant materials would perform as well as plant extracts in the screening of plants with antimicrobial activity. In the new method proposed (STAMP), we compared in vitro antimicrobial activity of powdered plant materials from 12 species against bacteria and fungi. We confirmed these results with their corresponding aqueous (wet) and hydro-alcoholic extracts and one species testing the antimicrobial activity of two isolated compounds. Compared with hydro-alcoholic extracts, screening using the powdered plant materials correctly identified the majority of the species with antimicrobial activity against Candida albicans (sensitivity 91%, specificity 86%), C. parapsilosis (sensitivity 100%, specificity 67%), and Staphylococcus aureus (sensitivity 64%, specificity 86%). For bacteria, the method performed better in a pH of 9.0. The antimicrobial activity of two compounds isolated from one species (maytenin and netzahualcoyone) confirmed the results. In conclusion, the use of powdered plant materials for screening plants with antimicrobial properties is a cheap, widely available, technically easy, time sparing, reproducible, and sensitive method and can significantly shorten the time and money spent during drug development.
- F. Carmona, S. I. Prado, M. F. I. Silva, G. G. Gaspar, F. Bellissimo-Rodrigues, R. Martinez, A. K. Matsuno and A. P. Carlotti, “Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Outbreak in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Report of Successful Interventions for Control and Prevention,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2012, pp. 158-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-879X2012007500005
- Y, Miyasaki, W. S. Nichols, M. A. Morgan, J. A. Kwan, M. M. Van Benschoten, P. E. Kittell and W. D. Hardy, “Screening of Herbal Extracts against Multi-Drug Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii,” Phytotherapy Research, Vol. 24, No. 8, 2010, pp. 1202-1206.
- M. W. Harding, L. L. R. Marques, R. J. Howard and M. E. Olson, “Can Filamentous Fungi Form Biofilms?” Trends in Microbiology, Vol. 17, No. 11, 2009, pp. 475-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2009.08.007
- W. M. Dunne, “Bacterial Adhesion: Seen Any Good Biofilms Lately?” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2002, pp. 155-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.15.2.155-166.2002
- A. Coates, Y. Hu, R. Bax and C. Page, “The Future Challenges Facing the Development of New Antimicrobial Drugs,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, Vol. 1, No. 11, 2002, pp. 895-910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrd940
- H. W. Boucher, G. H. Talbot, J. S. Bradley, J. E. Edwards, D. Gilbert, L. B. Rice, M. Scheld, B. Spellberg and J. Bartlett, “Bad Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE! An Update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/595011
- K. W. Martin and E. Ernst, “Herbal Medicines for Treatment of Bacterial Infections: A Review of Controlled Clinical Trials,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, Vol. 51, No. 2. 2003, pp. 241-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkg087
- M. R. S. Zaidan, A. Noor Rain, A. R. Badrul, A. Adlin, A. Norazah and I. Zakiah, “In Vitro Screening of Five Local Medicinal Plants for Antibacterial Activity Using Disc Diffusion Method,” Trop Biomed, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2005, pp. 165-170.
- A. J. Paton, N. A. Brummitt, R. Govaerts, K. Harman, S. Hinchcliffe, B. Allkin and E. N. Lughadha, “Towards Target 1 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation: A Working List of All Known Plant Species—Progress and Prospects,” Taxon, Vol. 57, No. 2, 2008, pp. 602-611.
- J. Corsino, P. R. de Carvalho, M. J. Kato, L. R. Latorre, O. M. Oliveira, A. R. Araujo, V. S Bolzani, S. C. Franca, A. M. S. Pereira and M. Furlan, “Biosynthesis of Friedelane and Quinonemethide Triterpenoids Is Compartmentalized in Maytenus aquifolium and Salacia campestris,” Phytochemistry, Vol. 55, No. 7, 2000, pp. 741-748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00285-5