Growth and Biomass Allocation of <i>Muhlenbergia schreberi</i>
- 1 Federal Technologic University of Paraná, UTFPR, Dois Vizinhos, Brazil
- 2 Federal Technologic University of Paraná, UTFPR, Dois Vizinhos, Brazil
- 3 University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA
- 4 Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
Abstract
The main goal of this research was to evaluate the growth of nimblewill ( Muhlenbergia schreberi ), an emerging threat to forage grass. Our initial experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design, with 17 treatments ( i.e. , weeks) and 4 repetitions. Seventeen growth evaluations ( i.e. , treatments) were carried out every 7 days, totaling a 119-day cycle, followed by an analysis of the variables such as stolon number, length, number of leaves, dry matter, biological productivity, growth rate, and relative growth rate. A second experiment was conducted over a 5-week period to compare the growth variable between nimblewill plants and pastures. For all variables, the results showed that the weed grass developed slowly within the first 5 weeks after germination, indicating that this would be the best time to implement a chemical or cultural control measure. It was also observed that cultures with a rapid growth in the first 5 weeks after emergence could easily suppress weed growth. At the end of the experiment, stabilization of all variables was observed. However, additional observations are required to obtain more accurate results.
- Radosevich, S.R. (1987) Methods to Study Interactions among Crops and Weeds. Weed Technology, 1, 190-198.
- Baskin, J.M. and Baskin, C.C. (1985) Dormancy Breaking and Germination Requirements of Nimblewill (Muhlenbergia schreberi Gmel.) Seeds. Journal Range Manage, 38, 513-515. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3899742
- Willis, J.B., Beam, J.B., Whitney, L.B., Shawn, D.A. and McErroy, J.S. (2007) Selective Nimblewill (Muhlenbergia schreberi) Control in Cool-Season Turfgrass. Weed Technology, 21, 886-889. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-07-016.1
- Ravindra, G.M., Sridhara, S., Girijesh, G.K. and Nanjappa, H.V. (2008) Weed Biology and Growth Analysis of Celosia argentea L., a Weed Associated with Groundnut and Finger Millet Crops in Southern India. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science, 2, 80-87.
- Radosevich, S., Holt, J.S. and Ghersa, C. (1997) Weed Ecology: Implications for Vegetation Management. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 278-301.
- Horack, M.J. and Loughin, T.M. (2003) Growth Analysis of four Amaranthus Species. Weed Science, 48, 347-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0347:GAOFAS]2.0.CO;2
- Salehian, H. and Eshaghi, O. (2012) Growth Analysis Some Weed Species. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 4, 730-734.
- Garnier, E. (1992) Growth Analysis of Congeneric Annual and Perennial Grass Species. Journal of Ecology, 80, 665-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2260858
- Hunt, R. (1982) Plant Growth Curves: The Functional Approach to Plant Growth Analysis. Edward Arnold, London.
- Tekalign, T. and Hammes, P.S. (2005) Growth and Productivity of Potato as Influenced by Cultivar and Reproductive Growth II. Growth Analysis, Tuber Yield and Quality. Scientia Horticulturae, 105, 29-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.021
- Salisbury, F.B. and Ross, C.W. (1992) Plant Physiology, Hormones and Plant Regulators: Auxins and Gibberellins. 4th Edition, Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, 357-381.
- Willians, R.F. (1946) The Physiology of Plant Growth with Special Reference to the Concept of Net Assimilation Rate. Annals of Botany, 32, 41-72.
- Lambers, H., Chapin III, F.S. and Pons, T.L. (2008) Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer, New York, 321-374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78341-3_10
- Quero, J.L., Villar, R., Maran, T., Zamora, R. and Poorter, L. (2007) Seed-Mass Effects in four Mediterranean Quercus Species (Fagaceae) Growing in Contrasting Light Environments. American Journal of Botany, 94, 1795-1803. http://dx.doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.11.1795