Kudzu Forage Quality Evaluation as an Animal Feed Source
- 1 Biology Department, Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, USA
- 2 Biology Department, Jacksonville State University, Jacksonville, USA
Abstract
The nutritional value of kudzu ( Pueraria lobata ) was evaluated as a potential animal feed. Randomly selected samples from natural habitats with Jacksonville area (Alabama, USA) were utilized in the study. Kudzu leaves showed significantly higher dry matter and crude protein content than the stems; whereas, ADF fiber was significantly lower in the leaves. However, NDF and total digestible nutrients (TDN) were similar in the leaves and the stems. The leaf part of kudzu was especially rich in CP (24.46%) and met the requirements and recommendations for most ruminants. The TDN value for kudzu stem is 55.99%, which falls below but within the recommended range. Macronutrients concentration between the stem and leaf of kudzu, nitrogen, calcium, and magnesium showed a significantly higher in the leaf than the stem. However, phosphorous was similar in concentration in the stem and the leaf, and potassium was higher in the stem. In regard to the micronutrients, the only significant difference between the leaf and the stem was iron. However, iron, manganese, zinc, and copper were all above the recommended concentrations by the National Research Council. In general, kudzu can be considered a good source for animal feed, especially the leaf, which shows a higher value in most of the determined criteria in comparison to what was recommended by the National Research Council. This should provide a new outlook to kudzu, which has been considered a noxious weed and help in the utilization of kudzu in a positive way in the southern region of the US.
- Pierre, W.H. and Bertram, F.E. (1929) Kudzu Production with Special Response to Influence of Frequency of Cutting on Yields and Formation of Root Reserves. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy, 21, 1079-1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1929.00021962002100110007x
- Forseth, I.N. and Teramura, A.H. (1987) Field Photosynthesis, Microclimate and Water Relations of an Exotic Temperate Liana, Pueraria lobata, Kudzu. Oecologia, 71, 262-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00377293
- Sasek, T.W. and Strain, B.R. (1988) Effects of Carbon Dioxide Enrichment on the Growth and Morphology of Kudzu (Pueraria lobata). Weed Science, 36, 28-36.
- Schnoor, J.L., Licht, L.A., McCutcheon, S.C., Wolfe, N.L. and Carreira, L.H. (1995) Phytoremediation of Organic and Nutrient Contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, 29, 318A-323A. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es00007a747
- Lynd, I.Q. and Ansman, T.R. (1990) Exceptional Forage Regrowth, Nodulation and Nitrogenase Activity of Kudzu (Pueraria lobata (Willd.) Ohivi) Grown in Eroded Dougherty Loam Subsoil. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 13, 861-885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904169009364122
- Tsugawa, H. (1986) Cultivation and Utilization of Kudzu-Vine (Pueraria lobata Ohwi). Journal of Japanese Grassland Science, 32, 173-183.
- Corley, R.N., Woldeghebriel, A. and Murphy, M.R. (1997) Evaluation of the Nutritive Value of Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) as a Feed for Ruminants. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 68, 183-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(97)00038-2
- Terrill, T.H., Gelaye, S., Mahotiere, S., Amoah, E.A., Miller, S. and Windham, W.R. (2003) Effect of Cutting Date and Frequency on Yield and Quality of Kudzu in the Southern United States. Grass and Forage Science, 58, 178-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2003.00369.x
- Sturkie, D.C. and Grimes, J.C. (1939) Kudzu; Its Value and Use in Alabama. Agricultural Experiment Station of the Alabama Polytechnic Institute, Circular, 83, 1-20.
- Sage, R.F., Coiner, H.A., Way, D.A., Runion, G.B., Prior, S.A., Torbert, H.A., Sicher, R. and Ziska, L. (2009) Kudzu (Pueraria montana (Lour.) Merr. Variety Lobata): A New Source of Carbohydrate for Bioethanol Production. Biomass & Bioenergy, 33, 57-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.04.011
- Hue, N.V. and Evans, C.E. (1986) Procedures Used for Soil and Plant Analysis by the Auburn University Soil Testing Laboratory. Department of Agronomy and Soil Publication Series 106.