Spectral Discrimination of Two Pigweeds from Cotton with Different Leaf Colors
- 1 Crop Production Systems Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, USA
- 2 Crop Production Systems Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, USA
- 3 Crop Genetics Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Stoneville, USA
Abstract
To implement strategies to control Palmer amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) and redroot pigweed ( Amaranthus retroflexus L.) infestations in cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) production systems, managers need effective techniques to identify the weeds. Leaf light reflectance measurements have shown promise as a tool to distinguish crops from weeds. Studies have targeted plants with green leaves. This study focused on using leaf hyperspectral reflectance data to develop spectral profiles of Palmer amaranth, redroot pigweed, and cotton and to determine regions of the light spectrum most sensitive for pigweed and cotton discrimination. The study focused on cotton near-isogenic lines created to have bronze, green, or yellow colored leaves. Reflectance measurements within the 400 to 2500 nm spectral range were obtained from cotton and weed plants grown in a greenhouse in 2015 and 2016. Two scenarios were evaluated for the comparison: (1) Palmer amaranth versus cotton lines and (2) redroot pigweed versus cotton lines. Statistical significance ( p ≤ 0.05) was determined with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett’s test. Sensitivity measurements were tabulated to determine the optimal region of the light spectrum for weed and cotton line discrimination. Optimal bands for weed and cotton separation were 600 to 700 nm (both weeds versus cotton bronze and cotton yellow), 710 nm (Palmer amaranth versus cotton green), and 1460 nm (redroot pigweed versus cotton green). Spectral bands were identified for separating Palmer amaranth and redroot pigweed from cotton lines with bronze, green, and yellow leaves. Ground-based and airborne sensors can be tuned into the regions of spectrum identified, facilitating using remote sensing technology for Palmer amaranth and redroot pigweed identification in cotton production systems.
- Rowland, M.W., Murray, D.S. and Verhalen, L.M. (1999) Full-Season Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Interference with Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Science, 47, 305-309.
- Morgan, G.D., Baumann, P.A. and Chandler, J.M. (2001) Competitive Impact of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Development and Yield. Weed Technology, 15, 408-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0408:CIOPAA]2.0.CO;2
- Fast, B.J., Murdock, S.W., Farris, R.L., Willis, J.B. and Murray, D.S. (2009) Critical Timing of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Removal in Second-Generation Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton. Journal of Cotton Science, 13, 32-36.
- MacRae, A.W., Webster, T.M., Sosnoskie, L.M., Culpepper, A.S. and Kichler, J.M. (2013) Cotton Yield Loss Potential in Response to Length of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Interference. Journal of Cotton Science, 17, 227-232.
- Flessner, M., Frame, H. and Holshouser, D. (2015) Prevention and Control of Palmer Amaranth in Cotton. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 2805-1001 (PPWS-60NP).
- Buchanan, G.A. and Burns, E.R. (1971) Weed Competition in Cotton. II. Cocklebur and Redroot Pigweed. Weed Science, 19, 580-582.
- Thorp, K. and Tian, L. (2004) A Review on Remote Sensing of Weeds in Agriculture. Precision Agriculture, 5, 477-508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11119-004-5321-1
- Smith, A.M. and Blackshaw, R.E. (2003) Weed-Crop Discrimination Using Remote Sensing: A Detached Leaf Experiment. Weed Technology, 17, 811-820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT02-179
- Koger, C.H., Shaw, D.R., Reddy, K.N. and Bruce, L.M. (2004) Detection of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) with Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. II. Effects of Vegetation Ground Cover and Reflectance Properties. Weed Science, 52, 230-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-03-083R1
- Pena-Barragan, J.M., López-Granados, F., Jurado-Expósito, M. and Garciá-Torres, L. (2006) Spectral Discrimination of Ridolfia segetum and Sunflower as Affected by Phenological Stage. Weed Research, 46, 10-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2006.00488.x
- Thenkabail, P.S., Gumma, M.K., Teluguntla, P. and Mohammed, I.A. (2014) Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Vegetation and Agricultural Crops. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 80, 697-709.
- Thenkabail, P.S., Smith, R.B. and De Pauw, E. (2000) Hyperspectral Vegetation Indices and Their Relationships with Agricultural Crop Characteristics. Remote Sensing of Environment, 71, 158-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00067-X