This article describes how the cartographic depth-to-water (DTW) index in combination with other variables can be used to quantify, model and map the distribution of common forest floor bryophytes, at 1 m resolution. This was done by way of a case study, using 12 terrain and climate representative locations across New Brunswick, Canada. The presence/absence by moss species was determined at each location along upland-to-wetland transects within >10-m spaced 1-m 2 forest floor plots. It was found that Bazzania trilobata, Dicranum polysetum, Polytrichum commune, Hylocomium splendens, and P leurozium schreberi had greater probabilities of occurrence in well-drained forested areas, whereas Sphagnum fuscum and Sphagnum girgensohnii dominated in low-lying wet areas. The presence/absence of each species was quantified by way of logistic regression analyses, using DTW, slope, canopy closure, forest litter depth, ecosite type (8 classes), nutrient regime (4 classes, poor to rich); vegetation type (deciduous, coniferous, mixed, and shrubs), and macro- and micro-topography (upland, wetland; mounds, pits) as predictor variables. Among these, log 10 DTW and forest litter depth were the most consistent predictor variables, followed by mound versus pit. For the mapping pu rpose, only log 10 DTW and already mapped classifications for upland versus wetland and vegetation type were used to predict the probability of occurrences for the most frequent moss species, namely, D. polysetum, P. schreberi and Sphagnum spp. The overall accuracy for doing this ranged from 67 % to 83%, with false positives and negatives amounting to 18 % to 42%. The overall classification accuracy exceeded the probability by chance alone at 76.8%, with the significance level reached at 75.3%. The average level of probability by chance alone was 60.3%.
KeywordsBryophytesWet AreasMacro- and Micro-TopographyForest FloorForest LitterMound And PitCanopy ClosureDigital Elevation ModelingLogistic Regression
Jenkins, R.B. and Frazier, P.S. (2010) High-Resolution Remote Sensing of Upland Swamp Boundaries and Vegetation for Baseline Mapping and Monitoring. Wetlands, 30, 531-540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-010-0059-1
Vanderpoorten, A., Sotiaux, A. and Engels, P. (2005) A GIS-Based Survey for the Conservation of Bryophytes at the Landscape Scale. Biological Conservation, 121, 189-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.04.018
Frego, K.A. and Carleton, T.J. (1995) Microsite Conditions and Spatial Pattern in a Boreal Bryophyte Community. Canadian Journal of Botany, 73, 544-551. https://doi.org/10.1139/b95-056
Fenton, N.J., Frego, K.A. and Sims, M.R. (2003) Changes in Forest Floor Bryophyte (Moss and Liverwort) Communities 4 Years after Forest Harvest. Canadian Journal of Botany, 81, 714-731. https://doi.org/10.1139/b03-063
Fenton, N.J. and Frego, K.A. (2005) Bryophyte (Moss and Liverwort) Conservation under Remnant Canopy in Managed Forests. Biological Conservation, 122, 417-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2004.09.003
Delgadillo, C.M. (1992) Moss Interchange: Bryofloristic Similarities between Mexico and Colombia and the Phytogeographical Role of the Central American Bridge. The Bryologist, 95, 261-265. https://doi.org/10.2307/3243481
Vanderpoorten, A. and Engels, P. (2002) The Effects of Environmental Variation on Bryophytes at a Regional Scale. Ecography, 25, 513-522. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250501.x
Vanderpoorten, A. and Engels, P. (2003) Patterns of Bryophyte Diversity and Rarity at a Regional Scale. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 545-553. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022476902547
Belland, R.J. (2005) A Multivariate Study of Moss Distributions in Relation to Environment in the Gulf of St. Lawrence Region, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany, 83, 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-172
Geffert, J.L., Frahm, J.-P., Barthlott, W. and Mutke, J. (2013) Global Moss Diversity: Spatial and Taxonomic Patterns of Species Richness. Journal of Bryology, 35, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1179/1743282012Y.0000000038
Carleton, T.J. (1990) Variation in Terricolous Bryophyte and Macrolichen Vegetation along Primary Gradients in Canadian Boreal Forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1, 585-594. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235563
Evans, S.A., Halpern, C.B. and McKenzie, D. (2012) The Contributions of Forest Structure and Substrate to Bryophyte Diversity and Abundance in Mature Coniferous forests of the Pacific Northwest. The Bryologist, 115, 278-294. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-115.2.278
Ireland, R.R. and Hanes, A. (1982) Moss Flora of the Maritime Provinces. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.
Belland, R.J. (2010) Mosses (Bryophyta) of the Atlantic Maritime Ecozone. In: McAlpine, D.F. and Smith, I.M., Eds., Assessment of Species Diversity in the Atlantic Maritime Ecozone, NRC Research Press, Ottawa, 179-196.
Busby, J.R., Bliss, L.C. and Hamilton, C.D. (1978) Microclimate Control of Growth Rates and Habitats of the Boreal Forest Mosses, Tomenthypnum nitens and Hylocomium splendens. Ecological Monographs, 48, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.2307/2937294
Conard, H.S. and Redfearn, P.L. (1979) How to Know the Mosses and Liverworts. W.C. Brown Co., Dubuque.
Longton, R.E. (1992) The Role of Bryophytes and Lichens in Terrestrial Ecosystems. In: Bates, J. and Farmer, A., Eds., Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, Oxford University Press, New York.
Rydin, H., Jeglum, J.K. and Hooijer, A. (2006) The Biology of Peatlands. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528722.001.0001
Murphy, P.N.C., Ogilvie, J. and Arp P.A. (2009) Topographic Modelling of Soil Moisture Conditions: A Comparison and Verification of Two Models. European Journal of Soil Science, 60, 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01094.x
Murphy, P.N.C., Ogilvie, J., Meng, F.-R., White, B., Bhatti, J.S. and Arp, P.A. (2011) Modelling and Mapping Topographic Variations in Forest Soils at High Resolution: A Case Study. Ecological Modelling, 222, 2314-2332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.01.003
Campbell, D.M.H., White, B. and Arp, P.A. (2013) Modeling and Mapping Soil Resistance to Penetration and Rutting Using LiDAR-Derived Digital Elevation Data. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 68, 460-473. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.6.460
Bullock, J. (1996) Plants. In: Sutherland, W.J., Ed., Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 111-137.
Sutherland, W.J. (2006) Ecological Census Techniques: A Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790508
Gillrich, J.J., Bowman, K.C. and US Army Corps of Engineers (2010) The Use of Bryophytes as Indicators of Hydric Soils and Wetland Hydrology during Wetland Delineations in the United States.
Neily, P., Basquill, S., Quigley, E., Stewart, B. and Keys, K. (2010) Forest Ecosystem Classification for Nova Scotia. Part I: Vegetation Types. Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, Truro.
NB DNR (NB Department of Natural Resources) (2007) Appendix 1: Ecosites and Ecoelements. In: Zelazny, V.F., Ed., Our Landscape Heritage: The Story of Ecological Land Classification in New Brunswick, NB DNR, Fredericton, 331-340.
NB DNR (NB Department of Natural Resources) (2006) New Brunswick Wetland Classification for 2003-2012 Photo Cycle.
Murphy, P.N.C., Ogilvie, J., Connor, K. and Arp, P.A. (2007) Mapping Wetlands: A Comparison of Two Different Approaches for New Brunswick, Canada. Wetlands, 27, 846-854. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[846:MWACOT]2.0.CO;2
R Development Core Team (2011) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
Jansen, F. and Oksanen, J. (2013) How to Model Species Responses along Ecological Gradients-Huisman-Olff-Fresco Models Revisited. Journal of Vegetation Science, 24, 1108-1117. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12050
Oksanen, J. and Minchin, P.R. (2002) Continuum Theory Revisited: What Shape Are Species Responses along Ecological Gradients? Ecological Modelling, 157, 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00190-4
Akaike, H. (1974) A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Burnham, K. and Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer, New York.
Stockwell, D. and Peterson, A. (2002) Effects of Sample Size on the Performance of Species Distribution Models. Ecological Modelling, 148, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00388-X
Coudon, C. and Gégout, J.C. (2007) Quantitative Prediction of the Distribution and Abundance of Vaccinium myrtillus with Climatic and Edaphic Factors. Journal of Vegetation Science, 18, 517-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2007.tb02566.x
Franklin, J. (2009) Mapping Species Distributions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Huisman, J., Olff, H. and Fresco, L.F.M. (1993) A Hierarchical Set of Models for Species Response Analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science, 4, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235732
Hosmer, D.W. and Lemeshow, S. (1989) Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley Interscience Publication, Chichester.
Hosmer, D.W., Lemeshow, S. and Sturdivant, R.X. (2013) Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd Edition, Wiley, Hoboken. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118548387
Tutz, G. (2012) Regression for Categorical Data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Mansfield, E.R. and Helms, B.P. (1982) Detecting Multicollinearity. The American Statistician, 36, 158-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1982.10482818
Nagelkerke, N.J.D. (1991) A Note on a General Definition of the Coefficient of Determination. Biometrika, 78, 691-692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
Hanley, J.A. and McNeil, B.J. (1982) The Meaning and Use of the Area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve. Radiology, 143, 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
White, J.L. (2013) Logistic Regression Model Effectiveness: Proportional Chance Criteria and Proportional Reduction in Error. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 2, 4-10.
SRI (2009) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands.
Ringius, G.S. and Sims, R.A. (1997) Indicator Plant Species in Canadian Forests. Canadian Forest Service, Ottawa, 218 p.
Lawesson, E.L. and Oksanen, J. (2002) Niche Characteristics of Danish Woody Species as Derived from Coenoclines. Journal of Vegetation Science, 13, 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2002.tb02048.x
Rydgren, K., Okland, R.H. and Okland, T. (2003) Species Response Curves along Environmental Gradients. A Case Study from SE Norwegian Swamp Forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14, 869-880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02220.x
Tiner, R.W. (2005) In Search of Swampland: A Wetland Sourcebook and Field Guide. 2nd Edition, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.
Kent, M. (2012) Vegetation Description and Data Analysis: A Practical Approach. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
Michel, P., Overton, J.M., Mason, N.W.H., Hurst, J.M. and Lee, W.G. (2010) Species-Environment Relationships of Mosses in New Zealand Indigenous Forest and Shrubland Ecosystems. Plant Ecology, 212, 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9827-5
Alpert, P. and Oechel, W.C. (1982) Bryophyte Vegetation and Ecology along a Topographic Gradient in Montane Tundra in Alaska. Holarctic Ecology, 5, 99-108.
Slack, N.G. (1994) Can One Tell the Mire Type from the Bryophytes Alone? Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory, 149-159.
Locky, D.A., Bayley, S.E. and Vitt, D.H. (2005) The Vegetational Ecology of Black Spruce Swamps, Fens, and Bogs in Southern Boreal Manitoba, Canada. Wetlands, 25, 564-582. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2005)025[0564:TVEOBS]2.0.CO;2
Startsev, N., Lieffers, V.J. and Landhausser, S.M. (2008) Effects of Leaf Litter on the Growth of Boreal Feather Mosses: Implication for Forest Floor Development. Journal of Vegetation Science, 19, 253-260. https://doi.org/10.3170/2008-8-18367
Schmalholz, M. and Granath, G. (2013) Effects of Microhabitat and Growth Form on Bryophyte Mortality Associated with Leaf Litter Burial in a Boreal Spruce Forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 25, 439-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12093
Roy, S. and Singh, J.S. (1994) Consequences of Habitat Heterogeneity for Availability of Nutrients in a Dry Tropical Forest. Journal of Ecology, 82, 503-509. https://doi.org/10.2307/2261259
Marschall, M. and Proctor, M.C.F. (2004) Are Bryophytes Shade Plants? Photosynthetic Light Responses and Proportions of Chlorophyll a, Chlorophyll b and Total Carotenoids. Annals of Botany, 94, 593-603. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mch178
Glime, J.M. (2007) Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. Physiological Ecology. Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists, Houghton. http://www.bryoecol.mtu.edu
Okland, R.H. (1994) Patterns of Bryophyte Associations at Different Scales in a Norwegian Boreal Spruce Forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 5, 127-138. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235646
Olsson, B. and Staaf, H. (1995) Influence of Harvesting Intensity of Logging Residues on Ground Vegetation in Coniferous Forests. Journal of Applied Ecology, 32, 640-654. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404659
Peterson, J.E. (1999) The Effects of Forest Harvest on Bryophyte Recolonization in a Mixed Forest in New Brunswick. MSc Thesis, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton.
Austin, M.P. (1980) Searching for a Model for Use in Vegetation Analysis. Plant Ecology, 42, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048865
Arp, P.A. (1984) Forest Floor Variability and Factor Analysis: A Case Study. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 64, 457-461. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss84-046
Arp, P.A. and Krause, H.H. (1984) The Forest Floor: Lateral Variability as Revealed by Systematic Sampling. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 64, 423-437. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss84-043
Betts, M.G., Diamond, A.W., Forbes, G.J., Villard, M.A. and Gunn, J.S. (2006) The Importance of Spatial Autocorrelation, Extent and Resolution in Predicting Forest Bird Occurrence. Ecological Modelling, 191, 197-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.04.027