Morphological Characterization in Wild Species of <i>Heliconias</i> (<i>Heliconia</i> spp) in Mexico
- 1 National Forestry, Crops and Livestock Research Institute (INIFAP)-Experimental Station Rosario Izapa, Tuxtla Chico, Mexico
- 2 Postgraduate College, Postgraduate in Edafology, Montecillo, Mexico
- 3 National Forestry, Crops and Livestock Research Institute (INIFAP)-Experimental Station Rosario Izapa, Tuxtla Chico, Mexico
- 4 Autonomus University of Chapingo, Departament of Fitotecnia, Chapingo, Mexico
- 5 National Forestry, Crops and Livestock Research Institute (INIFAP)-Experimental Station Rosario Izapa, Tuxtla Chico, Mexico
- 6 Autonomus University of Puebla, Teziutlan, Mexico
- 7 National Forestry, Crops and Livestock Research Institute (INIFAP)-Experimental Station Rosario Izapa, Tuxtla Chico, Mexico
- 8 National Forestry, Crops and Livestock Research Institute (INIFAP)-Experimental Station Rosario Izapa, Tuxtla Chico, Mexico
- 9 National Genetic Resources Center –INIFAP, Tepatitlan, Mexico
Abstract
In Mexico, the utilization of native heliconias germplasm for preservation and genetic improvement purposes, has been limited partly because of the unawareness between their population similarities and differences, and because of the degree of genetic divergence that exists among the interspecific and intraspecific ecotypes originated from different regions of the humid tropics. The objective of the present study was to morphological characterization wild species of the genus Heliconias in Mexico through some qualitative and quantitative morphological descriptors. Fifty-five qualitative and quantitative morphological characters were studied in 25 accessions from 11 native species. Characters of plant, leaf, inflorescence, flower, fruit, and seed were taken into account. Data was analyzed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis. Two analyses were carried out: the first one was for the 25 accessions that included characters of flower (55 variables), whereas the second was for only 19 accessions (66 variables) concluded until seed. The first six components explained a 69.4% of the total variation based on PCA. The variables which contributed most significantly were: leaf length (p < 0.001), limb width (p < 0.001), limb's petiole length (p < 0.001), pseudostem thicknes s (p < 0.05)/width at 60 cm (p < 0.05), rachis width (p < 0.05)/thickness (p < 0.001), second bract width (p < 0.001), growth (p < 0.001) and type of inflorescence (p < 0.05), petiole (p < 0.05) and peduncle length (p < 0.05), rachis color (p < 0.05), and wax in limb (p < 0.05) and in pseudostem (p < 0.05). Thirty-eight descriptors were suggested to differentiate wild species of heliconias in Mexico.
- Berry, F.Y. and Kress, W.J. (1991) Heliconia: An Identification Guide. Smithsonian Institute Press, London, 334 p.
- Betancur, J. and Kress, W.J. (2007) The Heliconiaceae Family in Colombia. International Journal of Biology, 1, 77.
- De Ferreira, C.C.E., May, A. and Gonçalves, C. (2007) Atualização da Nomenclatura de Espécies do Gênero Heliconia (Heliconiaceae). Revista Brasileira de Horticultura Ornamental, 13, 38-62.
- De Ferreira, C.C.E., Gonçalves, C., Rocha, M.S. and Faria, O.A. (2011) Helicônias Brasileiras: Características, Ocorrência e Usos Revista. Brasileira de Horticultura Ornamental, 17, 5-24. https://doi.org/10.14295/rbho.v17i1.725
- Baltazar, B.O. and Figueroa, R.K.A. (2009) Flowers that Catch Your Eyes. Study of the Flower Vase and Commercial Life of Ornamental Flowers of the Central Area of the State of Veracruz. College of Postgraduates, Mexico, 80p.
- Gutiérrez, B.C. (2000) Flora of Veracruz, Fascículo 118. Ecology Institute A.C. and University of California, Riverside, 30 p.
- Gutiérrez, B.C. (1996) Heliconiaceae of Mexico (Los Platanillos). La Ciencia Y El Hombre, 22, 119-148.
- Gutiérrez, B.C., Avendaño, R.S. and Zamora, C.P. (2016) Heliconia Veracruzensis, New species from Veracruz, Mexico. Bouteloua, 25, 101-103.
- Iracheta, D.L., De Olivera, S.A., Ortiz, C.S. and López, G.P. (2013) Propagation of Heliconias. INIFAP. Technical Brochure 30. Rosario Izapa Experimental Station, Chiapas, 29 p.
- Abadie, T. and Berreta, A. (2001) Characterization and Evaluation of Phylogenetic Resources. In: Strategy on Phylogenetic Resources for Southern Cone Countries. PROCISUR. Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture IICA, Montevideo Uruguay, 89-97
- Franco, T.L. and Hidalgo, R. (2003) Statistical Analysis of Morphological Characterization Data of Plant Genetic Resources. International Institute for Phylogenetic Resources (IPGRI), Cali, 89 p.
- Valadez, M.E. and Kahl, G. (1997) Analysis of the Plant Genome. Amplification of DNA Fingerprints. In: Third International Biotechnology Course Applied to Plant Genetic Improvement, AutonomusUniversity of Chapingo, Chapingo, 161-168.
- Guimarães, W.N.R., Martins, L.S.S., Castrom, C.E.F., Carvalho Filho, J.L.S. and Loges, V. (2014) Heliconia Phenotypic Diversity Based on Qualitative Descriptors. Genetics and Molecular Research, 13, 3128-3142. https://doi.org/10.4238/2014.April.17.9