Comparative Study of <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Preference for Bt and Non-Bt Soybean Cultivars — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Comparative Study of <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i> (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Preference for Bt and Non-Bt Soybean Cultivars
Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
,
Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
,
Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
,
Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
,
Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
,
FacultyofEngineering UNESP Ilha Solteira, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Ilha Solteira, Brasil
,
Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
1 Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
2 Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
3 Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
4 Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
5 Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
6 FacultyofEngineering UNESP Ilha Solteira, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Ilha Solteira, Brasil
7 Postgraduate Program in Plant Science Agronomy, Universidade Federal do Piauí (UFPI), Bom Jesus, Piauí
Studies on the behavior of <i> Helicoverpa armigera</i> in relation to soybean cultivars expressing Bt proteins are fundamentally important for IPM. We determine the no-choice and feeding choice of <i> H. armigera</i> , the no-choice and oviposition choice in different Bt and non-Bt soybeans cultivars. In the first step it was carried out the experiment to determine the no-choice and food choice in test for 12 Bt and non-Bt soybean cultivars. Simultaneously the consumption was determined. In a second step it was evaluated the no-choice and oviposition choice in different soybean cultivars. <i> Helicoverpa armigera</i> caterpillars showed neither attractiveness and preference for food nor attractiveness and oviposition preference for Bt and non-Bt soybean leaves when simultaneously contrasting the tested cultivars. This study showed that Bt toxin did not influence the oviposition preference, and H. armigera adults did not differentiate Bt and non-Bt soybean cultivars for oviposition indicating no behavioral preference. Third instar caterpillars showed no discrimination between Bt and non-Bt soybean leaves. Research in this area must focus on the possibility of widespread planting of genetically modified soybeans containing the Bt protein, which is associated with selection pressure and the behavior of pest species in relation to their hosts, as well as on the adequacy of management tactics that is able to prevent the loss of technology efficiency.
Cunningham, J.P. and Zalucki, M.P. (2014) Understanding Heliothine (Lepidoptera: Heliothinae) Pests: What Is a Host Plant? Journal of Economic Entomologic, 107, 881-896. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC14036
Saber, M., Parsaeyan, E., Vojoudi, S., Bagheri, M., Mehrvar, A. and Kamita, S.G. (2013) Acute Toxicity and Sublethal Effects of Methoxyfenozide and Thiodicarb on Survival, Development and Reproduction of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Crop Protection, 43, 14-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.09.011
Singh, A.K., Singh, A. and Joshi, P. (2016). Combined Application of Chitinolytic Bacterium Paenibacillussp. D1 with Low Doses of Chemical Pesticides for Better Control of Helicoverpa armigera. International Journal of Pest Management, 62, 222-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670874.2016.1167267
Aheer, G.M., Aziz, M.A., Hameed, A. and Ali, A. (2009) Evaluation of Resistance to Different Insecticides in Field Strains of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Punjab, Pakistan. Entomological Research, 39, 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5967.2009.00210.x
McDonald, B.A. (2015) How Can Research on Pathogen Population Biology Suggest Disease Management Strategies? The Example of Barley Scald (Rhynchosporium Commune). Plant Pathology, 64, 1005-1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12415
Zhang, H., Yin, W., Zhao, J., Jin, L., Yang, Y., Wu, S., Tabashnik, B.E. and Wu, Y. (2011) Early Warning of Cotton Bollworm Resistance Associated with Intensive Planting of Bt Cotton in China. PLoS One, 6, e22874. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022874
Kogan, M. and Ortman, E.F. (978) Antixenosis: A New Term Proposed to Define Painter’s Nonpreference Modality of Resistance. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 24, 175-176.
Lambert, L. and Kilen, T. (1984) Multiple Insect Resistance in Several Soybean Genotypes. Crop Science, 24, 887-890. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050014x
Moreira, G.R., Silva, D.J.H., Carneiro, P.C.S., Picanço, M.C., Vasconcelos, A.A. and Pinto, C.M.F. (2013) Inheritance of Resistance Traits by Solanum pennellii antixose to Tomato Moth at Crossroads with “Santa Clara”. Horticultura Brasileira, 31, 574-581. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362013000400011
Dhillon, M.K., Sharma, H.C., Singh, R. and Naresh, J.S. (2005) Mechanisms of Resistance to Shoot Fly, Atherigona soccata in Sorghum. Euphytica, 144, 301-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-005-7400-4
Fancelli, M., Vendramim, J.D. and Lourenção, A.L. (2008) Oviposition and Dispersal of Bemisia tabaci Nymphs B Biotype in Tomato Genotypes. Bragantia, 67, 933-939. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052008000400016
Frelichowski Jr, J.E. and Juvik, J.A. (2005). Inheritance of Sesquiterpene Carboxylic Acid Synthesis in Crosses of Lycopersicon hirsutum with Insect-Susceptihie Tomatoes. Platit Breeding, 124, 277-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01076.x
Khush, G.S. and Panda, N. (1996) Host Plant Resistance to Insects. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 86, 315-316.
Lara, F.M. (1991) Principles of Plant Resistance to Insects. 2nd Edition, ícone, São Paulo.
Frankenhuyzen, K.V. (2009) Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis Crystal Proteins. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 101, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jip.2009.02.009
Schünemann, R., Knaak, N. and Fiuza, L.M. (2014) Mode of Action and Specificity of Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins in the Control of Caterpillars and Stink Bugs in Soybean Culture. Microbiology, 2014, 1-12.
Ibrahim, M.A., Griko, N., Junker, M. and Bulla, L.A. (2010) Bacillus thuringiensis A Genomics and Proteomics Perspective Bioengineered Bugs. Landes Bioscience, 1, 31-50.
Kasten Júnior, P., Precetti, A.A.C.M. and Parra, J.R.P. (1978) Comparative Biological Data of Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith, 1797) in Two Artificial Diets and Natural Substrate. Revista Engenharia Agricola, 53, 68-78.
Lin, H., Kogan, M., Fischer, D. (1990) Induced Resistance in Soybean to the Mexican Bean Beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae): Comparisons of Inducing Factors. Environmental Entomology, 19, 1852-1857. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/19.6.1852
Baldin, E.L.L. and Lara, F.M. (2001) Foliar Attractiveness and Consumption by Adults of Diabroticaspeciosa (Germ.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Different Genotypes of Pumpkin. Neotropical Entomology, 4, 675-679. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2001000400024
Baldin, E.L.L., Vendramim, J.D. and Lourenção, A.L. (2005) Resistance of Tomato Genotypes to Bemisiatabaci (Gennadius) Biotype B (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Tomato. Neotropical Entomology, 34, 435-441. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2005000300012
SAS-Institute (2002) SAS User's Manual, Version 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
Fenemore, P.G. (1980) Oviposition of Potato Tuber Moth, Phthorimaea operculella Zell. (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae); Identification of Host-Plant Factors Influencing Oviposition Response. New Zealand Journal of Zoology, 7, 435-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014223.1980.10423798
Baldin, E.L.L., Souza, D.R., Souza, E.S. and Beneduzzi, R.A. (2007) Control of the Whitefly with Plant Extracts, in Greenhouse Grown Tomato. Horticultura Brasileira, 25, 602-606. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362007000400022
War, A.R., Paulraj, M.G., Ahmad, T., Buhroo, A.A., Hussain, B., Ignacimuthu, S. and Sharma, H.C. (2012) Mechanisms of Plant Defense against Insect Herbivores. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 7, 1306-1320. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.21663
Kumar, S. and Saini, R.K. (2008) Feeding Preference and Damage Potential of Helicoverpaarmigera (Hübner) on Different Promising Cotton Genotypes/Hybrid. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 10, 411-420.
Luong, T.T., Downes, S.J., Cribb, B., Perkins, L.E. and Zalucki, M.P. (2016) Oviposition Site Selection and Survival of Susceptible and Resistant Larvae of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Bt and Non-Bt Cotton. Bulletin Entomological Research, 106, 710-717. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485316000328
Tabashnik, B.E., Rensburg, J.B.V. and Carrière Y. (2009) Field-Evolved Insect Resistance to Bt Crops: Definition, Theory, and Data. Journal of Economic Entomology, 102, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1603/029.102.0601
Peterson, J.A., Ode, P.J., Oliveira-Hofman, C. and Harwood, J.D. (2016) Integration of Plant Defense Traits with Biological Control of Arthropod Pests: Challenges and Opportunities. Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01794
Yamasaki, A. and Fujisaki, K. (2010) Larval Feeding Preference and Performance of the Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), on Different Flower Parts of Cosmos. Applied Entomology and Zoology, 45, 627-633. https://doi.org/10.1303/aez.2010.627
Baghery, F., Fathipour, Y. and Naseri, B. (2013) Nutritional Indices of Helicoverpaarmigera (Lep.: Noctuidae) on Seeds of Five Host Plants. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology, 80, 19-27.
Browne, B. and Raubenheimer, D. (2003) Ontogenetic Changes in the Rate of Ingestion and Estimates of Food Consumption in Fourth and Fifth Instar Helicoverpaarmigera Caterpillars. Journal of Insect Physiology, 49, 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1910(02)00247-0
Wei, J., Guo, Y., Liang, G., Wu, K., Zhang, J., Tabashnik, B.E. and Li, X. (2015) Cross-Resistance and Interactions between Bt Toxins Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab against the Cotton Bollworm. Scientific Reports, 5, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07714
Rao, N.S. and Rao, P.A. (2008) Behavioural and Physiological Effects of Bt Cotton on Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpaarmigera (Hub). Journal Entomology Research, 32, 273-278.
Torres, J.B. and Ruberson, J.R. (2006) Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Oviposition Behavior of Bollworm and Three of Its Predators in Bt and Non-Bt Cotton Fields. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 120, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00422.x
Greenplate, J.T., Mullins, J.W., Penn, S.R., Dahm, A., Reich, B.J., Osborn, J.A., Rahn, P.R., Ruschke, L. and Shappley, Z.W. (2003) Partial Characterization of Cotton Plants Expressing Two Toxin Proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis: Relative Toxin Contribution, Toxin Interaction, and Resistance Management. Journal of Applied Entomologic, 127, 340-347. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0418.2003.00766.x
Tingle, F.C., Mitchell, E.R. and Heath, R.R. (1990) Preferences of Mated Heliothis virescens and Subflexa Females for Host and Nonhost Volatiles in a Flight Tunnel. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 16, 2889-2898. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00979481
Ramaswamy, S.B., Keung Ma, W. and Baker, G.T. (1978) Sensory Cues and Receptors for Oviposition by Heliothis virescens. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 43, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1987.tb03600.x
Jallow, M.F.A., Zalucki, M.P. and Fitt, G.P. (1999) Role of Chemical Cues from Cotton in Mediating Host Selection and Oviposition Behaviour in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Australian Journal of Entomology, 38, 359-366. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-6055.1999.00131.x
Yan, F., Bengtsson, M., Anderson, P., Ansebo, L., Xu, C. and Witzgall, P. (2004) Antennal Response of Cotton Bollworm (Heliocoverpa armigera) to Volatiles in Transgenic Bt Cotton. Journal of Applied Entomology, 128, 354-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2004.00857.x
Naseri, B., Fathipour, Y., Moharramipour, S. and Hosseininaveh, V. (2009) Comparative Life History and Fecundity of Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on Different Soybean Varieties. Entomological Science, 12, 147-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8298.2009.00310.x
Olsen, K.M. and Daly, J.C. (2000) Plant-Toxin Interactions in Transgenic Bt Cotton and their Effect on Mortality of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 93, 1293-1299. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-93.4.1293
Zitsanza, E.S., Giga, D.P. and Knight, J.D. (2006) Oviposition Site Preferences by Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): Effect of Season and Density on Distribution of Eggs on Plants. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 23, 138-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2006.10634744
Jongsma, M.A., Gould, F., Legros, M., Yang, L., Van Loon, J.J.A. and Dicke, M. (2010) Insect Oviposition Behavior Affects the Evolution of Adaptation to Bt Crops: Consequences for Refuge Policies. Evolutionary Ecology, 24, 1017-1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2006.10634744
Gore, J., Leonard, B.R. and Jones, R.H. (2003) Influence of Agronomic Hosts on the Susceptibility of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Genetically Engineered and Non-Engineered Cottons. Environmental Entomology, 32, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-32.1.103