Palmer Amaranth (<i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> S. Wats.) and Pitted Morningglory (<i>Ipomoea lacunosa</i> L.) Control in Dicamba Tolerant Soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.) — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Palmer Amaranth (<i>Amaranthus palmeri</i> S. Wats.) and Pitted Morningglory (<i>Ipomoea lacunosa</i> L.) Control in Dicamba Tolerant Soybean (<i>Glycine max</i> L.)
Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
,
Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville, SC, USA
,
Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville, SC, USA
1 Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
2 Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville, SC, USA
3 Edisto Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Blackville, SC, USA
Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory are difficult to manage weeds present in South Carolina soybean production fields. Glyphosate and ALS-resistant Palmer amaranth biotypes have spread rapidly throughout South Carolina making the control of these weeds more difficult. Recently, soybean varieties with tolerance to dicamba have been introduced along with several new ultra-low volatility formulations of dicamba to help with the problem. Field experiments were conducted near Blackville, SC in 2012 and 2013 to evaluate dicamba herbicide programs for broadleaf weed management in dicamba tolerant soybean. At 2 weeks after POST1 (2 WAP1), Palmer amaranth control ranged from 93% to 100% across the PRE followed by POST treatments in 2012 and 2013. By 2 weeks after POST2 (2 WAP2), control was 95% or better. Treatments containing two or three herbicide applications (PRE, POST1 and POST2) offered good to excellent (92% - 100%) pitted morningglory control. No differences in weed control were observed among treatments with 3 application times compared to those applied twice. In general, all treatments with a PRE followed by at least one POST application provided good to excellent control of Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory. Overall, a PRE (either dicamba or flumioxazin) followed by a dicamba or a non-dicamba containing POST treatment provided good to excellent control of Palmer amaranth and pitted morningglory when applied at the correct growth stage.
Castleberry, R.M., Crum, C.W. and Krull, C.F. (1984) Genetic Yield Improvement of U.S. Maize Cultivars under Varying Fertility and Climatic Environments. Crop Science, 24, 33-36. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400010008x
Specht, J.E., Hume, D.J. and Kumudini, S.V. (1999) Soybean Yield Potential—A Genetic and Physiological Perspective. Crop Science, 39, 1560-1570. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961560x
Reddy, K.N. (2001) Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean as a Weed Management Tool: Opportunities and Challenges. Weed Biology and Management, 1, 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-6664.2001.00032.x
Green, J.M., Hazel, C.B., Forney, D.R.L. and Pugh, M. (2008) New Multiple-Herbicide Crop Resistance and Formulation Technology to Augment the Utility of Glyphosate. Pest Management Science, 64, 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1486
Heap, I.M. (2017) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.com
Sosnoskie, L.M., Kichler, J.M., Wallace, R.D. and Culpepper, A.S. (2011) Multiple Resistance in Palmer Amaranth to Glyphosate and Pyrithiobac Confirmed in Georgia. Weed Science, 59, 321-325. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-10-00132.1
Nandula, V.K., Reddy, K.N., Koger, C.H., Poston, D.H., Rimando, A.M., Duke, S.O., Bond, J.A. and Ribeiro, D.N. (2012) Multiple Resistance to Glyphosate and Pyrithiobac in Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) from Mississippi and Response to Flumiclorac. Weed Science, 60, 179-188. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00157.1
Norsworthy, J.K. (2003) Use of Soybean Production Surveys to Determine Weed Management Needs of South Carolina Farmers. Weed Technology, 17, 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0195:UOSPST]2.0.CO;2
Cork, D.J. and Kreuger, J. (1991) Microbial Transformations of Herbicides and Pesticides. Advances in Applied Microbiology, 36, 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2164(08)70450-7
Wang, X., Li, B., Herman, P.L. and Weeks, D. (1994) Analysis of Dicamba Degradation by Pseudomonas maltophilia Using High Performance Capillary Electrophoresis. Analytical Biochemistry, 219, 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1228
Anonymous (2010) Clarity Herbicide Product Label. BASF Publication No. NVA 2010-04-065-0154. BASF, Research Triangle Park, NC, 22 p.
Behrens, M.R., Mutlu, N., Chakraborty, S., Dumitru, R., Jiang, W.Z., La Vallee, B.J. and Weeks, D.P. (2007) Dicamba Resistance: Enlarging and Preserving Biotechnology-Based Weed Management Strategies. Science, 316, 1185-1188. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141596
Strachan, S.D., Casini, M.S., Heldreth, K.M., Scocas, J.A., Nissen, S.J., Bukun, B. and Brunk, G. (2010) Vapor Movement of Synthetic Auxin Herbicides: Aminocyclopyrachlor, Aminocyclopyrachlor-Methyl Ester, Dicamba, and Aminopyralid. Weed Science, 58, 103-108. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-09-00011.1
Bode, L.E., Butler, B.J. and Goering, C.E. (1976) Spray Drift and Recovery as Affected by Spray Thickener, Nozzle Type, and Nozzle Pressure. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 19, 213-218. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.35997
Anonymous (2017) Xtendimax with VaporGrip Technology Herbicide Product Label. Monsanto Publication No. 35008R5-5, Monsanto, St. Louis, MO, 9 p.
Anonymous (2017) Engenia Herbicide Product Label. BASF Publication No. NVA 2017-04-385-0200, BASF, Research Triangle Park, NC, 22 p.
Anonymous (2017) FeXapan Herbicide plus VaporGrip Technology Product Label. DuPont Publication No. SL-2077A 101817, DuPont, Wilmington, DE, 25 p.
Marshall, M.W., Greene, J.K., Bellinger, B., Reay-Jones, F., Mueller, J.D., Anco, D., Peterson, P., Tsuruda, J., Heaton, W.C., Crouch, A.J. and Beer, B. (2017) South Carolina Pest Management Handbook. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service Publication, APT-17, 316 p.
Joseph, D.D., Sanders, C.H. and Marshall, M.W. (2017) Evaluation of 2,4-D-Choline Based Herbicide Systems in 2,4-D Tolerant Soybean (Glycine max L.). Agricultural Sciences, 8, 385-396. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2017.85029
Johnson, B., Young, B., Matthews, J., Marquardt, P., Slack, C., Bradley, K., York, A., Culpepper, A.S., Hager, A., Al-Khatib, K., Steckel, L., Moechnig, M., Loux, M., Bernards, M. and Smeda, R. (2010) Weed Control in Dicamba-Resistant Soybeans. Crop Management, 9, 23 p.
Han, J., Liu, H., Guo, P. and Hao, C. (2002) Weed Control in Summer-Sown Soybeans with Flumioxazin plus Acetochlor and Flumiclorac-Pentyl plus Clethodim. Weed Biology and Management, 2, 120-122. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-6664.2002.00057.x
Merchant, R.M., Sosnoskie, L.M., Culpepper, A.S., Steckel, L.E., York, A.C., Braxton, B. and Ford, J.C. (2013) Weed Response to 2,4-D, 2,4-DB, and Dicamba Applied Alone or with Glufosinate. Journal of Cotton Science, 17, 212-218. http://www.cotton.org/journal/2013-17/3/upload/JCS17-212.pdf
Niekamp, J.W. (1998) Weed Management with Sulfentrazone and Flumioxazin in No-Till Soybean. M.S. Thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 110 p.
Siebert, J.D., Griffin, J.L. and Jones, C.A. (2004) Red Morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) Control with 2,4-D and Alternative Herbicides. Weed Technology, 18, 38-44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3989586 https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-03-071R1
Monks, C.D., Wilcut, J.W. and Richburg, J.S. (1993) Broadleaf Weed Control in Soybean (Glycine max) with Chlorimuron plus Acifluorfen or Thifensulfuron Mixtures. Weed Technology, 7, 317-321. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3987606
Grichar, W.J. (1997) Influence of Herbicides and Timing of Application on Broadleaf Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technology, 11, 708-713. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3988762
Elliott, J.A., Cessna, A.J., Nicholaichuk, W. and Tollefson, L.C. (2000) Leaching Rates and Preferential Flow of Selected Herbicides through Tilled and Untilled Soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, 1650-1656. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900050036x