Critique on Nikolai Gogol’s The Nose
- 1 Global Maritime Archaeology, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
Abstract
This paper challenges traditional interpretations of Nikolai Gogol’s The Nose as a political or socio-economic metaphor. Instead, it argues that the story should be understood and appreciated as a purely absurdist work—one that does not seek to convey hidden meanings or critiques, but rather exists for the sake of absurdity itself. The literature studied in this context is not in the language of the studied writer—Gogol was a Ukrainian writer who wrote in Russian. As a result, this work incorporates Russian literature. This is utilized to substantiate the main arguments, including the presence of defamiliarization in his absurdist works and absurdity existing for absurdities sake.
- Abdalqader Abu Jweid, A. N., Termizi, A. A., & Babaee, R. (2015). The Concept of Angst in Nikolai Gogol’s “ The Nose ”. International Journal of Russian Studies , No. 4 , 65-71.
- Bell, D. F. (2023). On The Nose . SubStance, 52, 231-236. https://doi.org/10.1353/sub.2023.a900559
- Bely, A. (1934). The Mastery of Gogol . Ogiz. (In Russian)
- Gogol, N. (2024). The Enchanted Place (Vol. 20). Marchen Press.
- Karlinsky, S. (1967). Surrealism in Twentieth-Century Russian Poetry: Churilin, Zabolotskii, Poplavskii. Slavic Review, 26, 605-617. https://doi.org/10.2307/2492612
- Karlinsky, S. (1992). The Sexual Labyrinth of Nikolai Gogol. University of Chicago Press.
- Mirsky, D. S. (1999). A History of Russian Literature (p. 155). Northwestern University Press.
- Shklovsky, V. (1970). String: On the Dissimilarity of the Similar . Sovetsky Pisatel.
- Shukman, A. (2002). Nikolai Gogol Nos—(Essay Date 1989). In J. Witalec (Ed.), Short Story Criticism (Vol. 52). Project Editor, Gale Cengage.