Most American anthology and canon revision has focused on author and text selections but little on the anthology editorial apparatus. The following study responds to this gap by analyzing gender representation across prefaces and overviews of the Norton and Heath American anthologies (1979-2010). Through a combined rhetorical and corpus linguistic analysis, the study reveals disparate gender representation in these materials: women are increasingly mentioned over time, but men continue to emerge as individuals of importance while women are discussed primarily as a group. This examination suggests that the revisionist, feminist scrutiny of Norton and Heath inventory has not been brought to bear on the anthologies’ apparatus—and that discursive patterns therein remain largely invisible despite that they contradict efforts to revise gender bias in anthologies. In so doing, the study offers an exploratory analysis of new methods (combined linguistic and rhetorical analysis) and new sites (apparatus texts) for examining gender in canonical and pedagogical materials.
Anthony, L. (2005). Antconc (Version 3.2.1). Tokyo: Laurence Anthony, University of Waseda.
Arac, J. (2008). What Good Can Literary History Do? American Literary History, 20, 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajm053
Aull, L. L. (2012). Students creating canons. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/15314200-1625271
Baym, N. (1989). The Norton anthology of American literature (3rd ed.). New York: Norton.
Baym, N. (1995). The Norton anthology of American literature (4th ed.). New York: Norton.
Baym, N. (2002a). Plenary remarks. Legacy, 19, 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/leg.2003.0002
Baym, N. (Ed.) (1998). The Norton anthology of American literature (5th ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
Baym, N. (Ed.) (2002b). The Norton anthology of American literature (6th ed., Vol. E). New York: Norton.
Baym, N., et al. (Ed.) (2007). The Norton anthology of American literature (7th ed.). New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
Baym, N., et al. (1985). The Norton anthology of American literature (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
Bennett, P. (1991). Canons to the Right of Them... The Women’s Review of Books, 8, 15-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4020997
Brown, J. L. (2010). Constructing our pedagogical canons. Pedagogy, 10, 535-553.
Csicsila, J. T. (1998). Canons by consensus: Critical trends and American literature anthologies. Las Vegas, Nevada: University of Nevada. http://proquest.umi.com.proxy.lib.umich.edu/pqdweb?did=732886261&Fmt=7&clientId=17822&RQT=309&VName=PQD
Dyer, M. (2001). Invitation to anthologize. In A. R. Gere, & P. Shaheen (Eds.), Making American literatures in high school and college (pp. 10-16). Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English.
Egan, J. (1997). Analyzing the Apparatus: Teaching American Literature Anthologies as Texts. Early American Literature, 32, 102-108.
Elmer, J. (2008). A Response to Jonathan Arac. American Literary His- tory, 20, 12-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alh/ajn004
Fetterley, J. (1978). The resisting reader: A feminist approach to American fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Frow, J. (2006). Genre. London, New York: Routledge.
Genette, G., & Maclean, M. (1991). Introduction to the Paratext. New Literary History, 22, 261-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/469037
Gottesman, R., Murphy, F., Holland, L. B., Parker, H., Kalstone, D., & Pritchard, W. (1979). The Norton anthology of American literature (1st ed., Vol. 1). New York: Norton.
Graff, G. (1987). Professing literature: An institutional history.
Guillory, J. (1993). Cultural capital: The problem of literary canon formation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226310015.001.0001
Jay, G. S. (1991). The End of “American” Literature: Toward a Multicultural Practice. College English, 53, 264-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/378101
Lauter, P. (1983). Reconstructing American literature: Courses, syllabi, issues. Old Westbury, N.Y.: Feminist Press.
Lauter, P. (1991). Canons and contexts. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lauter, P., & Bruce, N. (1990). The Heath anthology of American literature. Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath.
Lauter, P., et al. (Ed.). (2002). The Heath anthology of American literature (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Lauter, P., et al. (Ed.). (2005). The Heath anthology of American literature (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Lauter, P., et al. (Ed.). (2009). The Heath anthology of American literature (6th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Lauter, P., Yarborough, R., & Bruce, N. (1994). The Heath anthology of American literature (2nd ed.). Lexington, Mass.: D.C. Heath and Co.
Lauter, P., Yarborough, R., & Bruce, N. (1998). The Heath anthology of American literature (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Lockard, J., & Sandell, J. (2008). National Narratives and the Politics of Inclusion: Historicizing American Literature Anthologies. Pedagogy, 8, 227-254.
Papadima, L., Damrosch, D., & D’haen, T. (2011). The Canonical De- bate Today: Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries: Rodopi.
Robinson, L. S. (1987). Canon Fathers and Myth Universe. New Literary History, 19, 23-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/469299
Ruland, R. (1991). Art and a Better America. American Literary History, 3, 337-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/alh/3.2.337
Shesgreen, S. (2009). Canonizing the Canonizer: A Short History of The Norton Anthology of English Literature. Critical Inquiry, 35, 293-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/596644
Shumway, D. R. (1994a). American Literature in the Currriculum Creating American civilization: A genealogy of American literature as an academic discipline. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Shumway, D. R. (1994b). Creating American civilization: A genealogy of American literature as an academic discipline. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.