Development of an Effective System for Selecting Construction Materials for Sustainable Residential Housing in Western Australia — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Development of an Effective System for Selecting Construction Materials for Sustainable Residential Housing in Western Australia
School of Management, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
,
School of Management, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
1 School of Management, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
2 School of Management, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
Urbanization and living comfort have revolutionized the construction industry. Many techniques and strategies have been used to improve the overall efficiency of construction and to reduce waste during and after the construction activity; some are cost effective and some not. Sustainable construction strategies have addressed these issues by proposing relatively more cost effective and environment-saving solutions. One strategy is to select sustainable construction materials at the building design stage. This article involved a questionnaire survey to collect data about local technical stakeholders’ (architects, designers, engineers, estimators, and managers) awareness of environmental sustainability and current practices for selecting construction materials. A sustainability index (SI) was developed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) for the complex statistical analysis. These data were used to develop a decision support system (DSS) using the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) technique, the TOPSIS. The support system was validated by applying it to sustainable roof products in a pilot case study—these materials are frequently used in local markets for residential construction in West Australia. So the main objective was to get insight to local market trends and features involved in construction materials selection. Data analysis was carried out to develop a decision support system to help technical stakeholders in construction materials selection process.
KeywordsConstruction IndustrySustainability Index (SI)Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM)Decision Support System (DSS)TOPSIS
Dulaimi, M.F., Ling, F.Y. and Bajracharya, A. (2003) Organizational Motivation and Inter-Organizational Interaction in Construction Innovation in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 21, 307-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144619032000056144
Black, C., Akintoye, A. and Fitzgerald, E. (2000) An Analysis of Success Factors and Benefits of Partnering in Construction. International Journal of Project Management, 18, 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00046-0
Chinyio, E.A. and Olomolaiye, P.O. (1999) A Needs Based Methodology for Classifying Construction Clients and Selecting Contractors—A Rejoinder. Construction Management & Economics, 17, 413-417. https://doi.org/10.1080/014461999371330
Gliem, J.A. and Gliem, R.R. (2003) Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education, Ohio State University, 82-88.
Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A. and Fontenot, R. (2013) Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research? A Review of Qualitative Interviews in IS Research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54, 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
Francis, J.J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M.P., et al. (2010) What Is an Adequate Sample Size? Operationalising Data Saturation for Theory-Based Interview Studies. Psychology and Health, 25, 1229-1245. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903194015
Munn, P. and Drever, E. (1990) Using Questionnaires in Small-Scale Research. A Teachers’ Guide, ERIC.
Mason, M. (2010) Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research.
Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J. and Pardasani, A. (2002) Collaborative Conceptual Design—State of the Art and Future Trends. Computer-Aided Design, 34, 981-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00157-9
Rao, P. and Holt, D. (2005) Do Green Supply Chains Lead to Competitiveness and Economic Performance? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25, 898-916. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510613956
Ding, G.K. (2008) Sustainable Construction—The Role of Environmental Assessment Tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86, 451-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.025
Tan, Y., Shen, L. and Yao, H. (2011) Sustainable Construction Practice and Contractors’ Competitiveness: A Preliminary Study. Habitat International, 35, 225-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.09.008
Bribián, I.Z., Capilla, A.V. and Usón, A.A. (2011) Life Cycle Assessment of Building Materials: Comparative Analysis of Energy and Environmental Impacts and Evaluation of the Eco-Efficiency Improvement Potential. Building and Environment, 46, 1133-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.002
Dair, C.M. and Williams, K. (2006) Sustainable Land Reuse: The Influence of Different Stakeholders in Achieving Sustainable Brownfield Developments in England. Environment and Planning A, 38, 1345-1366. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37370
Xu, Z. and Yager, R.R. (2006) Some Geometric Aggregation Operators Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. International Journal of General Systems, 35, 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081070600574353
Omar, M.N. and Fayek, A.R. (2016) A TOPSIS-Based Approach for Prioritized Aggregation in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 23, 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1561
Zhao, X., Lin, R. and Wei, G. (2013) Fuzzy Prioritized Operators and Their Application to Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 4759-4770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.09.048
Yager, R.R., Gumrah, G. and Reformat, M.Z. (2011) Using a Web Personal Evaluation Tool-PET for Lexicographic Multi-Criteria Service Selection. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24, 929-942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.02.004
Chen, L. and Xu, Z. (2014) A Prioritized Aggregation Operator Based on the OWA Operator and Prioritized Measure. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 27, 1297-1307. https://doi.org/10.3233/IFS-131098
Chu, T.-C. (2002) Facility Location Selection Using Fuzzy TOPSIS under Group Decisions. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10, 687-701. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218488502001739
Lootsma, F.A. (2000) Distributed Multi-Criteria Decision Making and the Role of the Participants in the Process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 9, 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1360(200001/05)9:1/3 3.0.CO;2-L
Bisdorff, R., Meyer, P. and Veneziano, T. (2014) Elicitation of Criteria Weights Maximising the Stability of Pairwise Outranking Statements. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 21, 113-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1496
Çalışkan, H., Kurşuncu, B., Kurbanoğlu, C. and Güven, Ş.Y. (2013) Material Selection for the Tool Holder Working under Hard Milling Conditions Using Different Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods. Materials & Design, 45, 473-479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.09.042
Yoon, K. (1980) Systems Selection by Multiple Attribute Decision Making. PhD Thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan (KS).
Hwang, B.G. and Tan, J.S. (2012) Green Building Project Management: Obstacles and Solutions for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Development, 20, 335-349. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.492
Tzeng, G.-H., Lin, C.-W. and Opricovic, S. (2005) Multi-Criteria Analysis of Alternative-Fuel Buses for Public Transportation. Energy Policy, 33, 1373-1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014
Shanian, A. and Savadogo, O. (2006) TOPSIS Multiple-Criteria Decision Support Analysis for Material Selection of Metallic Bipolar Plates for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell. Journal of Power Sources, 159, 1095-1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.12.092
Sharma, P.K., Aggarwal, A. and Gupta, R. (1993) An Expert System for Aid in Material Selection Process. Proceedings of the Engineering Management Society Conference on Managing Projects in a Borderless World, New Delhi, 17-18 December 1993, 27-31.
Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M. and Chakraborty, S. (2010) Selection of Industrial Robots Using Compromise Ranking and Outranking Methods. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 26, 483-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.007