Like a Sum Is Generalized into an Integral, a Product May Be Generalized into an Inteduct
- 1 Department of Business and Economics, Neu-Ulm University, Neu-Ulm, Germany
- 2 Department of Business and Economics, Neu-Ulm University, Neu-Ulm, Germany
Abstract
It is well known that an integral is nothing but a continuous form of a sum. Is it possible to do the same thing with a product? The answer is yes and done for the first time in this publication. The new operator is called inteduct. As an integral is a proper tool to calculate the arithmetic mean of a function, the inteduct gives the geometric mean of a function. This defines a new branch of mathematics. Most applications may lay way ahead. Only some are discussed here. One is applying the inteduct to probability theory. There it is possible e.g., to determine a function for a life expectation rather than just a numerical value. Another application is to distinguish chaos from randomness within numerically given values. At least for the logistic map there exists a direct connection between Lyapunov exponent and inteduct. To distinguish between chaos and randomness is particularly important in finance. While randomness implies ergodicity, chaos is non-ergodic. And many fundamental financial theories from portfolio theory to market efficiency require ergodicity.
- Bronshtein, I.N., Semendyayev, K.A., Musiol, G. and Muehlig, H. (2007) Handbook of Mathematics. 5th English Edition, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.
- Grabinski, M. and Klinkova, G. (2019) Wrong Use of Averages Implies Wrong Results from Many Heuristic Models. Applied Mathematics, 10, 605-618. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2019.107043
- Grabinski, M. and Klinkova, G. (2020) Scrutinizing Distributions Proves That IQ Is Inherited and Explains the Fat Tail. Applied Mathematics, 11, 957-984. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2020.1110063
- Markovitz, H.M. (1952) Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
- Fama, E.F. (1965) The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices. Journal of Business, 5, 34-105. https://doi.org/10.1086/294743
- Klinkova, G. (2018) The Effects of Chaos on Business Operations. Ph.D. Thesis, Hochschule Neu-Ulm University, Neu-Ulm. http://uni-neu-ulm.de/Klinkova_PhD
- Klinkova, G. and Grabinski, M. (2017) Due to Instability Gambling Is the Best Model for Most Financial Products. Archives of Business Research, 5, 255-261. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.53.3029
- Conway, J.H. (1978) A Gamut of Game Theories. Mathematics Magazine, 51, 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0025570X.1978.11976668
- Henle, J. (2021) J. H. Conway and the End of the Story of Numbers. The Mathematical Intelligencer, 43, 10-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-021-10053-1
- Lunkenheimer, M., Kracklauer, A., Klinkova, G. and Grabinski, M. (2022) Homo Economicus to Model Human Behavior Is Ethically Doubtful and Mathematically Inconsistent. Preprint.
- Schuster, H.G. (1984) Deterministic Chaos. WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
- Grabinski, M. (2004) Is There Chaos in Management or Just Chaotic Management? Reprint from: Complex Systems, Intelligence and Modern Technology Applications, Paris. http://www.h-n-u.de/Veroeffentlichungen/CSIMTA%202004.pdf
- Filipe, J.A., Ferreira, M.A.M., Coelho, M. and Pedro, M.I. (2010) Chaos, Anti-Chaos and Resources: Dealing with Complexity. Aplimat—Journal of Applied Mathematics, 3, 83-90.