Attribute Reduction in Interval and Set-Valued Decision Information Systems
- 1 College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Shan’xi Normal University, Linfen, China
- 2 College of Mathematics and Computer Science, Shan’xi Normal University, Linfen, China
- 3 Shanxi Coal Mining Adminstrators College, Taiyuan, China
Abstract
In many practical situation, some of the attribute values for an object may be interval and set-valued. This paper introduces the interval and set-valued information systems and decision systems. According to the semantic relation of attribute values, interval and set-valued information systems can be classified into two categories : disjunctive (Type 1) and conjunctive (Type 2) systems. In this paper, we mainly focus on semantic interpretation of Type 1. Then, we define a new fuzzy preference relation and construct a fuzzy rough set model for interval and set-valued information systems. Moreover, based on the new fuzzy preference relation, the concepts of the significance measure of condition attributes and the relative significance measure of condition attributes are given in interval and set-valued decision information systems by the introduction of fuzzy positive region and the dependency degree. And on this basis, a heuristic algorithm for calculating fuzzy positive region reduction in interval and set-valued decision information systems is given. Finally, we give an illustrative example to substantiate the theoretical argumen ts. The results will help us to gain much more insights into the meaning of fuzzy rough set theory. Furthermore, it has provided a new perspective to study the attribute reduction problem in decision systems.
- Z. Pawlak, “Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data,” Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.
- J. H. Dai and H. W. Tian, “Fuzzy Rough Set Model Forset-Valued Data,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 229, 2013, pp. 54-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2013.03.005
- Y. H. Qian, J. Y. Liang, W. Z. Wu and C. Y. Dang, “Information Granularity in Fuzzy Binary Grc Model,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2011, pp. 253-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2010.2095461
- Z. Q. Meng and Z. Z. Shi, “Extended Rough Set-Based Attribute Reduction in Inconsistent Incomplete Decision Systems,” Information Sciences, Vol. 204, 2012, pp. 4469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2012.04.004
- T. Q. Deng, C. D. Yang and X. F. Wang, “A Reduct Derived from Feature Selection,” Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 33, No. 12, 2012, pp. 1638-1646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2012.03.028
- Y. J. Lin, J. J. Li and S. X. Wu, “Rough Set Theory in Interval and Set-Valued Information Systems,” Control and Decision, Vol. 26, No. 11, 2011, pp. 1611-1615.
- R. C. Berredo, P. Y. Ekel and R. M. Palhares, “Fuzzy Preference Relations in Models of Decision Making,” Nonlinear Analysis, Vol. 63, No. 5-7, 2005, pp. e735-e741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.02.093
- E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, F. Chiclana and M. Luque, “Some Issues on Consistency of Fuzzy Preference Relations,” European Journal of Operational Researcher, Vol. 154, No. 1, 2004, pp. 98-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00725-7
- Q. H. Hu, D. R. Yu and M. Z. Guo, “Fuzzy Preference Based Rough Sets,” Information Sciences, Vol. 180, No. 10, 2010, pp. 2003-2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2010.01.015
- Y. M. Wang and Z, P. Fan, “Fuzzy Preference Relations Aggregation and Weight Determination,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2007, pp. 163172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2007.05.001
- L. L. Lee, “Group Decision Making with Incomplete Fuzzy Preference Relations Based on the Additive Consistency and the Other Consistency Original,” Experts Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, No. 14, 2012, pp. 11666-11676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.043
- B. Zhu, “Studies on Consistency Measure of Hesitant Fuzzy Preference Relations,” Procedia Computer Science, Vol. 17, 2013, pp. 457-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.059