Mixed Model, AMMI and Eberhart-Russel Comparison via Simulation on Genotype × Environment Interaction Study in Sugarcane — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Mixed Model, AMMI and Eberhart-Russel Comparison via Simulation on Genotype × Environment Interaction Study in Sugarcane
CanaVialis/Monsanto, Campinas, Brazil
,
Departamento de Ciências Exatas, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP—Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, Brazil
1 CanaVialis/Monsanto, Campinas, Brazil
2 Departamento de Ciências Exatas, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, UNESP—Universidade Estadual Paulista, Campus Jaboticabal, Jaboticabal, Brazil
Brazil is the world leader in sugarcane production and the largest sugar exporter. Developing new varieties is one of the main factors that contribute to yield increase. In order to select the best genotypes, during the final selection stage, varieties are tested in different environments (locations and years), and breeders need to estimate the phenotypic performance for main traits such as tons of cane yield per hectare (TCH) considering the genotype × environment interaction (GEI) effect. Geneticists and biometricians have used different methods and there is no clear consensus of the best method. In this study, we present a comparison of three methods, viz. Eberhart-Russel (ER), additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) and mixed model (REML/BLUP), in a simulation study performed in the R computing environment to verify the effectiveness of each method in detecting GEI, and assess the particularities of each method from a statistical standpoint. In total, 63 cases representing different conditions were simulated, generating more than 34 million data points for analysis by each of the three methods. The results show that each method detects GEI differently in a different way, and each has some limitations. All three methods detected GEI effectively, but the mixed model showed higher sensitivity. When applying the GEI analysis, firstly it is important to verify the assumptions inherent in each method and these limitations should be taken into account when choosing the method to be used.
Perecin, D., Landell, M.G.A., Xavier, M.A., Anjos, I.A., Bidoia, M.A.P. and Silva, D.N. (2009) Agronomic and Genetic Progress in Sugar-Cane Breeding Program. Revista Brasileira de Biometria, 27, 279-287. http://jaguar.fcav.unesp.br/RME/fasciculos/v27/v27_n2/Perecin.pdf.
Ramburan, S., Zhou, M. and Labuschagne, M. (2011) Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interactions of Sugarcane: Identifying Significant Environmental Factors. Field Crops Research, 124, 392-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.07.008
Yan, W., and Tinker, N.A. (2006) Biplot Analysis of Multi-Environment Trial Data: Principles and Applications. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86, 623-645. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/P05-169
Eberhart, S.A., and Russel, W.A. (1966) Stability Parameters for Comparing Varieties. Crop Science, 6, 36-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
Gollob, H.F. (1968) A Statistical Model Which Combines Features of Factor Analytic and Analysis of Variance Techniques. Psychometrika, 33, 73-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289676
Gabriel, K.R. (1971) The Biplot Graphic Display of Matrices with Application to Principal Component Analysis. Biometrika, 58, 453-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/58.3.453
Mandel, J. (1971) A New Analysis of Variance Model for Non-Additive Data. Technometrics, 13, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1971.10488751
Gauch, H.G. (1988) Model Selection and Validation for Yield Trials with Interaction. Biometrics, 44, 705-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2531585
Gauch, H.G. (2006) Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Science, 46, 1488-1500. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.07-0193
Zobel, R.W., Wright, M.J. and Gauch, H.G. (1988) Statistical Analysis of a Yield Trial. Agronomy Journal, 80, 388-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030002x
van Eeuwijk, F.A. (1995) Linear and Bilinear Models for the Analysis of Multi-Environment Trials: I. An Inventory of Models. Euphytica, 84, 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01677551
Dias, C.T. and Krzanowski, W.J. (2003) Model Selection and Cross Validation in Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction Models. Crop Science, 43, 865-873. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.8650
Henderson, C.R. (1975) Best Linear Estimation and Prediction under a Selection Model. Biometrics, 31, 423-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529430
Smith, A.B., Cullis, B.R. and Thompson, R. (2005) The Analysis of Crop Cultivar Breeding and Evaluation Trials: An Overview of Current Mixed Model Approaches. Journal of Agricultural Science, 143, 449-462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859605005587
Resende, M.D.V. (2007) Estimação e predição em modelos lineares mistos. In: Resende, M.D.V., Ed., Matemática e estatística na análise de experimentos e no melhoramento genético, Embrapa Florestas, Colombo, 101-170.
Piepho, H.-P., Möhring, J., Melchinger, A.E. and Büchse, A. (2008) BLUP for Phenotypic Selection in Plant Breeding and Variety Testing. Euphytica, 161, 209-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10681-007-9449-8
Bajpai, P.K. and Kumar, R. (2005) Comparison of Methods for Studying Genotype × Environment Interaction in Sugarcane. Sugar Tech, 7, 129-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02950597
Bastos, I.T., Barbosa, M.H.P., Resende, M.D.V., Peternelli, L.A., Silveira, L.C.I., Donda, L.R., Fortunato, A.A., Costa, P.M.A. and Figueiredo, I.C.R. (2007) Evaluation of Genotype versus Environment Interaction in Sugarcane Using Mixed Models. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, 37, 195-203.
Silva, M.A. (2008) Genotype × Environment Interaction and Phenotypic Stability in Sugarcane under a Twelve-Months Planting Cycle. Bragantia, 67, 109-117.
Guerra, E.P., Oliveira, R.A., Daros, E., Zambon, J.L.C., Ido, O.T. and Bespalhok Filho, J.C. (2009) Stability and Adaptability of Early Maturing Sugarcane Clones by AMMI Analysis. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 9, 260-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.12702/1984-7033.v09n03a08
Piepho, H.-P. (1994) Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) for Regional Yield Trials: A Comparison to Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction (AMMI) Analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 89, 647-654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00222462
Annicchiarico, P. (1997) Joint Regression vs AMMI Analysis of Genotype-Environment Interactions for Cereals in Italy. Euphytica, 94, 53-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1002954824178
Duarte, J. B. and Vencovsky, R. (1999) Interação genótipos × ambientes: Uma introdução à análise “AMMI”. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética, Ribeirão Preto.
Yang, R.-C., Crossa, J., Cornelius, P.L. and Burgueño, J. (2009) Biplot Analysis of Genotype × Environment Interaction: Proceed with Caution. Crop Science, 49, 1564-1576. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.11.0665
Malosetti, M., Ribaut, J.M. and van Eeuwijk, F.A. (2013) The Statistical Analysis of Multi-Environment Data: Modeling Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Its Genetic Basis. Frontiers in Physiology, 4, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2013.00044
Yates, F. and Cochran, W.G. (1938) The Analysis of Groups of Experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, 28, 556-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600050978
Hogg, R.V. and Craig, A.T. (1965) Some Special Distributions. In: Hogg, R.V. and Craig, A.T., Eds., Introduction to Mathematical Statistics, 2nd Edition, Macmillan, New York, 103-104.
Bernardo, R. (2010) Genotype × Environment Interaction. In: Bernardo, R., Ed., Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants, Stemma Press, Woodbury, 177-203.
Crossa, J. (1990) Statistical Analyses of Multilocation Trials. Advances in Agronomy, 44, 55-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60818-4
Lavoranti, O.J., Dias, C.T.S. and Krzanowski, W.J. (2007) Phenotypic Stability via AMMI Model with Bootstrap Re-Sampling. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, 54, 45-52.
Balzarini, M. (2001) Applications of Mixed Models in Plant Breeding. In: Kang, M.S., Ed., Quantitative Genetics, Genomics and Plant Breeding, CABI Publishing, New York, 353-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851996011.0353
Lynch, M. and Walsh, B. (1997) Genotype × Environment Interaction. In: Lynch, M. and Walsh, B., Eds., Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits, Sinauer, Sunderland, 657-683.
R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/
Mendiburu, F. (2013). Agricolae: Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. R Package Version 1.1-4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae
Bates, D., Maechler, M. and Bolker, B. (2013) lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes. R Package Version 0.999999-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
Crossa, J., Fox, P.N., Pfeifer, W.H., Rajaram, J. and Gauch, H.G. (1991) AMMI Adjustment for Statistical Analysis of an International Wheat Yield Trial. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 81, 27-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00226108