A New Approach to Investigate Students’ Behavior by Using Cluster Analysis as an Unsupervised Methodology in the Field of Education — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
A New Approach to Investigate Students’ Behavior by Using Cluster Analysis as an Unsupervised Methodology in the Field of Education
University of Palermo Physics Education Research Group (UOP-PERG), Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italia
,
Mathematics Education Research Group (GRIM), Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italia
,
University of Palermo Physics Education Research Group (UOP-PERG), Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italia
1 University of Palermo Physics Education Research Group (UOP-PERG), Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italia
2 Mathematics Education Research Group (GRIM), Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italia
3 University of Palermo Physics Education Research Group (UOP-PERG), Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italia
The problem of taking a set of data and separating it into subgroups where the elements of each subgroup are more similar to each other than they are to elements not in the subgroup has been extensively studied through the statistical method of cluster analysis. In this paper we want to discuss the application of this method to the field of education: particularly, we want to present the use of cluster analysis to separate students into groups that can be recognized and characterized by common traits in their answers to a questionnaire, without any prior knowledge of what form those groups would take (unsupervised classification). We start from a detailed study of the data processing needed by cluster analysis. Then two methods commonly used in cluster analysis are before described only from a theoretical point a view and after in the Section 4 through an example of application to data coming from an open-ended questionnaire administered to a sample of university students. In particular we describe and criticize the variables and parameters used to show the results of the cluster analysis methods.
Bao, L. and Redish, E.F. (2006) Model Analysis: Representing and Assessing the Dynamics of Student Learning. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 2, Article ID: 010103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.2.010103
Mestre, J.P. (2002) Probing Adults’ Conceptual Understanding and Transfer of Learning via Problem Posing. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 23, 9-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0193-3973(01)00101-0
Redfors, A. and Ryder, J. (2001) University Physics Students’ Use of Models in Explanations of Phenomena Involving Interaction between Metals and Electromagnetic Radiation. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 1283-1301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500690110038620
Coates, A. and Ng, A.Y. (2012) Learning Feature Representations with K-Means. In: Montavon, G., Orr, G.B. and Muller, K.R., Eds., Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, 2nd Edition, Springer, Berlin, 561-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_30
Dayan, P. (1999) Unsupervised Learning. In: Wilson, R.A. and Keil, F., Eds., The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences Wilson, The MIT Press, London, 1-7.
Sathya, R. and Abraham, A. (2013) Comparison of Supervised and Unsupervised Learning Algorithms for Pattern Classification. International Journal of Advanced Research in Artificial Intelligence, 2, 34-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJARAI.2013.020206
Tryon, R.C. (1939) Cluster Analysis: Correlation Profile and Orthometric (Factor) Analysis for the Isolation of Unities in Mind and Personality. Edwards Brothers, Ann Arbor.
Sokal, R.R. and Sneath, P.H.A. (1963) Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman & Co., New York.
Ott, J. (1999) Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage. 3rd Edition, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Allen, D.N. and Goldstein, G. (Eds.) (2013) Cluster Analysis in Neuropsychological Research: 13 Recent Applications. Springer Science + Business Media, New York.
Mantegna, R.N. (1999) Hierarchical Structure in Financial Markets. European Physical Journal B, 11, 193-197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s100510050929
Cowgill, M.C. and Harvey, R.J. (1999) A Genetic Algorithm Approach to Cluster Analysis. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 37, 99-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00090-5
Everitt, B.S., Landau, S., Leese, M. and Stahl, D. (2011) Cluster Analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
Springuel, R.P., Wittmann, M.C. and Thompson, J.R. (2007) Applying Clustering to Statistical Analysis of Student Reasoning about Two-Dimensional Kinematics. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 3, Article ID: 020107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.3.020107
Fazio, C., Di Paola, B. and Guastella, I. (2012) Prospective Elementary Teachers’ Perceptions of the Processes of Modeling: A Case Study. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 8, Article ID: 010110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.8.010110
Fazio, C., Battaglia, O.R. and Di Paola, B. (2013) Investigating the Quality of Mental Models Deployed by Undergraduate Engineering Students in Creating Explanations: The Case of Thermally Activated Phenomena. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 9, Article ID: 020101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.9.020101
Ding, L. and Beichner, R. (2009) Approaches to Data Analysis of Multiple-Choice Questions. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 5, Article ID: 020103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.5.020103
Hammer, D. and Berland, L.K. (2014) Confusing Claims for Data: A Critique of Common Practices for Presenting Qualitative Research on Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 37-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.802652
Chi, M.T.H. (1997) Quantifying Qualitative Analyses of Verbal Data: A Practical Guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
Tumminello, M., Micciché, S., Dominguez, L.J., Lamura, G., Melchiorre, M.G., Barbagallo, M. and Mantegna, R.N. (2011) Happy Aged People Are All Alike, While Every Unhappy Aged Person Is Unhappy in Its Own. PLoS ONE, 6, e23377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0023377
Lerman, I.C., Gras, R. and Rostam, H. (1981) Elaboration et evaluation d’un indice d’implication pour des données binaires I. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 74, 5-35.
Gower, J.C. (1966) Some Distance Properties of Latent Root and Vector Methods Used in Multivariate Analysis. Biometrika Trust, 53, 325-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/53.3-4.325
MacQueen, J. (1967) Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 281-297.
Stewart, J., Miller, M., Audo, C. and Stewart, G. (2012) Using Cluster Analysis to Identify Patterns in Students’ Responses to Contextually Different Conceptual Problems. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 8, Article ID: 020112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevstper.8.020112
Rouseeuw, P.J. (1987) Silhouttes: A Graphical Aid to the Interpretation and Validation of Cluster Analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7
Saxena, P., Singh, V. and Lehri, S. (2013) Evolving Efficient Clustering Patterns in Liver Patient Data through Data Mining Techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 66, 23-28.
Struyf, A., Hubert, M. and Rousseeuw, P.J. (1997) Clustering in an Object-Oriented Environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 1, 1-30.
Borg, I. and Groenen, P. (1997) Modern Multidimensional Scaling. Springer, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2711-1
Di Paola, B., Battaglia, O.R. and Fazio, C. (2016) Non-Hierarchical Clustering to Analyse an Open-Ended Questionnaire on Algebraic Thinking. South African Journal of Education, 36, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.15700/saje.v36n1a1142
Battaglia, O.R. and Di Paola, B. (2015) A Quantitative Method to Analyse an Open Answer Questionnaire: A Case Study about the Boltzmann Factor. GIREP-MPTL 2014 Teching/Learning Physics: Integrating Research into Practice, University of Palermo, 7-12 July 2014.
Di Ciccio, T.J. and Efron, B. (1996) Bootstrap Confidence Intervals. Statistical Science, 11, 189-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/ss/1032280214
Inkley, D.V. (1997) Bootstrap Methods and Their Applications. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Sokal, R.R. and Rohlf, F.J. (1962) The Comparison of Dendrograms by Objective Methods. International Association for Plant Taxonomy, 11, 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1217208
Saracli, S., Dogan, N. and Dogan, I. (2013) Comparison of Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Methods by Cophenetic Correlation. Journal of Inequalities and Application, 2013, 203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1029-242X-2013-203
Springuel, R.P. (2010) Applying Cluster Analysis to Physics Education Research Data. PhD Thesis, the University of Maine, Orono. www.academia.edu
GhasemiGol, M., Yazdi, H.S. and Monsefi, R. (2010) A New Hierarchical Clustering Algorithm on Fuzzy Data (FHCA). International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 2, 134-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/IJCEE.2010.V2.126
Calinski, T. and Harabasz, J. (1974) A Dendrite Method for Cluster Analysis: Communications in Statistics. Theory and Methods, 3, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610927408827101
Meila, M. (2007) Comparing Clusterings—An Information Based Distance. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 98, 873-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2006.11.013
The MathWorks Inc (2015) MATLAB Version 8.6. Natick. www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/