Global Geometrical Constraints on the Shape of Proteins and Their Influence on Allosteric Regulation
- 1 Genocript, Zama, Japan
Abstract
Proteins are the workhorse molecules of the cell, which are obtained by folding long chains of amino acids. Since not all shapes are obtained as a folded chain of amino acids, there should be global geometrical constraints on the shape. Moreover, since the function of a protein is largely determined by its shape, constraints on the shape should have some influence on its interaction with other proteins. In this paper, we consider global geometrical constraints on the shape of proteins. Using a mathematical toy model, in which proteins are represented as closed chains of tetrahedrons, we have identified not only global geometrical constraints on the shape of proteins, but also their influence on protein interactions. As an example, we show that a garlic-bulb like structure appears as a result of the constraints. Regarding the influence of global geometrical constraints on interactions, we consider their influence on the structural coupling of two distal sites in allosteric regulation. We then show the inseparable relationship between global geometrical constraints and protein interactions; i.e . they are different sides of the same coin. This finding could be important for the understanding of the basic mechanisms of allosteric regulation of protein functions.
- Morikawa, N. (2014) Discrete Differential Geometry of n-Simplices and Protein Structure Analysis. Applied Mathematics, 5, 2458-2463. https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2014.516237
- Morikawa, N. (2017) Discrete Differential Geometry and the Structural Study of Protein Complexes. Open Journal of Discrete Mathematics, 7, 148-164. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojdm.2017.73014
- Saitoh, S., Nakai, T. and Nishikawa, K. (1993) A Geometrical Constraint Approach for Reproducing the Native Backbone Conformation of a Protein. Proteins, 15, 191-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340150209
- Ramachandran, G.N., Ramakrishnan, C. and Sasisekharan, V. (1963) Stereochemistry of Polypeptide Chain Configurations. Journal of Molecular Biology, 7, 95-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(63)80023-6
- Lund, O., Hansen, J., Brunak, S. and Bohr, J. (1996) Relationship between Protein Structure and Geometrical Constraints. Protein Science, 5, 2217-2225. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560051108
- Prasad, B.V. and Schmid, M.F. (2012) Principles of Virus Structural Organization. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 726, 17-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0980-9_3
- Keef, T., Wardman, J.P., Ranson, N.A., Stockley, P.G. and Twarock, R. (2013) Structural Constraints on the Three-Dimensional Geometry of Simple Viruses: Case Studies of a New Predictive Tool. Acta Crystallographica, Section A, A69, 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767312047150
- Mannige, R.V. and Brooks 3rd, C.L. (2008) Tilable Nature of Virus Capsids and the Role of Topological Constraints in Natural Capsid Design. Physical Review E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 77, Article ID: 051902. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.051902
- Monod, J. (1977) Chance and Necessity: Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. Penguin Books Ltd., London.
- Edelstein, S.J. (2013) Allosteric Interactions after 50 Years. Journal of Molecular Biology, 425, 1391-1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.03.026
- Laskowski, R.A., Gerick, F. and Thornton, J.M. (2009) The Structural Basis of Allosteric Regulation in Proteins. FEBS Letters, 583, 1692-1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2009.03.019
- Liu, J. and Nussinov, R. (2016) Allostery: An Overview of Its History, Concepts, Methods, and Applications. PLoS Computational Biology, 12, e1004966. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004966