Construction of Equivalent Functions in Anisotropic Radon Tomography
- 1 Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA
Abstract
We consider a real-valued function on a plane of the form m(x,y,θ)=A(x,y)+Bc(x,y)cos(2θ)+Bs(x,y)sin(2θ)+Cc(x,y)cos(4θ)Cs(x,y)sin(4θ) that models anisotropic acoustic slowness (reciprocal velocity) perturbations. This “slowness function” depends on Cartesian coordinates and polar angle θ. The five anisotropic “component functions” A (x,y), Bc(x,y), Bs(x,y), Cc(x,y) and Cs(x,y) are assumed to be real-valued Schwartz functions. The “travel time” function d(u, θ ) models the travel time perturbations on an indefinitely long straight-line observation path, where the line is parameterized by perpendicular distance u from the origin and polar angle θ; it is the Radon transform of m ( x, y, θ ) . We show that: 1) an A can always be found with the same d(u, θ ) as an arbitrary (B c ,B s ) and/or an arbitrary (C c ,C s ) ; 2) a (B c ,B s ) can always be found with the same d(u, θ ) as an arbitrary A, and furthermore, infinite families of them exist; 3) a (C c ,C s ) can always be found with the same d(u, θ ) as an arbitrary A, and furthermore, infinite families of them exist; 4) a (B c ,B s ) can always be found with the same d(u, θ ) as an arbitrary (C c ,C s ) , and vice versa; and furthermore, infinite families of them exist; and 5) given an arbitrary isotropic reference slowness function m 0 (x,y) , “null coefficients” (B c ,B s ) can be constructed for which d(u, θ ) is identically zero (and similarly for C c ,C s ). We provide explicit methods of constructing each of these “equivalent functions”.
- Hearn, T.M. (1996) Anisotropic Pn Tomography in the Western United States. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, 8403-8414. https://doi.org/10.1029/96JB00114
- Wu, H. and Lees, J.M. (1999) Cartesian Parameterization of Anisotropic Traveltime Tomography. Geophysical Journal International, 137, 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00778.x
- Pei, S., Zhao, J., Sun, Y., Xu, Z., Wang, S., Liu, H., Rowe, C.A., ToksÖz, M.N. and Gao, X. (2007) Upper Mantle Seismic Velocities And anisotropy in China Determined through Pn and Sn Tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, Article ID: B05312.
- Menke, W., Zha, Y., Webb, S.C. and Blackman, D.K. (2015) Seismic Anisotropy Indicates Ridge-Parallel Asthenospheric Flow beneath the Eastern Lau Spreading Center. Journal of Geophysical Research, 120, 976-992. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JB011154
- Eddy, C.L., EkstrÖm, G., Nettles, M. and Gaherty, J.B. (2018) Age Dependence and Anisotropy of Surface-Wave Phase Velocities in the Pacific. Geophysical Journal International, 216, 640-658. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy438
- Backus, G.E. (1965) Possible Form of Seismic Anisotropy of the Upper Mantle under the Oceans. Journal of Geophysical Research, 70, 3429-3439. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i014p03429
- Thomsen, L. (1986) Weak Elastic Anisotropy. Geophysics, 51, 1954-1966. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442051
- Aki, K. and Richards, P.G. (2009) Quantitative Seismology. 2nd Edition, University Science Books, Herndon, Virginia.
- Mochizuki, E. (1997) Nonuniqueness of Two-Dimensional Anisotropic Tomography. Seismological Society of America Bulletin, 87, 261-264.
- Menke, W. (2015) Equivalent Heterogeneity Analysis as a Tool for Understanding the Resolving Power of Anisotropic Travel Time Tomography. Seismological Society of America Bulletin, 105, 719-733. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140150
- Reed, M. and Simon. B. (1980) Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics: Functional Analysis I. Revised and Enlarged Edition, Academic Press, San Diego.
- HÖrmander, L. (1990) The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I. Distribution Theory and Fourier Analysis. 2nd Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
- Stein, E.M. and Shakarchi, R. (2003) Fourier Analysis: An Introduction. Princeton Lectures in Analysis I. Princeton University Press, Princeton New Jersey.