Killing Imaginary Numbers? From Today’s Asymmetric Number System to a Symmetric System
- 1 Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
- 2 Independent Researcher, New Delhi, India
Abstract
In this paper, we point out an interesting asymmetry in the rules of fundamental mathematics between positive and negative numbers. Further, we show an alternative numerical system identical to today’s system, but where positive numbers dominate over negative numbers. This is like a mirror symmetry of the existing number system. The asymmetry in both systems leads to imaginary and complex numbers. We also suggest an alternative number system with perfectly symmetrical rules—that is, where there is no dominance of negative numbers over positive numbers or vice versa, and where imaginary and complex numbers are no longer needed. This number system seems to be superior to other numerical systems, as it brings simplicity and logic back to areas that complex rules have dominated for much of the history of mathematics. Finally, we also briefly discuss how the Riemann hypothesis may be linked to the asymmetry in the current number system. The foundation rules of a number system can, in general, not be proven incorrect or correct inside the number system itself. However, the ultimate goal of a number system is, in our view, to describe nature accurately. The optimal number system should therefore be developed with feedback from nature. If nature, at a very fundamental level, is ruled by symmetry, then a symmetric number system should make it easier to understand nature than an asymmetric number system would. We hypothesize that a symmetric number system may thus be better suited to describing nature. Further, such a number system should eliminate imaginary numbers in space-time and quantum mechanics, for example, two areas of physics that are clouded in mystery to this day.
- Nahin, P.J. (1998) An Imaginary Tale: The Story of √-1. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
- Nikouravan, M. (2019) A Short History of Imaginary Numbers. International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences, 9, 1-5. https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/659813.pdf
- Cardano, G. (1545) Ars Magna or The Rules of Algebra. Dover Publications, New York.
- Dodge, C. (2004) Euclidean Geometry and Transformations. Dover Publications, New York.
- Kline, M. (1972) Mathematical Thought from Ancient to Modern Times. Volume 2, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Planck, M. (1899) Natuerliche Masseinheiten. Der Königlich Preussischen Akademie Der Wissenschaften, Berlin.
- Planck, M. (1906) Vorlesungen über die Theorie der Wärmestrahlung. Dover Publications, New York, 163.
- Haug, E.G. (2007) The Complete Guide To Option Pricing Formulas. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Svetunkov, S. (2012) Complex-Valued Modeling in Economics and Finance. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5876-0
- Dallago, R. and Facchinetti, B.R., Dallago, G. and Facchinetti. S. (2021) Black’s Model in a Negative Interest Rate Environment, with Application to OTC Derivatives. Computational Management Science, 2021.
- Haug, E.G. (2002) A Look in the Antimatter Mirror. Wilmott Magazine, Wiley Publishing, 38-42.
- Einstein, A. (1923) On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies. Annalen der Physik, 17, 891-921.
- Riemann, B. (1859) Ueber die Anzahl der Primzahlen unter einer gegebenen Grösse. Monatsberichte der Berliner Akademie. Gesammelte Werke, Teubner.
- Hilbert, D. (1902) Mathematical Problems. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 80, 437-479.
- Leclair, A. (2013) An Electrostatic Depiction of the Validity of the Riemann Hypothesis and a Formula for the Nth Zero at Large N. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 28, Article ID: 1350151. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X13501510
- Wolf, M. (2020) Will a Physicist Prove the Riemann Hypothesis? Reports on Progress in Physics, 83, Article ID: 036001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ab3de7
- Barbarani, V. (2020) A Quantum Model of the Distribution of Prime Numbers and the RIEMANN hypothesis. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 59, 2425-2470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-020-04512-2