Conditional Independence Leads to Satisfaction of the Bell Inequality without Assuming Non-Locality or Non-Reality
- 1 Institute for Quantum Studies, Chapman University, Orange, USA
- 2 Inspire Institute Inc., Alexandria, USA
Abstract
The original Bell inequality was obtained in a statistical derivation assuming three mutually cross-correlated random variables (four in the later version). Given that observations destroy the particles, the physical realization of three variables from an experiment producing two particles per trial requires two separate trial runs. One assumed variable value (for particle 1) occurs at a fixed instrument setting in both trial runs while a second variable (for particle 2) occurs at alternative instrument settings in the two trial runs. Given that measurements on the two particles occurring in each trial are themselves correlated, measurements from independent realizations at mutually exclusive settings on particle 2 are conditionally independent, i.e. , conditionally dependent on particle 1, through probability. This situation is realized from variables defined by Bell using entangled particle pairs. Two correlations have the form that Bell computed from entanglement, but a third correlation from conditionally independent measurements has a different form. When the correlations are computed using quantum probabilities, the Bell inequality is satisfied without recourse to assumptions of non-locality, or non-reality.
- Bell, J. (1988) Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Aspect, A. (2004) Introduction: John Bell and the Second Quantum Revolution in Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Drummond, B. (2019) Understanding Quantum Mechanics: A Review and Synthesis in Precise Language. Open Physics, 17, 390-437. https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2019-0045
- Sica, L. (1999) Bell’s Inequalities I: An Explanation for Their Experimental Violation. Optics Communications, 170, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(99)00417-4
- Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H. and Zeilinger A. (1998) Violation of Bell’s Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions. Physical Review Letters, 81, 5039-5043. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.5039
- Papoulis, A. and Pillai, U. (2002) Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes. 4th Edition, McGraw Hill, Boston.
- Born, M. and Wolf, E. (1999) Principles of Optics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 547. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644181
- De Raedt, H., Jattana, M.S., Willsch, D., Willsch, M., Jin, F. and Michielsen, K. (2020) Discrete-Event Simulation of an Extended Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Experiment. Frontiers in Physics, 8, 160. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00160
- Mandl, F. (1992) Quantum Mechanics. Chapter 5. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester.
- Goldstein, H. (1980) Classical Mechanics. Addison Wesley Publishing Co. Inc., p. 156.
- Papoulis, A. (1965) Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. Mc-Graw-Hill, p. 238.
- Sica, L. (2002) Correlations for a New Bell’s Inequality Experiment. Foundations of Physics Letters, 15, 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023920230595
- Sica, L. (2020) The Bell Inequalities: Identifying What Is Testable and What Is Not. Journal of Modern Physics, 11, 725-740. https://doi.org/10.4236/jmp.2020.115047