Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Completion of the Proof of the Contradiction of Set Theory
Mountain View, CA, USA
- 1 Mountain View, CA, USA
Advances in Pure Mathematics·Volume 14 (2024)·Pages 807–816·Published 5 November 2024·DOI10.4236/apm.2024.1411045
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
The article is devoted to completing the proof of the inconsistency of set theory. In this article and in the two preceding ones, all steps of the proof are based on generally accepted informal set-theoretic reasoning, but consider the prohibitions that were included in axiomatic set theories in order to overcome the difficulties encountered by the naive Cantor set theory. Therefore, in fact, the articles are about proving the inconsistency of existing axiomatic set theories, in particular, the ZFC theory.
KeywordsSet TheoryInconsistencyTreeStrange TreeThrough WayAlmost through WayIsomorphismAlmost IsomorphismIsomorphism TreePlace PlaneSuperposition (Imposition) of Trees on the Place PlaneDisposition of Trees on the Place Plane
- Cohen, P.J. (1966) Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. Publisher Dover Publications, New York.
- Volin, Y.M. (2023) About the Strange Tree Paradox and Possible Inconsistency of Set Theory. Advances in Pure Mathematics , 13, 694-713. https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2023.1310048
- Volin, Y.M. (2024) On the Proof of the Contradiction of Set Theory. Advances in Pure Mathematics , 14, 139-159. https://doi.org/10.4236/apm.2024.143007
- Crary, J.R. (2024) Proof of Concept for a Twin Prime Number Universe Using Set Theory. American Journal of Computational Mathematics , 14, 305-317. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcm.2024.143014