Stochastic Modeling and Assisted History-Matching Using Multiple Techniques of Multi-Phase Flowback from Multi-Fractured Horizontal Tight Oil Wells
- 1 Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- 2 Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Abstract
In this paper, the methods developed by [1] are used to analyze flowback data, which involves modeling flow both before and after the breakthrough of formation fluids. Despite the versatility of these techniques, achieving an optimal combination of parameters is often difficult with a single deterministic analysis. Because of the uncertainty in key model parameters, this problem is an ideal candidate for uncertainty quantification and advanced assisted history-matching techniques, including Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and genetic algorithms (GAs) amongst others. MC simulation, for example, can be used for both the purpose of assisted history-matching and uncertainty quantification of key fracture parameters. In this work, several techniques are tested including both single-objective (SO) and multi-objective (MO) algorithms for history-matching and uncertainty quantification, using a light tight oil (LTO) field case. The results of this analysis suggest that many different algorithms can be used to achieve similar optimization results, making these viable methods for developing an optimal set of key uncertain fracture parameters. An indication of uncertainty can also be achieved, which assists in understanding the range of parameters which can be used to successfully match the flowback data.
- Clarkson, C.R., Qanbari, F. and Williams-Kovacs, J.D. (2014) Innovative Use of Rate-Transient Analysis Methods to Obtain Hydraulic-Fracture Properties for Low-Permeability Reservoirs Exhibiting Multi-Phase Flow. The Leading Edge, 33, 1108-1122. https://doi.org/10.1190/tle33101108.1
- Williams-Kovacs, J.D. (2017) Quantitative Analysis of Multi-Phase Flowback from Multi-Fractured Horizontal Wells. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
- Ezulike, D.O., Dehghanpour, H., Virues, C.J., Hawkes, R.V. and Jones Jr., R.S. (2016) Flowback Fracture Closure: A Key Factor for Estimating Effective Pore Volume. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 19, 567-582. https://doi.org/10.2118/175143-PA
- Kanfar, M.S. and Clarkson, C.R. (2016) Reconciling Flowback and Production Data: A Novel History Matching Approach for Liquids Rich Shale Wells. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 33, 1134-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.042
- Pruess, K. (1985) A Practical Method for Modeling Fluid and Heat Flow in Fractured Porous Media. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 25, 14-26. https://doi.org/10.2118/10509-PA
- Palisade Corporation (2015) @RISKTM User’s Guide: Risk Analysis and Simulation Add-In for Microsoft ® ExcelTM. Palisade Corporation, Ithaca, NY.
- Lasdon, L.S., Waren, A.D., Jain, A. and Ratner, M. (1978) Design and Testing of a Generalized Reduced Gradient Code for Nonlinear Programming. ACM Transactions in Mathematical Software, 4, 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1145/355769.355773
- Arun, C. and Tayo, O.A. (2014) Design and Optimization of Single Span Fixed-Feet Portal Frame Using Generalized Reduced Gradient. Civil and Environmental Research, 6, 20-29.
- Laguna, M. (2011) OptQuest: Optimization of Complex Systems. OpTek Systems Inc., Greenville, SC.
- Frontline Solvers (2016) Optimization and Simulation User Guide. Frontline Systems Inc., Incline Village, Nevada.
- Palisade Corporation (2015) EvolverTM User’s Guide: The Genetic Algorithm Solver for Microsoft ® ExcelTM. Palisade Corporation, Ithaca, NY.
- Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. and Meyarivan, T. (2002) A Fast and Elitist Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6, 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017
- Srinivas, N. and Deb, K. (2007) Multiobjective Optimization Using Nondominated Sorting in Genetic Algorithms. Evolutionary Computation, 2, 221-248. https://doi.org/10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221