The Comparative Performance of Soil-Based Systems with Hydroponics
- 1 Department of Ecology and Environmental Studies, The Water School, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA
- 2 Department of Marine and Earth Sciences, The Water School, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA
- 3 Department of Ecology and Environmental Studies, The Water School, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA
- 4 Department of Natural Resources, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- 5 Department of Ecology and Environmental Studies, The Water School, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA
- 6 Department of Mathematics, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA
- 7 Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering, Mercer University, Macon, GA, USA
- 8 Independent Researcher, Alexandria, VA, USA
- 9 Department of Ecology and Environmental Studies, The Water School, Florida Gulf Coast University, Fort Myers, FL, USA
Abstract
Conventional soil-based agriculture is resource-intensive, utilizing large amounts of land and water, thereby placing a strain on Earth’s natural resources. Soil-based agricultural techniques create environmental issues such as soil degradation, deforestation, and groundwater pollution from the mass implementation of fertilizers and pesticides. Agricultural crop production using hydroponics has shown promise to be less resource intensive and provide a faster turnaround in crop production. Soilless cultivation using hydroponics promises to relieve some pressure on Earth’s ecosystems and resources by utilizing lesser land and water footprint. The APS Laboratory for Sustainable Food at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) compared the growth of Lettuce Lactuca sativa “Rex Butterhead” crop grown using soil and soilless methods to analyze the growth performance in each setting. Crops grown in the soil-based medium were raised in the FGCU Food Forest, used a mix of soil and potting mix, watered regularly, and followed standard Integrated Pest Management (IPM) practices. Crops grown hydroponically were grown in a thermally insulated grow tent with an artificial lighting source, ventilation, environmental controls, and the Deep-Water Culture (DWC) method. Lettuce plugs were grown for 15 days in controlled environments until two leaves after the cotyledons had developed and were ready for transplant. Plugs were transplanted into a 4 × 6 matrix at the FGCU Food Forest and the DWC growth system. Crops were grown to full bloom and ready for harvest in the soil (60 days) and soilless (30 days) based setups. We collected crop growth data, including wet weight (g), dry weight (g), leaf area (cm 2 ), and chlorophyll concentration (μmol/m 2 ). From the collected data, we derived the Specific Leaf Area (SLA, cm 2 /g) and biomass productivity (kg/m 2 ). Descriptive statistics were used to describe the collected and derived data. We investigated the slopes of regression lines for each growth curve which derived the differences in biomass and productivity parameters between lettuce grown using soil and hydroponics. Both growing methods can grow lettuce crops to full bloom and to adequate harvest weight. The biomass parameters and productivity differ significantly between the growing methods. The lettuce crops grown using hydroponics increase in wet weight statistically and significantly faster than those grown in soil (p < 0.0001). Therefore, we determined that a hydroponic method of crop production may provide better crop output and biomass indicators measured than soil-based growth.
- Kloas, W., Groß, R., Baganz, D., Graupner, J., Monsees, H., Schmidt, U., Staaks, G., Suhl, J., Tschirner, M., Wittstock, B., Wuertz, S., Zikova, A. and Rennert, B. (2015) A New Concept for Aquaponic Systems to Improve Sustainability, Increase Productivity, and Reduce Environmental Impacts. Aquaculture Environment Interactions, 7, 179-192. https://doi.org/10.3354/aei00146
- Ortiz-Bobea, A., Ault, T.R., Carrillo, C.M., Chambers, R.G. and Lobell, D.B. (2021) Anthropogenic Climate Change Has Slowed Global Agricultural Productivity Growth. Nature Climate Change, 11, 306-312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01000-1
- Taghizadeh, R. (2021) Assessing the Potential of Hydroponic Farming to Reduce Food Imports: The Case of Lettuce Production in Sweden. Master’s Thesis, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
- Kozai, T. (2018) Current Status of Plant Factories with Artificial Lighting (PFALs) and Smart PFALs. In: Kozai, T., Ed., Smart Plant Factory: The Next Generation Indoor Vertical Farms, Springer, Singapore, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1065-2_1
- Conforti, P., Alexandratos, N., Anriquez, G., Baffes, J., Beintema, N., Boedeker, G. and Bruinsma, J. (2011) World Food and Agriculture to 2030/2050 Revisited. Highlights and Views Four Years Later. In Looking Ahead in World Food and Agriculture: Perspectives to 2050. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2280e/i2280e.pdf
- Pison, G. (2017) Tous les pays du monde. Population & Sociétés, 547, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.3917/popsoc.547.0001
- Liu, C., Wu, J., Raudales, R., McAvoy, R., Theobald, D. and Yang, X. (2018) An Experimental Study on Energy and Water Uses of A Newly Developed Greenbox Farming System. 2018 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Detroit, 29 July-1 August 2018, 2-9. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.201800891
- Singh, A.K., Bravo-Ureta, B. and Yang, X. (2022) Financial Feasibility Study of GREENBOX Technology for Crop Production in an Urban Setting. 2022 ASABE Annual International Meeting, Houston, 17-20 July 2022, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.202201068
- Singh, A.K., McAvoy, R.J., Bravo-Ureta, B. and Yang, X. (2021) An Experimental Study on GREENBOX Technology: Feasibility and Performance. 2021 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting, 12-16 July 2021, 145-166. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.202100453
- Singh, A.K., McAvoy, R.J., Bravo-Ureta, B. and Yang, X. (2021) Comparison of Environmental Condition, Productivity, and Resources Use between GREENBOX and Greenhouse for Growing Lettuce. 2021 ASABE Annual International Virtual Meeting, 12-16 July 202, 2-10. https://doi.org/10.13031/aim.202100455