Characterisation of Smallholder Multiple Livestock Species Production Systems in Parts of Lake Victoria Crescent of Central Uganda
- 1 Department of Agricultural Production, Kyambogo University, Kyambogo, Uganda
- 2 Department of Livestock and Industrial Resources, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 3 Department of Wild Life and Aquatic Resources, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 4 Department of Wild Life and Aquatic Resources, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
Abstract
A cross-sectional study of 150 purposively selected multiple livestock species farmers was conducted in Central Uganda aimed at distinguishing between mixed and integrated livestock systems. Performance and operational-based challenges misconstrued to cause incorrect comparison between the two systems were considered. Ten multiple-livestock species system with five ruminant species-based and five monogastric species-based combinations were categorised. Poultry, pig, fish, goats and sheep kept in both the 3 and 4-species combinations were considered. Over 80% of the families are male dominated, smallholder and occupying > 1.0 Ha of land. Exotic and crossbred breeds were adopted away from less productive and noncommercial local species. Mixed monogastric-fish systems with monogastric species dominated (P < 0.05) the choices in the ten categories. Over five year experience in integrated livestock techniques transformed 30% of the farmers into integrated monogastric-ruminant-fish systems. Over reliance on conventional and expensive feeds was highly associated (X 2 = 25.93) with increased production expenses which significantly (P < 0.001) reduce production. Cattle and small ruminants are majorly reared on small scale zero-grazing system of less than 5.0 stock per household. Fish gained prominence with 37% of the farmers operating at medium scale of 500-1000 stock per farm. Poultry species are mainly kept on deep litter and cage systems which elevated 14.7% of the farmers to large scale with (>1000) stock per farm. Stalls dominate pig management systems with 15% of the farmers upgraded to commercial level with (>50) stock per farm. Ineffective livestock policies contribute to inefficient performance of 55% of livestock farmers. In conclusion, mixed livestock systems should be upgraded to integrated livestock systems with input resource synergy for improved production and sustainability.
- Nyambo, D.G., Luhanga, E.T. and Yonah, Z.Q. (2019) A Review of Characterization Approaches for Smallholder Farmers: Towards Predictive Farm Typologies. Scientific World Journal, 2019, Article ID: 6121467. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6121467
- LVBC (2007) Shared Vision and Strategy Framework for Management and Development of Lake Victoria Basin. Popular Version.
- LVFO (2014) Status of Fish Stocks in Lake Victoria. Stock Assessment Regional Working Group Report.
- Steinfeld, H.T., Wassenaar, T. and Jutz, S. (2006) Livestock Production Systems in Developing Countries: Status, Drivers, Trends. International Office of Epizootics. Scientific and Technical Review, 25, 505-516. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.25.2.1677
- Khalid, U.B., Shahbaz, P., Haq, S.U. and Javeed, S. (2017) Economic Analysis of Integrated Farming Systems on Farm Income. A Case Study of Sahiwal District, Punjab, Pakistan. International Journal of Management and Economics Invention, 11, 1434-1444. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijmei/v3i11.07
- CARDI (2010) A Manual on Integrated Farming Systems (IFS). In Agriculture Enterprise Development for Rural Belize. Caribbean Agricultural Research and Development Institute, Tobago.
- Sahoo, U.K. and Singh, S.L. (2015) Integrated Fish-Pig and Fish-Poultry Farming in East Kalcho, Saiha District of Mizoram, North-East India: An Economic Analysis. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 5, 281-286.
- Menezes, A. and Hishamunda, N. (2016) Promoting Agricultural Diversification to Reduce Poverty, Fight Malnutrition and Enhance Youth Employment Opportunities in Eastern Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization Aquaculture News Letter, 55, 42-43.
- Dalsgaard, J.P.T., Dickson, M., Jagwe, J. and Longley, C. (2012) Uganda Aquaculture Value Chains: Strategic Planning Mission Report. World Fish. 14.
- Haobijam, J.W. and Souvik, G. (2018) Integrated Pig-Fish Farming: A Case Study in Imphal West District of Manipur. The Pharma Innovation Journal, 7, 495-499.
- Renggaman, A., Choi, H., Sudiarto, I.A.S., Alasaarela, L. and Nam, O.S. (2015) Development of Pig Welfare Assessment Protocol Integrating Animal Environment and Management-Based Measures. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 57, Article No. 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40781-014-0034-0
- Temple, D., Courboulay, V., Manteca, X., Velarde, A. and Dalmau, A. (2012) The Welfare of Growing Pigs in the Different Production Systems: Assessment of Feeding and Housing. Animal, 6, 656-667. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001868