We are evaluating dryland cotton production in Martin County, Texas, measuring cotton lint yield per unit of rainfall. Our goal is to collect rainfall data per 250 - 400 ha. Upon selection of a rainfall gauge, we realized that the cost of using, for example, a tipping bucket-type rain gauge would be too expensive and thus searched for an alternative method. We selected an all-in-one commercially available weather station; hereafter, referred to as a Personal Weather Station (PWS) that is both wireless and solar powered. Our objective was to evaluate average measurements of rainfall obtained with the PWS and to compare these to measurements obtained with an automatic weather station (AWS). For this purpose, we installed four PWS deployed within 20 m of the Plant Stress and Water Conservation Meteorological Tower that was used as our AWS, located at USDA-ARS Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, Lubbock, TX. In addition, we measured and compared hourly average values of short-wave irradiance (R g ), air temperature (T air ) and relative humidity (RH), and wind speed (WS), and calculated values of dewpoint temperature (T dew ). This comparison was done over a 242-day period (1 October 2022-31 May 2023) and results indicated that there was no statistical difference in measurements of rainfall between the PWS and AWS. Hourly average values of R g measured with the PWS and AWS agreed on clear days, but PWS measurements were higher on cloudy days. There was no statistical difference between PWS and AWS hourly average measurements of T air , RH, and calculated T dew . Hourly average measurements of R g and WS were more variable. We concluded that the PWS we selected will provide adequate values of rainfall and other weather variables to meet our goal of evaluating dryland cotton lint yield per unit rainfall.
Mahan, J.R., and Lascano, R.J. (2016) Irrigation Analysis Based on Long-Term Weather Data. Agriculture, 6, Article 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture6030042
Hecht, A.D. (1983) Drought in the Great Plains: History of Societal Response. Journal of Applied Climatology and Meteorology, 22, 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022 2.0.CO;2
Mahmood, R., Boyles, R., Brinson, K., Fiebrich, C., Foster, S., Hubbard, K., Robinson, D., Andresen, J. and Leathers, D. (2017) MESONETS: Mesoscale Weather and Climate Observations for the United States. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 98, 1349-1361. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00258.1
Stewart, J.I. and Hash, C.T. (1982) Impact of Weather Analysis on Agricultural Production and Planning Decisions for the Semiarid Areas of Kenya. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 21, 477-494. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26180430 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1982)021 2.0.CO;2
Vanderlinden, K., Giráldez, J.V. and Meirvenne, M.V. (2004) Assessing Reference Evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves Method in Southern Spain. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 130, 184-191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:3(184)
Koh, T.Y. and Teo, C.K. (2009) Toward a Mesoscale Observation Network in Southeast Asia. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90, 481-488. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2561.1
Zhang, Y., Leuning, R., Chiew, F.H.S., Wang, E., Zhang, L., Liu, C., Sun, F., Peel, M.C., Shen, Y. and Jung, M. (2012) Decadal Trends in Evaporation from Global Energy and Water Balances. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13, 379-391. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-11-012.1
Bell, S.J. (2014) Quantifying Uncertainty in Citizen Weather Data. Ph.D. Thesis, Aston University, Birmingham.
Bell, S., Cornford, D. and Bastin, L. (2015) How Good Are Citizen Weather Stations? Addressing a Biased Opinion. Weather, 70, 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.2316
Bruns, J., Riesterer, J., Wang, B., Riedell, T. and Beigl, M. (2018) Automated Quality Assessment of (Citizen) Weather Stations. Journal for Geographic Information Science, 6, 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1553/giscience2018_01_s65
Hubbard, K.G. and Hollinger, S.E. (2005) Standard Meteorological Measurements. In: Micrometeorological in Agricultural Systems, Agronomy Monograph, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Vol. 47, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr47.c1
Lascano, R.J., Payton, P., Mahan, J.R., Goebel, T.S. and Gitz III, D.C. (2022) Annual Rainfall and Dryland Cotton Lint Yield—Southern High Plains of Texas. Agricultural Sciences, 13, 177-200. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2022.132014
Sellers, W.D. (1965) Physical Climatology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Eagleson, P.S. (1978) Climate, Soil and Vegetation. 1. Introduction to Water Balance Dynamics. Water Resources Research, 14, 705-712. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR014i005p00705
Schroeder, J.L., Burgett, W.S., Haynie, K.B., Sonmez, I., Skwira, G.D., Doggett, A.L. and Lipe, J.W. (2005) The West Texas Mesonet: A Technical Overview. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 72, 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-1690.1
Horton, R.E. (1919) The Measurement of Rainfall and Snow. Monthly Weather Review, 47, 294-296. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1919)47 2.0.CO;2
DeFelice, T.P. (1998) An Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Measurement. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
Cauteruccio, A., Colli, M., Stagnaro, M., Lanza, L.G. and Vuerich, E. (2021) In-situ Precipitation Measurements. In: Foken, T., Ed., Springer Handbook of Atmospheric Measurements, Springer, Cham, 359-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52171-4_12
Liu, X.C., Gao, T.C. and Liu, L. (2013) A Comparison of Rainfall Measurements from Multiple Instruments. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 6, 1585-1595. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1585-2013
Ham, J.M. (2005) Useful Equations and Tables in Micrometeorology. In: Hatfield, J.L. and Baker, J.M., Eds., Micrometeorological in Agricultural Systems, American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, 533-560. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr47.c23
Trilles, S., Juan, P., Díaz-Avalos, C., Ribeiro, S. and Painho, M. (2020) Reliability Evaluation of the Data Acquisition Potential of a Low-Cost Climatic Network for Applications in Agriculture. Sensors, 20, Article 6597. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226597
Bell, S., Cornford, D. and Bastin, L. (2013) The State of Automated Amateur Weather Stations. Weather, 68, 36-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.1980
Velasco-Martínez, V.D., Flores-García, F.G., González-Cervantes, G., Flores-Medina, M. and Moreno-Casillas, H.A. (2015) Development and Validation of a Low Price Automatic Weather Station for Agriculture. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 6, 1253-1264.
Bárdossy, A., Seidel, J. and El Hachem, A. (2021) The Use of Personal Weather Station Observations to Improve Precipitation Estimation and Interpolation. Hydrology and. Earth System Sciences, 25, 583-601. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-583-2021
de Vos, L.W., Leijnse, H., Overeem, A. and Uijlenhoet, R. (2019) Quality Control for Crowdsourced Personal Weather Stations to Enable Operational Rainfall Monitoring. Geophysical Research Letters, 46, 8820-8829. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL083731
Fritschen, L.J. and Gay, L.W. (1979) Environmental Instrumentation. Springer-Verlag, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-6205-3
Dombrowski, O., Hendricks-Franssen, H.J., Brogi, C. and Bogena, H.R. (2021) Performance of the ATMOS41 All-in-One Weather Station for Weather Monitoring. Sensors, 21, Article 741. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030741
Jenkins, G. (2014) A Comparison between Two Types of Widely Used Weather Stations. Royal Meteorological Society, 69, 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1002/wea.2158
Kingsley, E., Samuel, O.A., Isaac, C.A. and Esosa, E. (2017) Approximation of the Dew Point Temperature Using a Cost Effective Weather Monitoring System. Physical Science International Journal, 14, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.9734/PSIJ/2017/32862
Hahn, C., Garcia-Marti, I., Sugier, J., Emsley, F., Beaulant, A.L., Oram, L., Strandberg, E., Lindgren, E., Sunter, M. and Ziska, F. (2022) Observations from Personal Weather Stations—EUMETNET Interests and Experience. Climate, 10, Article 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli10120192