Performance Assessment of Some Flax (<i>Linum usitatissimum</i> L.) Varieties Using Cluster Analysis under Sandy Soil Conditions
- 1 Field Crops Research Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt
- 2 Field Crops Research Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt
- 3 Field Crops Research Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt
- 4 Field Crops Research Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Egypt
Abstract
To assess the performance and the variability of 49 flax varieties based on agronomic parameters using cluster analysis, a field experiment was conducted in 2011/2012 and 2012/2013 winter seasons at the farm of the National Research Center at Nubria district, Albehira Governorate, Egypt. The results revealed high significant difference among all flax varieties in all the studied characters. Letwania-9 and Evelen cultivars surpassed all other varieties in seed and oil yields/fed. On the other hand, D variety gave the lowest value of seed yield/fed and F variety gave the lowest values of oil% and oil yield/fed. While, G Variety surpassed all other varieties in straw yield/fed. Blanka variety recorded the lowest values of straw yield/fed and biological yield/fed, while, Posna variety gave the lowest values of technical stem length (cm). In cluster analysis, all the studied characters were used to construct a distance matrix using the Euclidian coefficient, and generate dendrogram showing dissimilarity among all the varieties. Distance coefficient was ranged from 1.2 between Piltstar and Litwania-1 varieties and 10.8 between Posna and G varieties, which reveal the genetic diversity among varieties. The varieties can be divided into 4 groups based on cluster analysis.
- Berger, J. (1969) In the World’s Major Fiber Crops their Cultivation and Manuring. Part 1, Flax, 209-213.
- O’connor, B.J. and Gusta, L.V. (1993) Effect of Low Temperature and Seeding Depth on the Germination and Emergence of Seven Flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) Cultivars. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 74, 247-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps94-050
- Hussein, M.M.M. (2007) Response of Some Flax Varieties to Bio and Nitrogen Fertilization. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research, 34, 815-844.
- Ibrahim, H.M. (2009) Effect of Sowing Date and N-Fertilizer Levels on Seed Yield, Some Yield Components and Oil Content in Flax. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Research, 54, 19-28.
- El-Shimy, G.M., Mostafa, S.H.A. and Zedan, S.Z. (1997) Studies on Yield, Yield Components, Quality and Variability in Some Flax Varieties. Egyptian Journal of Agricultural Research, 75, 697-715.
- Kineber, M.E.A. and El-Kady, E.A.F. (1996) Response of Some Promising Flax Varieties to Soil Salinity. Proceedings of 7th Conference Agronomy, Mansoura, 2, 369-378.
- El-Sweify, A.H.H., Tag El-Din, M.A. and Sharaf El-Deen, H.A.M. (2003) Effect of Some Flax Varieties and Harvesting Dates on Seed Chemical Composition, Yield and Fiber Quality. Annals of Agricultural Science, 41, 19-37.
- Abd El-Fatah, A.A.E. (2007) Comparative Study on Some Flax Cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Science, 32, 7111-7119.
- El-Kady, E.A.F. and Abd El-Fatah, A.A.E. (2009) Comparison of Yield, Its Components, Physical Properties and Chemical Composition of Twelve Flax Varieties. Journal of Agricultural Research, 35, 69-85.
- El-Hariri, D.M., Hassanein, M.S. and Ahmed, M.A. (1998) Evaluation of Different Flax Varieties under Egyptian conditions. Proceedings Bast Fibrous Plants Today and Tomorrow, N. I. Vavilou Res. INS. Industry (VIR) St. Petersburg, Russia.
- El-Hariri, D.M, Hassanein, M.S. and El-Sweify, A.H. (2004) Evaluation of Same Flax Varieties, Straw Yield, Yield Components and Technological Characters. Agricultural Research, 75, 697-715.
- Peters, J.P. and Martinelli, J.A. (1989) Hierarchical Cluster Analysis as a Tool to Manage Variation in Germplasm Collections. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 78, 42-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00299751
- Murphy, J.P., Cox, T.S. and Rodgers, D.M. (1986) Cluster Analysis of Red Winter Wheat Cultivars Based upon Coefficients of Parentage. Crop Science, 26, 672-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600040006x