In the information age, the cyber-attacks have increased manifold, and developing a cyber-security legal framework is the need of the hour. Saudi Arabia experiences the highest cyber-attacks in the Arab region. This research attempts to develop a cyber-security legal framework for Saudi Arabia in particular and other countries in general. The study uses coercive, normative, and mimetic forces of institutional theory for this endeavor. Coercive pressure manifests in legal instruments, so countries like Saudi Arabia need to ensure compliance of their organizations to their respective laws, regulations, security policies, and procedures. Normative force manifests in professional networks and community expectations. So, countries like Saudi Arabia should collaborate, share information with other countries and join the Budapest Convention to combat cyber-crimes. Saudi Arabia should sufficiently incorporate the provisions of the Arab Convention on Combating Information Technology Offences in its legal instruments. Mimetic force involves copying the actions and practices of successful organizations. So, countries like Saudi Arabia should improve their legal tools by incorporating key features of legal instruments of more advanced cyber-secure nations like the UK, USA, Singapore, etc. Specifically, Saudi Arabia should improve its legal tools in the areas of privacy, identity theft, cyber-bullying, etc.
KeywordsCyber-AttacksCyber-CrimesCyber-SecurityInstitutional TheoryAnti-Cyber Crime Law
ACCITO (9 March 2015). Arab Convention on Combating Information Technology Offences. https://www.asianlaws.org/gcld/cyberlawdb/GCC/Arab%20Convention%20on%20 Combating%20Information%20Technology%20Offences.pdf
Alazab, M., & Chon, S. (2015). Cyber Security in the Gulf Cooperation Council. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2594624
Alelyani, S., & Harish Kumar, G. R. (2018). Overview of Cyberattack on Saudi Organizations. Journal of Information Security and Cybercrimes Research, 1, 42-50. https://doi.org/10.26735/16587790.2018.004
Al-Hussein, I. (2 May 2017). 60 Million Cyber-Attacks Targeted Saudi Arabia in One Year. https://english.alarabiya.net/en/media/digital/2017/05/02/60-million-cyber-attacks-targeted- Saudi-Arabia-in-one-year
Alkalbani, A., Deng, H., Kam, B., & Zhang, X. (2017). Information Security Compliance in Organizations: An Institutional Perspective. Data and Information Management, 1, 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1515/dim-2017-0006
Alshammari, T. S., & Singh, H. P. (2018). Preparedness of Saudi Arabia to Defend Against Cyber Crimes: An Assessment with Reference to Anti-Cyber Crime Law and GCI Index. Archives of Business Research, 6, 131-146. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.612.5771
Anti-Cyber Crime Law (2007). Communications and Information Technology Commission. https://www.citc.gov.sa/en/RulesandSystems/CITCSystem/Pages/CybercrimesAct.aspx
Appari, A., Johnson, M. E., & Anthony, D. L. (2009). HIPAA Compliance: An Institutional Theory Perspective. Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Francisco, CA 6-9 August 2009, 252-261.
Arab News (29 September 2017). Study: 60% of Saudi Institutions Hit by Virus Attacks, Malware. https://www.arabnews.com/node/1169846/saudi-arabia
Bell, J. (21 July 2018). KSA Must Become More Resilient against Cyberattacks. https://www.arabnews.com/node/1343151/saudi-arabia
Björck, F. (2004). Institutional Theory: A New Perspective for Research into IS/IT Security in Organisations. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Big Island, HI, 5-8 January 2004, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265444
Breu, R., Innerhofer-Oberperfler, F., & Yautsiukhin, A. (2008). Quantitative Assessment of Enterprise Security System. 2008 3rd International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, Barcelona, 4-7 March 2008, 921-928. https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2008.164
Burnett, S., Mendel, P., Nunes, F., Wiig, S., Bovenkamp, H. V., Karltun, A., Robert, G., Anderson, J., Vincent, C., & Fulop, N.(2015). Using Institutional Theory to Analyze Hospital Responses to External Demands for Finance and Quality in Five European Countries. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 21, 109-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819615622655
Butler, T. (2003). An Institutional Perspective on Developing and Implementing Intranet- and Internet-Based Information Systems.Information Systems Journal, 13, 209-231. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2003.00151.x
Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 243-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00013-8
Cavusoglu, H., Cavusoglu, H., Son, J.-Y., & Benbasat, I. (2015). Institutional Pressures in Security Management: Direct and Indirect Influences on Organizational Investment in Information Security Control Resources. Information & Management, 52, 385-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.12.004
Chew, E., Swanson, M., Stine, K. M., Bartol, N., Brown, A., & Robinson, W. (2008). Performance Measurement Guide for Information Security. NIST Special Publication 800-55 Revision 1, 1-40. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-55r1
Cisco (7 June 2017). The Zettabyte Era: Trends and Analysis. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/
CITC (17 September 2017). Parental Control Service Regulatory Framework. https://www.citc.gov.sa/en/new/publicConsultation/Pages/143804.aspx
CITC (2011). Information Security Policies and Procedures Development Framework for Government Agencies. https://www.citc.gov.sa/en/RulesandSystems/RegulatoryDocuments/OtherRegulatoryDocuments /Documents/CITC_Information_Security_Policies_and_Procedures_Guide_En.pdf
Clement, J. (22 July 2019). Cyber-Crime: Most-Targeted Victim Countries 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/256653/most-targeted-victim-countries-of-cyber-attacks/
Council of Europe (2020). Parties/Observers to the Budapest Convention and Observer Organisations to the T-CY. https://www.coe.int/en/web/cybercrime/parties-observers
Currie, W. (2009). Contextualizing the IT Artefact: Towards a Wider Research Agenda for IS Using Institutional Theory. Information Technology & People, 22, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840910937508
Davidsson, P., Hunter, E., & Klofsten, M. (2006). Institutional Forces: The Invisible Hand that Shapes Venture Ideas? International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 24, 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242606061834
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Edwards, J. R., Mason, D. S., & Washington, M. (2009). Institutional Pressures, Government Funding and Provincial Sport Organizations. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 6, 128-149. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSMM.2009.028798
Electronic Transactions Law (2007). Communications and Information Technology Commission. https://www.citc.gov.sa/en/RulesandSystems/CITCSystem/Pages/ElectronicTransactionsLaw.aspx
Floyd, J. T. (8 March 2016). A Guide to Cyber Crime Laws. https://www.johntfloyd.com/
Forbes Middle East (28 March 2018). Arab Countries Facing the Highest Number of Cyber Attacks. https://www.forbesmiddleeast.com/en/
Gandhi, G. (May 2014). Complexity Theory in Cyber Security. http://cognitsolutions.blogspot.com/p/complexity-in-cyber-security.html
Ghosh, I. (7 November 2019). This Is the Crippling Cost of Cybercrime on Corporations. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/cost-cybercrime-cybersecurity/
Grabosky, P. (2014). The Evolution of Cybercrime, 2004-2014. SSRN Electronic Journal, RegNet Research Paper No. 2014/58. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2535605
Hallberg, J., Hallberg, N., & Hunstad, A. (2006). Crossroads and XMASS: Framework and Method for System IT Security Assessment. Linköping: Total Försvarets Forskningsinstitut (FOI).
Hovav, A., & D’Arcy, J. (2012). Applying an Extended Model of Deterrence Across Cultures: An Investigation of Information Systems Misuse in the US and South Korea. Information & Management, 49, 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2011.12.005
Hunton, P. (2011). A Rigorous Approach to Formalising the Technical Investigation Stages of Cybercrime and Criminality within a UK Law Enforcement Environment. Digital Investigation, 7, 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2011.01.002
Joode, A. D. (2011). Effective Corporate Security and Cybercrime. Network Security, 2011, 16-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-4858(11)70097-6
Kam, H.-J., & Katerattanakul, P. (2014). Information Security in Higher Education: A Neo-Institutional Perspective. Journal of Information Privacy and Security, 10, 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15536548.2014.912482
Kim, D.-J., Hwang, I.-H., & Kim, J.-S. (2016). A Study on Employees Compliance Behavior towards Information Security Policy: A Modified Triandis Model. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14, 209-220. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.4.209
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management. MIS Quarterly, 31, 59-87. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148781
Lund, M. S., Solhaug, B., & Stølen, K. (2011). Model-Driven Risk Analysis—The CORAS Approach. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12323-8
Mihindukulasuriya, R. (3 March 2020). India Was the Most Cyber-Attacked Country in the World for Three Months in 2019. https://theprint.in/tech/india-was-the-most-cyber-attacked-country-in-the-world-for-three-months-in-2019/374622/
Roser, M., Ritchie, H., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2020). Internet. https://ourworldindata.org/internet
Safa, N. S., Solms, R. V., & Furnell, S. (2016). Information Security Policy Compliance Model in Organizations. Computers & Security, 56, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2015.10.006
Selwyn, N. (2007). A Safe Haven for Misbehaving? Social Science Computer Review, 26, 446-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439307313515
Sherer, S. A. (2010). Information Systems and Healthcare XXXIII: An Institutional Theory Perspective on Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Records. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 26, 127-140. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02607
Shi, W., Shambare, N., & Wang, J. (2008). The Adoption of Internet Banking: An Institutional Theory Perspective. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 12, 272-286. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4760081
Singh, H. P. (2016). E-Commerce Security: Legal and Policy Aspects of Technology Solutions in India. Mumukshu Journal of Humanities, 8, 13-19.
Singh, H. P. (2017). Strategic Analysis and Security Issues of Social Media Services: A Study of Facebook. International Journal of Information Movement, 2, 134-139.
Singh, H. P. (2018a). Domain Name Disputes and Their Resolution under UDRP Route: A Review. Archives of Business Research, 6, 147-156. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.612.5786
Singh, H. P. (2018b). Data Protection and Privacy Legal-Policy Framework in India: A Comparative Study vis-à-vis China and Australia. Amity Journal of Computational Sciences, 2, 24-29.
Singh, H. P., & Agarwal, A. (2011). Espousal of E-Learning in Adult Education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Techniques and Artificial Intelligence (pp. 28-31). Pattaya, Thailand: ISEM-Planetary Scientific Research Centre. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311104278_Espousal_of_E-Learning_in_Adult_Education
Singh, H. P., & Grover, S. T. (2011). Marketing of E-Banking Services: A Critical Analysis on Lifecycle Demographics, Enabling and Disabling Factors. Zenith International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1, 20-38.
Smith, S., & Jamieson, R. (2006). Determining Key Factors in E-Government Information System Security. Information Systems Management, 23, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078.10580530/45925.23.2.20060301/92671.4
Steinbart, P. J., Raschke, R. L., Gal, G., & Dilla, W. N. (2012). The Relationship between Internal Audit and Information Security: An Exploratory Investigation. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13, 228-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2012.06.007
Telecom Act (2001). Communications and Information Technology Commission. https://www.citc.gov.sa/en/RulesandSystems/CITCSystem/Pages/TelecommunicationsAct.aspx
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting Intention to Adopt Inter-Organizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective. MIS Quarterly, 27, 19-49. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036518
Timmons, J., Chabinsky, S. R., & Pittman, F. P. (1 May 2019). Cybersecurity and the UK Legal Landscape. https://www.whitecase.com/publications/alert/cybersecurity-and-uk-legal-landscape
Ting, S., & Kin, L. C. (25 February 2019). Cybersecurity in Singapore. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=e8e0c6b8-d81a-4dfc-a8fe-36a1dd3baa54
Ugrin, J. C. (2009). The Effect of System Characteristics, Stage of Adoption, and Experience on Institutional Explanations for ERP Systems Choice. Accounting Horizons, 23, 365-389. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2009.23.4.365
Zhang, J., Dawes, S. S., & Sarkis, J. (2005). Exploring Stakeholders Expectations of the Benefits and Barriers of E-Government Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 18, 548-567. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410390510624007