Reversing History?: The Challenges of Using “MABO No. 2” as an Avatar for Resolving Indigenous Land Claims in Africa
- 1 Faculty of Laws and Political Science, University of Yaoundé II, Yaoundé, Cameroon
Abstract
The nexus between the indigenous African and the land on which they live cannot be gainsaid. So important is this relationship that land is a sine qua non for the survival of the indigenous African and indigenous African cultures. However, despite this undisputed link, the indigenous African as well as other colonized peoples, lost ownership of their lands due mainly to the adverse effects of subjugation. The direct upshot of this is that even where the former colonial masters and their successor states have become sympathetic to the indigenous populations and decide to retrocede some of their land, they often encounter obstacles both in law and in modern history that are not easy to avoid. This was also the case in some countries where indigenous peoples lost their lands to settlers who took over command and decided on their destiny, such as the indigenous peoples in Australia. It was in an attempt to put this issue to rest that the High Court of Australia in the locus classicus MABO No. 2 attempted to define the circumstances under which land can revert to the indigenous populations as a matter of human rights. This article examines some of the “hooks” that the apparently generous MABO No. 2 decision may present, where there is an attempt to transpose it mutatis mutandis as an avatar to resolve the problem of indigenous land rights in Africa. The paper attempts to answer the question as to what extent the decision of the High Court of Australia in MABO No. 2 can be used to resolve indigenous land claims in Africa. Through an analytical approach, the paper investigates the challenges inherent in attempting to use the decision as a South-South mutual inspiration due to the contextual, historical and evolutionary differences between the Australian and African situations. The paper finds out that the decision in MABO No. 2 carries in it the very germ of its inapplicability in the African context and makes suggestions on how to read the MABO decision in the context of the present-day dispensation of indigenous African land law.
- Anaya, J. S. (1996). Indigenous Peoples in International Law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Burnham, P. (2000). Whose Forest? Whose Myth? Conceptualisation of Community Forests in Cameroon. In A. Abramson, & D. Theodossopoulos (Eds.), Land, Law and Environment: Mythical Land, Legal Boundaries (p. 38). London: Pluto Press.
- Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. (2012). The Theory from the South: Or How Euro-America Is Evolving toward Africa. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2012.694169
- Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007).
- Dlamini, J. The Organic Native? Reframing the Land Question in South Africa. Unpublished Manuscript.
- Ehiedu Iweriebor, E. G. (2011). The Colonization of Africa. New York: Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture. http://exhibitions.nypl.org/africanaage/essay-colonization-of-africa.html
- Elias, T. O. (1970). The Nature of African Customary Law Cited in Report and Recommendations by the Panel of Experts on the Development of Policy Regarding Land Ownership by Foreigners in South Africa.
- Faundez, J. (2010). Access to Justice and Indigenous Communities in Latin America. In Y. Ghai, & J. Cottrell (Eds.), Marginalized Communities and Access to Justice. London: Routledge.
- Gibson, A. M. (1984). Philosophical, Legal, and Social Rationales for Appropriating the Tribal Estate, 1607 to 1980. American Indian Law Review, 12, 3-38. https://doi.org/10.2307/20068248
- Kennedy, D. (2006). Three Globalizations of Law and Legal Thought: 1850-2000. In D. M. Trubek, & A. Santos (Eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: A Critical Appraisal (pp. 19-73). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Mbembe, A. (2001). On the Post Colony. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
- McLuhan, T. C. (1971). Touch the Earth: A Self Portrait of Indian Existence; a Compilation of Indigenous Peoples Statements about the Land and Its Meaning.
- Povinelli, E. (2002). The Cunning of Recognition: Indigenous Alterities and the Making of Australian Culturalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822383673
- Stone, J. (1966). Social Dimensions of Law and Justice. London: Stevens.
- Sumner, W. G. (1906). Law and Social Change, Folkways. New York: Dover Publications.