A Critical Analysis of the Nature and Effectiveness of a Floating Charge as a Security in Nigerian Law
- 1 Faculty of Law, Delta State University, Oleh Campus, Oleh, Nigeria
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to examine the character and efficacy of a floating charge as a security in Nigerian law. It argues that the disadvantages of a floating charge are so much making it a vulnerable security. The charge holder runs the risk of the company dissipating the assets attached to the charge which arguably is the most serious risk the charge holder faces. Furthermore, a floating charge usually will be deferred to any subsequent fixed legal charge created by the company over its assets. Similarly, if the company’s debts are under a floating charge, a floating charge holder’s asset will be made subject to or put under a lien or any set off created by the company with respect to the charged assets before crystallization. It uses the blackletter approach, relying particularly on the relevant provisions of the Nigerian Companies and Allied Matters Act and cases.
- 1RC v Goldblatt (1972). Ch 458.
- Animashnun v Olojo (1990). 16 NWLR (Pt. 154) 111.
- Armagh Shoes Limited (1984). BCLC 405.
- Australian Auxiliary Steam Clip per Co. v. Mounsey (1958). 4 KB 733.
- Biggerstaff v Rowatt’s Wharf (1896). 2 Ch 93, CA.
- Blacks (1990). Law Dictionary (6th ed.). Saint Paul, MN: West Publishing Co.
- Bryan v Metropolitan Co (1858). 3 De G & J 123.
- Companies and Allied Matters Act, 2020.
- Cretanor Maritime Co Ltd v Irish Marine Management Ltd (1978). 1 WLR 966 CA.
- English & Scottish Mercantile Investment Co Ltd v Brunton (1892). 2 QB 700 CA.
- Evans v Rival Quarries Ltd (1910). 2 KB 979.
- Goode, R. (2008). Goode on Legal Problems of Credit and Security (4th ed.). London: Sweet and Maxwell.
- Goode, R. M. (1988). Legal Problems of Credit and Security (2nd ed.). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
- Gower, L. C. B. (1979). Principles of Modern Company Law (4th ed.). London: Sweet and Maxwell.
- Hammer v London City and Midland Bank (1918). 87 LJ.K.8. 973.
- Holroyd v Marshal (1862). LR 10 I-TLC 191.
- Illingsworth v Houldsworth (1904). AC 355.
- Inter-Contractors Nigeria Ltd v. National Provident Fund Management Board (1988). 2 NWLR (Pt.76) 280.
- Kerr, W. W. (1989). Receivers and Administrators (17th ed., pp. 214-216). London: Sweet & Maxwell.
- Knightsbridge Estates Trust Ltd v Byrne (1940). AC 613.
- Lingard, J. R. (1993). Bank Security Documents (3rd ed.). London: Butterworths.
- McCormack, G. (2009). Registration of Company Charges (3rd ed.). Jordan Publishing.
- McMahon v North Kent Ironworks Co (1891). 2 Ch 148.
- Midland Bank Trust Co v Green (1981). All ER 153 at 158-159.
- Norton v Yates (1906). 1 KB 112 CA.
- Ogundiani v Araba (1978). 11 NSCC 334.
- Orojo, O. (1992). Company Law & Practice in Nigeria (3rd ed.). Mbeyi & Associates (Nig) Ltd.