Casualization of Labour: Implications of the Triangular Employment Relationship in Nigeria
- 1 Faculty of Law, Niger Delta University, Wilberforce Island, Nigeria
Abstract
Casualization is a global phenomenon. It is a form of nonstandard work arrangements practized in both developed and developing countries with varying degrees of regulation. Employers see it as a means of cutting costs and achieving flexibility, while workers see it as a work arrangement that denies them the right to employment benefits and to unionize and bargain collectively. This paper examines the concept of casualization and the implications of the triangular employment relationship in Nigeria in the context of international labour standards. It also examines the rights of casual workers to employment benefits and trade union rights in Ghana and China. It argues that the triangular or disguised employment relationship, which is the commonest form of casual employment in the banking and oil and gas sectors in Nigeria, fall outside the purview of the Labour Act. Amongst other things, the paper finds that the triangular or disguised employment relationship does not yield itself to the rights and benefits provided for workers in the traditional employment relationship and that it has segmented the labour market into core, non-core and peripheral zones. The paper calls for a comprehensive review of the Labour Act in line with international labour standards. It recommends the Ghana model with the necessary changes to suit local circumstances.
- Abel v Trevi Foundation Nigeria Ltd (2014). DJNIC 288-289.
- African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap A9, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
- African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights 1981, Article 15.
- Animashaun, O. (2007). Casualization and Casual Employment in Nigeria: Beyond Contract. Labour Law Review, 1, 14-34.
- Atilola, B. (2014). Protecting the Rights of Casual Workers in Nigeria: Lessons from Ghana. Labour Law Review, 8, 1-11.
- Bodibe, O. (2006). The Extent and Effects of Casualization in Southern Africa: Analysis of Lesotho, Mozambique, South Africa, Swaziland, Zambia and Zimbabwe (p. 55). Johannesburg: National Labour and Economic Institute.
- Cheadle, H. (2006). Regulated Flexibility: Revisiting the LRA and Basic Conditions of Employment Act. Industrial Law Journal, 27, 663, 668.
- Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, as Amended, s 40.
- Danesi, R. A. (2017). Labour Standards and the Flexible Workforce: Casualization of Labour under the Nigerian Labour Laws. https://www.ilera-directory.org/15thworldcongress/files/papers/Track_4/Poster/CS1W_32_DANESI.pdf
- Danesi, R. A. (2021). Labour Standards and the Flexible Workforce: Casualization of Labour under Nigerian Labour Laws. http://www.ilera-directory.org
- Employees’ Compensation Act 2010, s. 73.
- Eyongndi, D. (2016). An Analysis of Casualization of Labour under Nigeria Law. Gravitas Review of Business and Property Law, 7, 102-116.
- Fair Labour Association (2016). Labour Dispatch Workers in China. Issue Brief, March. https://www.fairlabour.org
- Fapohunda, T. M. (2012). Employment Casualization and Degradation of Work in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3, 257.
- Fenwick, C., Kalula, E., & Landau, I. (2007). Labour Law: A South African Perspective (p. 19). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
- Fourie, E. S. (2008). Nonstandard Workers: The South African Context. International Law and Regulation by the European Union. Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 11, 109. https://doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v11i4.42242
- ILO (1993). Resolution Concerning International Classification of Status in Employment. The International Conference of Labour Statisticians, January 1993, Paragraph 14(e). http://www.stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=293