Research on the Development Direction of International Commercial Arbitration Network
- 1 Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, China
Abstract
With the advancement and popularization of computer technology, arbitration methods and they are also developing in the direction of low cost and high efficiency. Nowadays, alternative methods to traditional dispute settlement methods have gradually emerged on the Internet, and network arbitration has emerged with the trend of the times. Due to its convenience and efficiency, network arbitration has received extensive attention since its birth. However, due to a series of its own reasons, network arbitration has also been left out to a certain extent. In order to further explore and analyze the development prospects and influencing factors of network arbitration, this article elaborates and analyzes the development status of network arbitration. This article mainly adopts the literature research method and the comparative analysis method, that is, according to the content of the network arbitration to be studied, sufficient information can be obtained by consulting the relevant literature, so as to fully understand the background, history, current situation and prospects of the network arbitration. After collecting and analyzing theories, systematically analyze them based on the existing research results, and compare them with the previous related documents, summarize the areas that need improvement, and further improve the theory so that the theory is well-founded and the design is more reasonable, and finally expresses some of my thoughts on the future development of network arbitration.
- Akinbote, A. (2009). Arbitration in Africa—The State of Arbitration in Nigeria. Transnational Dispute Management.
- Alfred Topper Inc. (New York) v. Edokpolor (1965). 1 All NLR, 292.
- Arbitration Act (1996). s 7.
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act s.5. (1996).
- Berg, A. (1981). The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: An Overview. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 365, 112-137.
- Carob Industries Pty Ltd. (In Liquidation) v Simto Pty Ltd. (2000). 23 WAR 515.
- China Lawyers Association Website (2016). China’s First Internet Arbitration Court Was Unveiled in Beijing. http://www.acla.org.cn/article/page/detailById/11268?from=groupmessage
- Chuprunov, I. S. (2012). Chapter I: The Arbitration Agreement and Arbitrability: Effects of Contractual Assignment on an Arbitration Clause—Substantive and Private International Law Perspectives. In C. Klausegger, et al. (Eds.), Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration (pp. 25-37). Manz’sche Verlags-und Universitätsbuchhandlung.
- Cooke, E. (2000). The Modern Law of Estoppel. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198262220.001.0001
- Dallah Real Estate & Touris Holding Co v Pakistan (2010). UKSC 46 (SC).
- Dow Chemical France (1984). The Dow Chemical Company and Others v ISOVER Saint Gobain, Interim Award, ICC Case No. 4131, 23 September 1982. In P. Sanders (Ed.), Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 1984 Volume IX (pp. 131, 136-137). ICCA & Kluwer Law International.
- Gaillard, E., & Savage, J. (1999). Part 2: Chapter II—Formation of the Arbitration Agreement. In: Fouchard Gaillard Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration (pp. 57-103). Kluwer Law International.
- Hanotiau, B. (2006). Complex Arbitrations: Multiparty, Multicontract, Multi-Issue and Class Actions. Kluwer Law International.
- IBA Ethics for International Arbitrators (1987).
- IBA Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration (2004). Approved on 22 May 2004 by the Council of the International Bar Association.
- ICC Case No. 1776.
- Kamanga, P. (2021). The Power of the Arbitral Tribunal to Determine Its Own Jurisdiction in International Commercial Arbitration. Beijing Law Review, 12, 379-391. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2021.122021