Invoking the Supervisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Ghana. The Case of a Meddlesome Interloper (Busybody)
- 1 African Centre for SDGs Research and Policy, Accra, Ghana
- 2 African Centre for SDGs Research and Policy, Accra, Ghana
Abstract
The Ghanaian courts have allowed the efflorescence of legal doctrines as necessary nutrients for the enjoyment and development of rights and obligations under the law within the Ghanaian jurisdiction. One such procedural doctrine is LOCUS STANDI or capacity of a party to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Ghana. This allows the Supreme Court to exercise constitutional oversight responsibility over the actions of all other courts in Ghana. This power emanates from Article 132 of the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana. The aim of this research is to unravel the inconsistency with which the Supreme Court of Ghana deals with who has the capacity under Article 132 to access the Supervisory Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Ghana under Constitutional regime. This paper was developed through qualitative review of various literatures and relevant modern case law to the subject.
- 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana: Articles 132, 2 Clause 1, 140 and Chapter 5.
- Barrett, A. C. (2006). The Supervisory Power of the Supreme Court. Columbia Law Review, 106, 324.
- Brown v. Quashigah [2003-2004] SCGLR at 941. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/
- Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 437 (2000).
- Gyimah v. Abrokwah [2011] 1 SCGLR 406. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/
- Kumado, C. K. (1977). Constitutionalism, Civil Liberties and Development. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1df0c35b
- Odike, E., & Akujobi, A. (2018). Enforcement of Fundamental Rights in National Constitutions: Resolving the Conflict of Jurisdiction between the Federal High Court and State High Court in Nigeria. Beijing Law Review, 9, 53-66.
- Order 55 of Rule (1) a, b and c of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2004, C.I. 47.
- Republic v. Committee of Inquiry into Nungua Traditional Council Affairs; Exparte Odai IV [1996-97] SCGLR 401. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/
- Republic v. High Court Human Rights; Ex Parte Naa Otua Swyne; Interested Party Prince Kofi Amoabeng Civil Motion № J5/8/2015. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/
- Republic v. High Court, Accra; Ex Parte Appenteng [1991] IGLR 353CA. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/
- Republic v. High Court, Denu; Ex Parte: Agbesi Awusu Ii (No 1), (Nyonyo Agboada (Sri Iii) Interested Party) Holding 2, Page 867. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/
- Republic v. High Court, Ex-Parte Sosu [1996-97] 2 SCGLR 525. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/
- Republic v. High Court, Ho, Ex Parte Bediako Li & Anor (Odum & Ors Interested Parties Suit No. J5/45/2018. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/
- Republic v. High Court, Kumasi, Ex-parte Bank of Ghana and Others, (Sefa and Asiedu-Interested Parties) (No. 1) Republic v High Court, Kumasi, Ex-parte Bank of Ghana and Others (Gyamfi and Others Interested Parties No. 1) Consolidated. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/
- Republic v. High Court, Kumasi; Ex Parte Appiah and Others [1997-98] 1 GLR 503. https://www.ghalii.org https://www.judy.legal/