The Responsibility of the Notary Regarding the Fulfillment of the Elements of Article 41 of the Notary Office Law
- 1 Faculty of Law, Syiah Kuala University, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
- 2 Faculty of Law, Syiah Kuala University, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
- 3 Faculty of Law, Syiah Kuala University, Darussalam, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
Abstract
One of the authentic deeds is made by a notary, by the law on the position of a notary, namely law number UU No. 30 of 2004 concerning the position of a notary which was later amended by Law no. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to Law no. 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary (UUJN), hereinafter referred to as UUJN. The negligence of notaries is mostly their negligence, there are several cases regarding article 41 of the UUJN, both regarding article 38 regarding organs, for example, such as neglecting information regarding the position of acting in front of them which is not even contained, both a description of the signing and the place of signing. The purpose of this study is to find out and explain the position of the deed issued by a notary containing the elements of article 41 UUJN, to know and explain the responsibility of the notary to fulfill the elements of article 41 UUJN, and to find out and explain the role of the authorized institution in fulfilling the elements of article 41 UUJN. This study uses a juridical-normative approach, which examines secondary data by conducting a literature study. The research phase was carried out through library research and field research. Data collection techniques used are document studies and interviews to obtain primary data, which are used to support secondary data. The results obtained are that firstly, the position of a notary deed is very important in the law of proof in Indonesia. So the position of an authentic deed is a legal document and a perfect means of proof. Second, a notary’s responsibilities as a public official include the notary profession’s responsibilities relating to the deed, such as the Notary which is responsible for civil and criminal matters for the deed he made.
- Adjie, H. (2008). HukumNotariat di Indonesia-TafsiranTematik Terhadap UU No. 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Refika Aditama.
- Ali, A. (2002). Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis). Gunung Agung.
- Budiono, H. (2005). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 30 tahun 2004 (dilema Notaris di Antara Negara, Masyarakat dan pasar). Renvoi, No. 4. 28. III, 3 September.
- Christine, S. T. (2009). Kansil, and Kansil, Engelien R, Palandeng dan Godlieb N Mamahit, Kamus Istilah Hukum, Jakarta.
- Kelsen, H. (2006). Teori Hukum Murni. Terjemahan Raisul Mutaqie, Nuasa & Nusamedia, Bndung Selanjutnya ditulis Hans Kelsen III.
- Kelsen, H. (2007). General Theory of Law and State, Teori Umum Hukum dan Negara, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif Sebagai Ilmu Hukum Deskriptif Empirik, Terjemahan Somardi. BEE Media Indonesia, Jakarta (Selanjutnya ditulis Hans Kelsen II).
- Moegni Djojodirjo, M. A. (1982). Perbuatan melawan hokum. Pradnya Paramita.
- Nufiar, M., & Ali, M. (2020). Settlement of Problematic Loans in the Unit Pengelola Kegiatan (UPK) of Pidie District did Sharia. Journal of Social Science, 1, 147-151. https://doi.org/10.46799/jsss.v1i4.55
- Priyatno, D. (2004). Kebijakan Legislasi tentang Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi di Indonesia. CV. Utomo.
- Ridwan, H. R. (2016). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Rajawali Pers.
- Surat Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum pada Kejaksaan Negeri Lhokseumawe No. Reg. Perk.: PDM-04/LSM/Ep. 2/03/2013 tanggal 25 Maret 2013.
- Syahrani, R. (1999). Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
- Tedjosapatro, L. (1991). Mal Praktek Notaris dan Hukum Pidana. CV Agung.