The Doctrine of Occupation through “<i>Terra Nullius</i>” as a Right of Self-Determination of Peoples and the Legal Status of “Liberland” Territory under International Law — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Doctrine of Occupation through “<i>Terra Nullius</i>” as a Right of Self-Determination of Peoples and the Legal Status of “Liberland” Territory under International Law
Open University of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
1 Open University of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
There has been much written about the legality of peoples’ right to self-determination, particularly the external aspect that involves the secession of a state or the formation of a new state through the landmass division of an existing state. This article departs from discussing the right of peoples to self-determination through secession and instead investigates the doctrine of occupation through terra nullius as an aspect of the right of peoples to self-determination. This article contends that the relationship between peoples’ right to self-determination and terra nullius is untenable under current international law. As a result, the author of this article disputes the liberland territory’s claim as State under the claims of terra nullius , arguing that claims of terra nullius cannot be legally claimed by an individual person, despite the territory meeting some of the requirements set out in Article 1 of the Montevideo convention on how to recognize a State. To reach its conclusion, this study employed a qualitative research method.
African, U. (1981, June 27). African Charter on Human and Peoples Rights. African Union. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201520/volume-1520-I-26363-English.pdf
Anderson, M. S. (1958). The Great Powers and the Russian Annexation of the Crimea, 1783-4. The Slavonic and East European Review, 37, 17-41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4205010?seq=1
Anghie, A. (2004). Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law. Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge University Press.
Banner, S. (2005). Why Terra Nullius? Anthropology and Property Law in Early Australia. Law and History Review, 23, 95-131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0738248000000067 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238387290_Why_Terra_Nullius_Anthropology_and_Property_Law_in_Early_Australia
Barton, D. (n.d.). James II and the Glorious Revolution of 1688. The Church in History Information Centre (Britain 1649-1829). http://www.churchinhistory.org/pages/booklets/king-james.pdf
Brennan, T. (n.d.). The Louisiana Purchase: Real Estate Deal of the Century? Was President Thomas Jefferson Right to Purchase the Louisiana Territory (pp. 1-13). https://www.umbc.edu/che/tahlessons/pdf/historylabs/The_Louisiana_Purchase:_Real_Estate_Deal_of_the_Century.PrinterFriendly.pdf
Carlson, E. C. (2016). Living in Indigenous Sovereignty: Relational Accountability and the Stories of White Settler Anti-Colonial and Decolonial Activists. Thesis, The University of Manitoba. https://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/bitstream/handle/1993/32028/carlson_elizabeth.pdf
Chinkin, C. (2009). Laws of Occupation. http://removethewall.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Laws-of-Occupation-Christine-Chinkin-2009.pdf
Chinkin, C., & Baetens, F. (2015). Sovereignty. In C. Chinkin, & F. Baetens (Eds.), Sovereignty, Statehood and State Responsibility: Essays in Honour of James Crawford (pp. 1-152). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107360075
Cittadino, F. (2016). Indigenous Rights and the Protection of Biodiversity: A Study of Conflict and Reconciliation in International Law (p. 85). PhD Thesis, University of Trento-Italy. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/80820368.pdf
Cook, M. A. (2011). Manifest Opportunity: The Alaska Purchase as a Bridge between United States Expansion and Imperialism. Alaska History, 26, 1-10. http://alaskahistoricalsociety.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Article-on-purchase.pdf
Craven, M. (2015). Between Law and History: The Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 and the Logic of Free Trade. London Review of International Law, 3, 31-59. https://academic.oup.com/lril/article/3/1/31/2413101 https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lrv002
Depoorter, B. W. F., & Bouckaert, B. (2014). 1200 Adverse Possession—Title Systems. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251637684
Fitzmaurice, A. (2007). The Genealogy of Terra Nullius. Australian Historical Studies, 38, 1-15. http://caid.ca/GenTerNul2007.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/10314610708601228
Gathii, J. T. (2004). Foreign and Other Economic Rights upon Conquest and under Occupation: Iraq in Comparative and Historical Context. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 25, 491, Summer 2004. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1241&context=jil
Gilbert, J. (2004). “Indigenous Peoples” Land Rights under International Law: From Victims to Actors. Transnational Publishers Inc.
Hillier, T. (1998). Sourcebook on Public International Law. Cavendish Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843143802
Hu, H. (2016). The Doctrine of Occupation: An Analysis of Its Invalidity under the Framework of International Legal Positivism. Chinese Journal of International Law, 15, 75-138. https://academic.oup.com/chinesejil/article-abstract/15/1/75/1745026 https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmw008
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966).
Jennings, R. S. (2003). The Road Ahead Lessons in Nation Building from Japan, Germany, and Afghanistan for Postwar Iraq (pp. 13-19). Peaceworks No. 49. https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/pwks49.pdf
Knop, K. (2004). Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law. Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law, Cambridge University Press.
Koba, T. (2020). Francisco de Victoria’s Idea of Natural Law and Its Relationship with Division of Things. Journal of European Languages and Literatures, No. 11, 1-18.
Koebrich, S. (2017). Report from Practically Somewhere: Liberland, Sovereignty, and Norm Contestation. Master Thesis, Central European University, Department of International Relations, Budapest Hungary. https://www.academia.edu/34006894/Report_From_Practically_Somewhere_Liberland_Sovereignty_and_Norm_Contestation
Kornan, S. (1996). The Right of Conquest: The Acquisation of Territory by Force in International Law and Practice. Claredon Press.
Koskenniemi, M. (2004). The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870-1960. Cambridge University Press.
Lesaffer, R. (2005). Argument from Roman Law in Current International Law: Occupation and Acquisitive Prescription. The European Journal of International Law, 16, 25-58. http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/16/1/289.pdf https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi102
Levitt, J. I. (2015). African Origins of International Law: Myth or Reality? UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs, 19, 130-138. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/147012011.pdf
Mabo & Others v Queensland. 2 (High Court of Australia (HCA) 175 CLR 1 June 3, 1992). https://www.jade.io/article/67683
Marxsen, C. (2014). The Crimea Crisis: An International Law Perspective. Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht—ZaöRV, 74, 367-391. https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf4/Marxsen_2014_-_The_crimea_crisis_-_an_international_law_perspective.pdf
Miller, R. J. (2019). The Doctrine of Discovery: The International Law of Colonialism, UCLA, the Indigenous Peoples. Journal of Law, Culture & Resistance, 5, 35-42. https://escholarship.org/content/qt3cj6w4mj/qt3cj6w4mj.pdf?t=po79hi https://doi.org/10.5070/P651043048
Nations, U. (1966, December 16). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). 2200 A. UNGA Resolution.
Ogot, B. A. (1992). General History of Africa V Africa from the Sixteenth to the Eighteenth Century. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
Pagden, A. (1991). Francesco de Victoria on the American Indians. Cambridge University Press (CUP).
Petreski, M. (2015). The International Public Law and the Use of Force by the States. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 1, 1. http://e-jlia.com/papers/v2_9.pdf
Registered Trustees of the Holy Spirit Sisters Tanzania vs. January Kamili Shayo, Civil Appeal No. 193 of 2016 (Tanzania Court of Appeal August 6, 2018).
Reisman, W. M., & Silk, J. (1988). Which Law Applies to the Afghan Conflict? The American Journal of International Law, 82, 459-486. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1745&context=fss_papers https://doi.org/10.2307/2202961
Ritter, D. (1996). The “Rejection of Terra Nullius” in Mabo: A Critical Analysis. Sydney Law Review, 18, 1-29. https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=970100936;res=IELAPA
Rudnick, J. (2017). The Doctrine of Occupation and the Founding of Australia. Fundamina, 23, 81-93. http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/funda/v23n2/05.pdf https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-7870/2017/v23n2a5
Schwed, A. (1982). Territorial Claims as a Limitation to the Right of Self-Determination in the Context of the Falkland Is-lands Dispute. Fordham International Law Journal, 6, 443-471. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1073&context=ilj
Stephen, R. F. (1968). Res Nullius and Occupation in Roman and International Law. University of Missouri (Kansas City) Law Review, 36, 274-287.
Sterio, M. (2013). The Right to Self-Determination under International Law “Selfistans”, Secession, and the Rule of Great Powers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203083963
United Nations (1945). Charter of the United Nations and Statue of the International Court of Justice. Articles 1(2), 55 and 73, (U. Nations, Compiler) Article 73. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf
Western Sahara Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports, 1975 (Intenational Court of Justice 1975).
Whitmore, C. C. (1896). The Doctrine of the Acquisition of Territory by Occupation in International Law. Historical Theses and Dissertations Collection, Historical Cornell Law School, Paper 365. https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1335&context=historical_theses
Wilson njoroge kamau v nganga muceru kamau, elc no. 259 of 2017(OS) (Environment and Land Court January 27, 2020). http://kenyalaw.org/caselaw/cases/view/188668