Definition of “Armed Conflict” in Outer Space
- 1 Department of International Law, China Foreign Affairs University, Beijing, China
Abstract
Countries should follow the principle of peaceful development when developing and utilizing outer space resources and rights, but the increasing militarization or weaponization of space is contrary to this basic principle. The militarization or weaponization of space not only creates tension in international relations but also greatly increases the danger of armed conflicts in space. According to the basic theory of international humanitarian law, it can be deduced that once an armed conflict in outer space breaks out, the existing international humanitarian law can be applied. Then, determining the definition of “armed conflict in outer space” and the possible types of “armed conflict in outer space” are the prerequisites for the application of international humanitarian law. Although no armed conflict in outer space has actually broken out yet, it does not prevent us from conducting tentative research on the concept of “armed conflict” in combination with the characteristics of outer space activities.
- Boothby, W. (2018). New Technologies and the Law in War and Peace. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108609388
- Freeland, S. (2011). In Heaven as on Earth the International Legal Regulation of the Military Use of Outer Space. US-China Law Review, 8, 272-287.
- Greenwood (2008). Scope of Application of Humanitarian Law. In D. Fleck (Ed.), The Handbook of International Humanitarian Law (2nd ed., p. 72). Oxford University Press.
- He, Q. Z., & Huang, H. K. (2000). Outer Space Law (p. 198). Qingdao Press.
- ICRC (2008-01). How Is the Term “Armed Conflict” Defined in International Humanitarian Law? https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/assets/files/other/opinion-paper-armed-conflict.pdf
- ICRC (2016). Commentary on the First Geneva Convention: Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- ICTY (2005). The Prosecutor v. FatmirLimaj et al., Trial Chamber II (Judgment), 30 November 2005, Case No. IT-03-66-T, para. 89.
- ICTY (2008-02). The Prosecutor v. RamushHaradinaj et al., Trial Chamber I (Judgment), Case No. IT-04-84-T, 3 April 2008, para. 60.
- Macak, K. (2018). Silent War: Applicability of the Jus in Bello to Military Space Operations (pp. 94, 1-[i]). International Law Studies Series, US Naval War College.
- Meltzer, N. (2019). An Introduction to International Humanitarian Law (pp. 51-71). ICRC East Asia Regional Delegation. https://www.icrc.org/zh/publication/4231-international-humanitarian-law-comprehensive-introduction
- Meyer, A. (1969). The Interpretation of the Term Peaceful in the Light of the Space Treaty. ZLW, 18, 30.
- Schmitt, M. N. (2017). Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316822524
- Yang, K. (2018). On the Application of International Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts in Outer Space. Renmin University of China Law Review, 1, 321-343.
- Zhao, Y. (2022). Analysis of Basic Legal Issues Involved in the Operation of China’s Space Station. Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law, 2, 26-36.