Questioning the Fundamental Right to the Material Equality: Do the Exceptional Cases Justify the Ultraliberal Meritocracy?
- 1 Faculdade de Direito de Vitória (FDV) and Faculdade Damas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- 2 Faculdade de Direito de Vitória (FDV), Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
The research that originated this article started from the premise according to which there are affirmative actions in the general society, that is, public measures applied in order to reduce the inequality affecting the so-called minorities, which regards the egalitarian ideology. Despite this presupposition and these generalized public measures, worldwide created, there is also a meritocratic discourse that diminishes the necessity of the affirmative actions, preaching that if there are certain persons that belonged to minority groups that could surpass their difficulties, does not remain any justification for the affirmative actions, because supposedly the respective same efforts could be taken by all minorities’ members. Better explaining, it was intended to comprehend if the speech of resilience taken by the most successful part of individuals belonged to minoritarian groups is able to crash the affirmative actions destined to mitigate the typical obstacles and the inequality faced by respective minorities. In other words, it was aimed to answer this question: “do the exceptional cases justify the meritocracy?”. Therefore, it was investigated the following points, conceived as fundamentals and as presuppositions to truly understand the described problematic: 1) the concepts of the egalitarian and the meritocratic ideologies; 2) the concept, the social function and the objective of the affirmative actions, including the analysis of some Brazilian examples, regarding specific law provisions; 3) the concept of minority, considering objectively defined criteria. Thus, in a nutshell, it was concluded that exceptional cases risen from minorities do not build an argument strong enough to shatter the affirmative actions, neither to sustain the ultraliberal meritocracy branch. Moreover, it consisted on a research that belongs to the exploratory and to the descriptive natures, also that used the inductive-observatory method, by a bibliographical technical procedure, done through a database collection.
- Alencastro, L. F. (2018). Africa, Numbers of the Atlantic Trafic. In M. Schwarcz, & F. Gomes (Eds.), Dicionário da Escravidão e Liberdade (pp. 57-63). Companhia das Letras, São Paulo.
- Angnes, J., Ichikawa, E., Klozovski, M., & Freitas, M. F. (2020). Has It Advanced? Backed Up? Considerations on Human Rights and Affirmative Actions for Indigenous Peoples in Latin America. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.4768
- Araújo, L., & Costa Filho, W. (2016). Law 13.146/2015 (The Statute of Persons with Disability or the Brazilian Law for Inclusion of Persons with Disability) and Its Effectiveness. Direito e Desenvolvimento, 7, 12-30.
- Bolesina, I., & Gervasoni, T. (2016). The Fundamental Right to Equality and the Principle of Solidarity as a Constitutional Basis for Affirmative Action. Brazilian Journal of Fundamental Rights and Guarantees, 2, 186-208.
- Brazil (1988, October 5). Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil of 1988. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm
- Brazil. Federal Law No. 12,711, August 29, 2012. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12711.htm
- Brazil. Federal Law No. 13.146/2015, July 6, 2015. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13146.htm
- Castro, V., & Tavares Júnior, F. (2016). Young People in Unfavorable Social Contexts and Academic Success in High School. Educação & Realidade, 41, 239-258. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-623656080
- Cunha, A. C. (2021). Disability as an Expression of the Social Issues. Serviço Social & Sociedade, 2, 303-321. https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-6628.251
- Danner, L. (2015). The New Brazilian Democratic Culture: Or beyond Conservative Modernization. Kalagatos, Fortress, 12, 167-227.
- Daza, J. (2020). Meritocracy, Freedom, Equal Opportunities and Competence. Dictamen Libre, 2, 157-173.
- França, A. P., Abdala, Veiga, K., Abreu, S., & Pereira, D. (2018). Privileges’ Network: Portuguese Bureaucracy and the Origins of the Brazilian Social Inequality. Revista Transformar, 12, 104-113.
- Iensue, G. (2021). Affirmative Actions as a Response to the Brazilian Racial Dilemma. Revista de Direito, 13, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.32361/2021130211210
- Jeveaux, G. (2018). Law and Ideology. GZ.