The objective of this study is to highlight the multiplicity of scenarios regarding issues of stability and underscore certain stability stipulations in the contemporaneous application, and certain developments, which gives a great cause for concern to parties to Petroleum International Agreements (PIAs) Amongst which are the recurrent problem of the impossibility of performance occasioned by supervening circumstances and disequilibria in relationships occasioned by events, which render the possibility of performance onerous. The study found that pacta sunt servanda cannot apply in absolute terms when ranged against the consideration of sovereignty of the state party over the natural resources in situ within its territorial sovereignty. It concluded that it is inconceivable to have immutable PIAs whose terms are frozen in time and or incorporate stabilization clauses that are contrived to freeze the HC’s laws; or remove the PIA from the purview of the municipal law of the HC.
KeywordsPetroleum International Agreements<i>Pacta Sunt Servanda</i>Impossibility of PerformanceSupervening CircumstancesStabilization ClausesPermanent Sovereignty over Natural ResourcesTransnational Investment
Agip Spa v Peoples Republic of Congo, ICSID Case No. ARB/77/1, Award of 30 Novedmber, 1979.
Algerian State Enterprise v African State Enterprise, ICC Case No. 3099 and 3100, Award of 30 May, 1979.
Amended Mittal Mineral Development Agreement, The Mineral Development Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Liberia and Mittal Steel Holdings N.V. Dated August 17, 2005, and the Amendment Thereto Dated December 28, 2006.
Amerasinghe, C. (1964). State Breaches of Contracts with Aliens and International Law. American Journal of International Law, 58, 881-913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2196034
Aminoil Case (The Government of the State of Kuwait v The American Independent Oil Company), I.L.M. 21 (1982), 976.
Anglo-Iranian Oil Co. Case (United Kingdom v Iran), Judgment of 22 July 1952, ICJ Reports 1952, 93.
Arts, K., & Tamo, A. (2016). The Right to Development in International Law: New Momentum Thirty Years down the Line? Netherlands International Law Review, 63, 221-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40802-016-0066-x
Asante, S. (1979a). Stability of Contractual Relations in the Transnational Investment Process. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 28, 401-423. https://doi.org/10.1093/iclqaj/28.3.401
Asante, S. (1979b). Restructuring Transnational Mineral Agreements. American Journal of International Law, 73, 335-371. https://doi.org/10.2307/2201140
Bernardini, P. (2008). Stabilization and Adaptation in Oil and Gas Agreements. Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 1, 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwn001
Cameron, P. (2021). International Energy Law: The Pursuit of Stability. Oxford University Press.
Desai, M. (2014). The Paradigm of International Social Development: Ideologies, Development Systems and Policy Approaches. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203743997
Desierto, D. (2022). Coming Full Circle on Human Rights in the Global Economy: International Economic Law Tools to Realize the Right to Development. Loyola University Chicago International Law Review, 18, 1.
Dias, D. (2010). Stability in International Contracts for Hydrocarbons Exploration and Some of the Associated General Principles of Law: From Myth to Reality. OGEL Journal, 4.
Fawcett, J. (1948). Legal Aspects of State and Trading. British Yearbook of International Law, 45, 50.
Ibhawoh, B. (2011). The Right to Development: The Politics and Polemics of Power and Resistance. Human Rights Quarterly, 33, 76-104. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2011.0001
Ikejiaku, B. (2020). International Law, Western States, Third World States, and the Principles of Right to Economic Self-Determination. The Groningen Journal of International Law, 7, 195-215. https://doi.org/10.21827/GroJIL.7.2.195-215
Iqbal, K. (2012). The Right to Development in International Law. Routledge.
Karimova, T. (2016). Human Rights and Development in International Law (pp. 31, 57). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315665283
Kurdistan Region (2007). Model Production-Sharing Agreement. http://www.macleoddixon.com/documents/Draft_Kurdrdistan_Region_Production_Sharing_Contract_June 2007.pdf
Lax, H. (2019). Political Risk in the International Oil and Gas Industry. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429302312
Leben, C. (2010). Hans Kelsen and the Advancement of International Law (pp. 165-188). Hart Publishing.
Lorenzini, S. (2019). Global Development: A Cold War History (pp. 9-21). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691180151.003.0002
Maniruzzaman, M. (2008). The Pursuit of Stability in International Energy Investment Contracts: A Critical Appraisal of the Emerging Trends. The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 2, 121-157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwn012
Mann, F. (1944). The Law Governing State Contracts. British Yearbook of International Law, 20, 60.
Ngang, C. et al. (2018). Perspectives on the Right to Development. Pretoria University Law Press.
Ngang, C., & Kamga, S. (2020). Insight into Policies and Practices on the Right to Development. Rowman & Littlefield.
Okafor, O., & Ngwaba, U. (2020). International Accountability in the Implementation of the Right to Development and the “Wonderful Artificiality” of Law: An African Perspective. The Transnational Human Rights Review, 7, 40-74.
Saphire International Petroleum Ltd v National Iranian Oil Company, Arbitral Award, I.L.R 35 (1963), 136.
Selwyn, B. (2020). Economic Growth and the Ideology of Development. In B. Dunn (Ed.), Critical Political Economy (pp. 35-46). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903072.00007
Smith, D., & Wells, L. (1976). Conflict Avoidance in Concession Agreements. Harvard Journal of International Law, 17, 51.
Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company, California Asiatic Oil Company v. Libya, I.L.R. (1977). 389.
U.S.S.R. v. Israel, I.L.R 27 (1958), 631.
Vandenbogaerde, A. (2013). The Right to Development in International Law: A Call for Its Dissolution. Netherland Quarterly of Human Rights, 31, 187-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934411303100204