Since the unification movement of International Private Law, some consensus has been reached on application of Non-State law. However, due to the difficulties that exist in conceptual characterization and value judgment, the problems of insufficient connection between legislative supply and judicial practice have not been effectively solved. There is a real interaction between State Law and Non-state Law and it is important to promote the diversified development of international law by breaking the uniqueness of the application of State enacted law in the judicial and quasi-judicial fields. In response to the need for the construction of “Community of Shared Future for Mankind” and “foreign-Related Rule of Law”, China could focus on the consideration of “convenience”, realize the construction of a Non-state law system from the dimensions of system positioning, value hierarchy, norm evolution and reality promotion, and gradually endow international commercial usages with the status of applicable law at the domestic dimension.
Anthony A. D. (2012). The Concept of Custom in International Law (p. 33). Shandong University Literature and Art Press.
Che, P. Z. (2020). Application of the International Treaties and Usages after the Enactment of the Civil Code of the PRC. China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence, No. 6, 1-15.
Chen, L. H., & Lu, J. Y. (2019). The Integration of International Commercial Practices in to Chinese Civil Code. Journal of Soochow University (Law Edition), No. 1, 107-116.
Chen, Z. W. (2015). The General Exception Clause in Contemporary Private International Law. Chinese Journal of Law, No. 5, 194-207.
Deng, Z. L. (2008). Globalization Process as the “Pluralistic Interaction between State Law and Non-State Law”: A Neutral Criticism on the Debates of “Globalization of Law”. Hebei Law Science, No. 3, 2-16.
Genevieve, S. (2014). The Hague Principles and the Choice of Non-State Rules of Law to Govern an International Commercial Contract. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 40, 1-30.
He, Z. P. (2021). State Standard: Dynamic Characteristics of Modern International Law. Contemporary Law Review, No. 5, 110-126.
Jiang, S. B. (2010). Judicial Determination of Customary International Law (p. 269). China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Joshua, K. (2015). The Structure of International Arbitration Law and the Exercise of Arbitral Authority. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, 8, 229-266.
Li, W. (2017a). Autonomy of the Will of the Parties and the Application of International Treaties. Tsinghua University Law Journal, No. 4, 177-187.
Li, W. (2017b). On the Application of International Civil and Commercial Treaties. The Jurist, No. 4, 107-115.
Lv, Y. F. (2006). On the System of Transnational Contract Law. Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, No. 1, 16-24.
Mei, A. (2016). A New Approach to the Selection of Applicable Law: A Study Based on the Humanistic Perspective. Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University, No. 1, 64-71.
Michal, K. (2015). Non-State Law in International Commercial Arbitration. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 35, 265-292.
Miranda, F. (2007). A Typology of Relationships between State and Non-State Justice Systems. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 56, 67-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2007.10756615
Nicolas, C.-S. (2017). The Possibilities and Legitimacy of Non-State Participation in the Formation of Customary Law. International Community Law Review, 19, 98-125. https://doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341349
Pedro, J. M.-F., & Rafael, D. O. (2009). Globalization and Developments in the Apportionment of Jurisdiction between Arbitrators and Courts Concerning International Commercial Arbitration. Journal of International Business and Law, 8, 63-90.
Pei, P. (1999). On the Theory and Practice of Determining the Applicable Law of Contract by the Principle of Autonomy of Will. Law Science, No. 8, 25-28.
Peter, M. (2017). Article 3 of the Hague Principles: The Final Breakthrough for the Choice of Non-State Law. Law in International Commercial Contracts. Uniform Law Review, 22, 369-394.
Petersmann, E.-U. (1997). The GATT /WTO Dispute Settlement System. Kluwer Law International.
Song, Y. (2020). Study on the Application of International Commercial Usages in the Belt and Road Commercial Arbitration. Studies in Law and Business, No. 2, 183-196.
Symeonides, S. C. (2006). Contracts Subject to Non-State Norms. American Journal of Comparative Law, 54, 209-232. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/54.suppl1.209
Wan, E. X., & Yu, X. H. (2018). The Application of International Treaties to Domestic Civil Relations without Foreign Factors. China Legal Science, No. 5, 5-20.
Wang, Z. H. (2018). Analysis of the law of the Countries along the “Belt and Road”. Journal of Yangzhou University (Humanities & Social Sciences), No. 2, 12-21.
Xu, J. K. (2006). Private International Law and International Trade Usage. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition), No. 4, 67-73.
Yan, H., & Huang, R. Y. (2018). Non-State Law Article in Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts. Journal of Henan Police College, No. 1, 127-136.
Yang, M. S. (2020a). An Analysis on Legal Models of CISG’ Preemptive Application: A Concurrent Discussion on Legislation and Judicial Practice of Application of International Commercial Treaties in China. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), No. 4, 97-103.
Yang, P. R. (2020b). Application of International Treaty of Intellectual Property Rights in Chinese Courts. Intellectual Property, No. 9, 78-83.
Zhang, C. L. (2019). Study on Choice of Law in Systematic Way: Between Rules and Methods. Tribune of Political Science and Law, No. 5, 81-94.
Zhang, P. (2022a). The Applicability and Application Modes of International Civil and Commercial Treaties in Chinese Courts. Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law, No. 1, 105-116.
Zhang, P. (2022b). The Application of Commercial Treaty Based on Agreement: The Dual Path of Freedom of Contract and Autonomy. Chinese Journal of Maritime Law, No. 4, 100-109.
Zuo, H. C. (2022). Strength Change, Legal Tradition and the Evolution of Trade Policies of the United States, European Union, India and China. Journal of Political Science and Law, No. 1, 64-74. (In Chinese)