Ronald Dworkin wrote nothing or very little about the fundamental political issues of crime and punishment. This article proposes a Dworkinian reading of such issues. It focuses on two aspects of Dworkin’s work: 1) his criticism of judicial discretion, and 2) his “law as integrity” theory (legislative and adjudicative principle). Integrity of Law in Western legal traditions is examined from a bifurcated approach: on the one hand, in civil law jurisdictions, with a strong culture of legal positivism, the legislative principle is prominent; on the other hand, in common law jurisdictions, statutory provisions are less relevant, and other sources of law prevail (e.g., case law). Building upon Dworkin’s writings, we examine statute-oriented, sentencing models from civil law jurisdictions, and the sentencing guidelines systems from the U.S. and England and Wales. Despite their differences, we set out to find some convergence between both models, aiming at promoting greater integrity at sentencing.
Ashworth, A. (2009). Techniques for Reducing Sentence Disparity. In A. Von Hirsch, A. Ashworth, & J. Roberts (Eds.), Principled Sentencing: Readings on Theory and Policy (pp. 241-257). Hart Publishing.
Ashworth, A. (2010). Coroners and Justice Act 2009: Sentencing Guidelines and the Sentencing Council. Criminal Law Review, 5, 389-401.
Ashworth, A. (2015). Sentencing and Criminal Justice (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415270
Ashworth, A., & Roberts, J. (2012). Sentencing: Theory, Principle, and Practice. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (5th ed., pp. 866-894). Oxford University Press.
Ashworth, A., & Roberts, J. (2013). The Origins and Nature of the Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales. In A. Ashworth, & J. V. Roberts (Eds.), Sentencing Guidelines: Exploring the English Model (pp. 1-14). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684571.001.0001
Campbell, M. E. (2002). Sentencing Reform in Canada: Who Cares about Corrections? In C. Tata, & N. Hutton (Eds.), Sentencing and Society (pp. 139-154). Ashgate.
Chiesa, L. E. (2007). Taking Victims Seriously: A Dworkinian Theory of Punishment. Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico, 76, 117-128.
Culver, K. (2001). Leaving the Hart-Dworkin Debate. The University of Toronto Law Journal, 51, 367-398. https://doi.org/10.2307/825911
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Duckworth.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press.
Fellows, J., & Chong, M. D. (2016). Extra-Curial Punishment in Criminal Law Sentencing: A Principles-Based Approach. Southern Cross University Law Review, 18, 1-22.
Frankel, M. E. (1972). Lawlessness in Sentencing. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 41, 1-54.
Frase, R. (2001). Sentencing in Germany and the United States: Comparing Äpfel with Apples. Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law.
Frase, R. (2005). Sentencing Guidelines in Minnesota, 1978-2003. Crime & Justice, 32, 131-219. https://doi.org/10.1086/655354
Frase, R. (2014). Prior-Conviction Sentencing Enhancements: Rationales and Limits Based on Retributive and Utilitarian Proportionality Principles and Social Equality Goals. In J. V. Roberts, & A. Von Hirsch (Eds.), Previous Convictions at Sentencing: Theoretical and Applied Perspectives (pp. 117-136). Hart Publishing.
Freiberg, A. (2001). Three Strikes and You’re Out—It’s Not Cricket: Colonization and Resistance in Australian Sentencing. In M. Tonry, & R. Frase (Eds.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries (pp. 29-61). Oxford University Press.
Garland, D. (2001). The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226190174.001.0001
Huigens, K. (2007). The Jurisprudence of Punishment. William & Mary Law Review, 48, 1793-1829.
Hutton, N. (2013). The Definitive Guideline on Assault Offences: The Performance of Justice. In A. Ashworth, & J. V. Roberts (Eds.), Sentencing Guidelines: Exploring the English Model (pp. 86-103). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684571.003.0006
Krasnostein, S., & Freiberg, A. (2013). Pursuing Consistency in an Individualistic Sentencing Framework: If You Know Where You’re Going, How Do You Know When You’ve Got There? Law and Contemporary Problems, 76, 265-288.
Leiter, B. (2003). Beyond the Hart/Dworkin Debate: The Methodology Problem in Jurisprudence. American Journal of Jurisprudence, 48, 17-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/48.1.17
Mannozzi, G. (2002). Are Guided Sentencing and Sentence Bargaining Incompatible? Perspectives of Reform in the Italian Legal System. In C. Tata, & N. Hutton (Eds.), Sentencing and Society (pp. 110-132). Ashgate.
Nestler, C. (2003). Sentencing in Germany. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 7, 109-138. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2003.7.1.109
Padfield, N. (2013). Exploring the Success of Sentencing Guidelines. In A. Ashworth, & J. V. Roberts (Eds.), Sentencing Guidelines: Exploring the English Model (pp. 31-51). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684571.003.0003
Patterson, D. (2019). Dworkin’s Criticisms of Hart’s Positivism. In P. Mindus, & T. Spaak (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism (Cambridge Companions to Law) (pp. 675-694). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3345159
Pina-Sánchez, J., & Linacre, R. (2016). Refining the Measurement of Consistency in Sentencing: A Methodological Review. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 44, 68-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2015.06.001
Raz, J. (1986). Dworkin: A New Link in the Chain. California Law Review, 74, 1103-1119. https://doi.org/10.2307/3480404
Reitz, K. (2013). Comparing Sentencing Guidelines: Do US Systems Have Anything Worthwhile to Offer England and Wales? In A. Ashworth, & J. V. Roberts (Eds.). Sentencing Guidelines: Exploring the English Model (pp. 182-201). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684571.003.0012
Roberts, J., & Pina-Sánchez, J. (2014). Previous Convictions at Sentencing: Exploring Empirical Trend in the Crown Court. Criminal Law Review, 8, 575-588.
Rodrigues, A. M. (2014). A determinação da medida da pena privativa de liberdade: Os critérios da culpa e da prevenção. Coimbra Editora.
Scott, R. W. (2010). Inter-Judge Sentencing Disparity after Booker: A First Look. Stanford Law Review, 63, 1-66. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1446744
Sentencing Council (2011). Burglary Offences: Definitive Guideline. https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Burglary-definitive-guideline-Web.pdf
Shapiro, S. (2007). The “Hart-Dworkin” Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed (pp. 1-54). Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series No. 77.
Simons, K. W. (2010). Dworkin’s Two Principles of Dignity: An Unsatisfactory Nonconsequentialist Account of Interpersonal Moral Duties. Boston University Law Review, 90, 101-121.
Streck, L. L. (2013). Porque a discricionariedade é um grande problema para Dworkin e não o é para Alexy. Revista Direito e Práxis, 4, 343-367. https://doi.org/10.12957/dep.2013.8350
Streng, F. (2007). Sentencing in Germany: Basic Questions and New Developments. German Law Journal, 8, 153-171. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200005484
Tata, C. (2010). Sentencing and Penal Decision-Making: Is Scotland Losing Its Distinctive Character? In H. Croall, G. Mooney, & M. Munro (Eds.), Criminal Justice in Scotland (pp. 195-215). Willan Publishing.
Tata, C., & Hutton, N. (1998). What “Rules” in Sentencing? Consistency and Disparity in the Absence of “Rules”. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 26, 339-364. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijsl.1998.0070
Teske, R., & Albrecht, H. (1992). Prosecution and Sentencing Patterns in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Criminal Justice Review, 2, 76-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/105756779200200105
Tonry, M. (1996). Sentencing Matters. Oxford University Press.
Tonry, M. (2016). Sentencing Fragments: Penal Reform in America, 1975-2025. Oxford University Press.
Ulmer, J., Light, M., & Kramer, J. (2011). The “Liberation” of Federal Judges’ Discretion in the Wake of the Booker/Fanfan Decision: Is There Increased Disparity and Divergence between Courts? Justice Quarterly, 28, 799-837. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.553726
United States Sentencing Commission (2021). Guidelines Manual. https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines-manual/2021/GLMFull.pdf
Valles Santillán, G. (2022). Ronald Dworkin’s Legal Non-Positivism: Main Characteristics and Its Confrontation with Legal Positivism of the Twentieth Century (H.L.A. Hart). Mexican Law Review, 14, 107-117.
Wacks, R. (2014). Philosophy of Law: A Very Short Introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198725947.001.0001
Waldron, J. (2019). The Rise and Decline of Integrity (pp. 1-17). NYU School of Law, Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Working Paper n. 19-49. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3463479
Wasik, M. (2008). Sentencing Guidelines in England and Wales—State of the Art? Criminal Law Review, 4, 253-263.
Weigend, T. (2001). Sentencing and Punishment in Germany. In M. Tonry, & R. Frase (Eds.), Sentencing and Sanctions in Western Countries (pp. 188-221). Oxford University Press.