Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Philosophical Theory Changes and Civil Code Codification in Historical Perspective
Law School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China
- 1 Law School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Philosophical ideas are the basis for guiding people’s life and work. From a historical perspective, the codification of civil law is not only the advancement of legislative technology and legislative method, but also of legislative thought under the influence of the mainstream of contemporary philosophical ideas. From the philosophy of God to the philosophy of things and then to Marx’s humanistic thought, the codification of civil law has also undergone a transformation from maintaining the rule of rulers to maintaining the economic order of private ownership to reflecting the concern for human nature.
KeywordsPhilosophy TheoryImpactCompilation of Civil Code
- Chen, T. T. (2013). “Wonders of Modern and Ancient Times”: The Earliest Model and Enlightenment of Chinese Literature Going to the World. Journal of Anhui University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 37, 44-51.
- Du, F. (2018). On the Protection of Human Rights in the Compilation of China’s Civil Code. Southwest University of Political Science and Law.
- Guo, X. Y. (2020). On the Political Form and Dynamics of the “England Regime” under Montesquieu’s Writings. History of Political Thought, 11, 126-153 & 200.
- Han, X. P., & Li, W. J. (2020). Interpretation of Ethical Economic Thoughts in “1844 Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts”. Shandong Social Sciences, No. 3, 111-116.
- Hu, Y. Z., & Chen, S. F. (2008). Interpretation of the Thought of Division of Labor in “German Ideology”. Inheritance, No. 10, 40-41.
- Jiang, F. X. (2016). Analysis and Solution of the Theoretical Dilemma of Propertization of Personality Right and Personalization of Property Right. Jurists, No. 2, 15-26.
- Li, Z. Y. (2006). The Growth of Roman Law in the Middle Ages. Global Law Review, No. 1, 80-92.
- Liu, J. W. (2004). On the Compilation Thought and System of the Civil Code. Law Journal, No. 2, 17-19.
- Liu, Y. L., Liu, Y. L., & Wang G. X. (2008). On the Evolution of Marx’s Philosophical Ontology. Journal of Hebei Engineering University (Social Science Edition), No. 1, 39-41.
- Marx & Engels (1995). The Complete Works of Marx and Engels (Vol. 1, p. 68). People’s Publishing House.
- Marx & Engels (2002). The Complete Works of Marx and Engels (Vol. 3, pp. 58, 268). People’s Publishing House.
- Mo, W. M. (2021). The Synergetic Relationship between Reason and Faith in Montesquieu’s Enlightenment Thought. Journal of Fudan University (Social Science Edition), 63, 58-68.
- Tang, M. G. (2009). New Progress and Development Trend of Domestic Research on Medieval Philosophy since the Reform and Opening-Up. Theory Monthly, No. 7, 38-41.
- Wang, J. M., & Wang, A. G. (2008). The Green Vision of Red Classics—Social Justice and Ecological Justice in the Communist Manifesto. Journal of Suzhou University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), No. 5, 5-9.
- Xia, D. J., Wang, J., & Liu, B. G. (2001). On Truth Containing False—Also on the Interpenetration of Truth and False. Journal of Xuzhou Institute of Education, No. 4, 29-32.