Accountability beyond Institutional Rules: How the Corporative Interests Affect the National Councils of Justice and of the Public Prosecutor’s Service in Brazil — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Accountability beyond Institutional Rules: How the Corporative Interests Affect the National Councils of Justice and of the Public Prosecutor’s Service in Brazil
FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
,
FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
1 FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
2 FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
3 FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
4 FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
5 FGV, School of Administration, Department of Public Management, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
The article analyzes the design, composition, and normative activity of the National Council of Justice (CNJ) and of the National Council of the Public Prosecutor’s Service (CNMP) in Brazil, as explanatory elements of the type of control they exercise over their members. We conducted an inquiry into council member appointment criteria member profiles, and into how these aspects affect the Councils’ decisions. For that, we conducted a collective biography of the 203 members of these judicial Councils over the 2005-2019 period and an analysis of the content of the resolutions issued over that same period. We identified the formal rules and informal practices that guide the composition and functioning of these Councils and contend that the combination of these elements leads to a process in which corporatist accountability prevails over democratic accountability. The Brazilian Councils are, therefore, the expression of a symbiosis between accountability institutions and those accountable.
KeywordsDemocratic TheoryCorporative ControlIndependenceJudiciaryProsecution Service
Abrucio, F. et al. (2020). Combating COVID-19 under Bolsonaro’s Federalism: A Case of Intergovernmental Incoordination. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 54, 663-677. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220200354x
Albuquerque, M., & Belieiro, J. (2019). Economia, política e democracia: As sabatinas no Senado Federal dos indicados ao Banco Central nos governos FHC e Lula. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 30, 7-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-335220193001
Almeida, F. (2014). As elites da Justiça: Instituições, profiss õ es e poder na política da justiça brasileira. Revista de Sociologia e Politica, 22, 77-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987314225206
Arantes, R., & Moreira, T. (2019). Democracia, instituiíes de controle e justiça sob a ótica do pluralismo estatal. Opinião Publica, 25, 97-135. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-0191201925197
Avritzer, L. (2017). The Rousseff Impeachment and the Crisis of Democracy in Brazil. Critical Policy Studies, 11, 352-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1363066
Beckert, J. (2010). Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change. Sociological Theory, 28, 150-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01369.x
Bonelli, M. da G. (2010). Os magistrados, a autonomia profissional e a resistência à reforma do Judiciário no Brasil. In XXIX International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association. LASA.
Brasil (2004). Constitutional Amendment nr. 45 of 2004. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/emendas/emc/emc45.htm
Christensen, T. et al. (2012). Imitating the West? Evidence on Administrative Reform from the Upper Echelons of Chinese Provincial Government. Public Administration Review, 72, 798-806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02582.x
Coroado, S. (2020). Does Formal Independence of Regulators Change? Evidence from Portuguese Agencies. Governance, 33, 61-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12413
De Sa e Silva, F. (2020). From Car Wash to Bolsonaro: Law and Lawyers in Brazil’s Illiberal Turn (2014-2018). Law and Society, 47, S90-S110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12250
DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Engelmann, F. (2020). The “Fight against Corruption” in Brazil from the 2000s: A Political Crusade through Judicial Activism. Journal of Law and Society, 47, S74-S89. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12249
Ferejohn, J. (1999). Independent Judges, Dependent Judiciary: Explaining Judicial Independence. Southern California Law Review, 72, 353-384.
Fragale Filho, R. (2013). Conselho Nacional de Justiça: Desenho Institucional, Construçao de Agenda e Processo Decisorio. Dados—Revista de Ciências Sociais, 56, 975-1007. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0011-52582013000400008
Gallhofer, S., Haslam, J., & Walt, S. (2011). Accountability and Transparency in Relation to Human Rights: A Critical Perspective Reflecting upon Accounting, Corporate Responsibility and Ways forward in the Context of Globalization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22, 765-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.07.002
Garoupa, N. (2016). O Governo da Justica. Lisboa, Fundaçao Francisco Manuel dos Santos.
Garoupa, N., & Ginsburg, T. (2008). Guarding the Guardians: Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence. American Journal of Comparative Law, 57, 103-134. https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0004
Garoupa, N., & Magalhães, P. C. (2020). Public Trust in the European Legal Systems: Independence, Accountability and Awareness. West European Politics, 44, 690-713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1715605
George, B. et al. (2018). Institutional Isomorphism, Negativity Bias and Performance Information Use by Politicians: A Survey Experiment. Public Administration, 98, 14-28.
Gong, T., & Xiao, H. (2016). The Formation and Impact of Isomorphic Pressures: Extravagant Position-Related Consumption in China. Governance, 30, 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12242
Gruber, J. (1986). Controlling Bureaucracies: Dilemmas in Democratic Governance. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520330351
Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936-957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
Hammergren, L. (2002). Do Judicial Councils Further Judicial Reform? Lesson from Latin America. Rule of Law Series Democracy and Rule of Law Project No. 28, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Kerche, F., Oliveira, V., & Couto, C. (2020). The Brazilian Councils of Justice and Public Prosecutor’s Office as Instruments of Accountability. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 54, 1334-1360. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612201900212x
Larsson, O., & Naurin, D. (2016). Judicial Independence and Political Uncertainty: How the Risk of Override Affects the Court of Justice of the EU. International Organization, 70, 377-408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000047
Magalhães, P. C. (1999). The Politics of Judicial Reform in Eastern Europe. Comparative Politics, 32, 43-62. https://doi.org/10.2307/422432
Mainwaring, S., & Welma, C. (2003). Democratic Accountability in Latin America. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199256373.001.0001
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
Mongelós, S. A. A. (2013). O recrutamento de advogados pelo quinto constitucional para o Tribunal de Justiça do Paraná: Um estudo dos processos seletivos de 2010 e 2012. Master’s Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba.
Nunes, R. M. (2010). Politics without Insurance: Democratic Competition and Judicial Reform in Brazil. Comparative Politics, 42, 313-331. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041510X12911363509756
Olsen, J. P. (2015). Democratic Order, Autonomy, and Accountability. Governance, 28, 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12158
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. Sage Publications.
Pelizzo, R., & Stapenhurst, F. (2014). Government Accountability and Legislative Oversight. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315850610
Perry, J. L., Engbers, T. A., & Jun, S. Y. (2009). Back to the Future? Performance-Related Pay, Empirical Research, and the Perils of Persistence. Public Administration Review, 69, 39-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01939_2.x
Philp, M. (2009). Delimiting Democratic Accountability. Political Studies, 57, 28-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00720.x
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400841080
Ratinaud, P. (2014). Visualisation Chronologique des analyses ALCESTE: Application a Twitter avec l’exemple du hashtag# mariagepourtous. In Actes des 12es journées internationales d’analyse statistique des données textuelles (pp. 553-565). JADT.
Ribeiro, L. M., & Arguelhes, D. W. (2015). O Conselho no Tribunal: Mudança institucional e a judicialização de decisões do CNJ junto ao Supremo Tribunal Federal. Revista Direito e Práxis, 6, 464-503. https://doi.org/10.12957/dep.2015.14928
Ribeiro, L. M., & Paula, C. J. (2016). Inovação institucional e resistência corporativa: O processo de institucionalização e legitimação do Conselho Nacional de Justiça. Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas, 6, 5-19. https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp/bjpp.v6i3.4318
Ruzza, M. et al. (2020). Food Risks on the Web: Analysis of the 2017 Fipronil Alert in the Italian Online Information Sources. Risk Analysis, 40, 2071-2092. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13533
Setzler, M. (2020). Did Brazilians Vote for Jair Bolsonaro Because They Share His Most Controversial Views? Brazilian Political Science Review, 15, e0002. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202100010006
Shapiro, M. (1981). Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226161341.001.0001
Solomon, P. H. (2018). Transparency in the Work of Judicial Councils: The Experience of (East) European Countries. Review of Central and East European Law, 43, 43-62. https://doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04301003
Stone, L. (1971). Prosopography. Historical Studies Today, 100, 46-79.
Tomio, F., & Robl Filho, I. (2013). Accountability e independencia judiciais: Uma analise da competencia do Conselho Nacional de Justiça (CNJ). Revista de Sociologia e Politica, 21, 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-44782013000100004
Viegas, R. R. (2022). A face oculta do poder no Ministério Público Federal e o poder de agenda de suas lideranças. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 39, e26000. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2022.39.260005
Viegas, R. R. et al. (2022a). The Communication of Courts of Accounts and Prosecution Services on Social Media: The Challenges of Accountability in the Digital Democracy. Brazilian Journal of Public Administration, 56, 324-348. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220210320
Viegas, R. R., Abrucio, L. F., & Mongelós, S. A. A. (2022b). Quem controla os controladores no sistema de justiça do Brasil? A composiêo de CNJ e CNMP entre 2005 e 2019. In The 13th Meeting of the Brazilian Association of Political Science (ABCP). https://cienciapolitica.org.br/web/pt-br/eventos/13deg-encontro-abcp
Viegas, R. R., Loureiro, M. R., & Abrucio, F. L. (2022c). Do controle externo à simbiose com o sistema de justiça: A ação normativa do CNJ e do CNMP. Revista Brasileira De Ciências Sociais, 37, e3711005. https://doi.org/10.1590/3711005/2022
Zald, M., & Lounsbury, M. (2010). The Wizards of Oz: Towards an Institutional Approach to Elites, Expertise and Command Posts. Organization Studies, 31, 963-996. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610373201