New Ways to Address Competition Challenges in Digital Markets: Reflections and Enlightenment of the EU’s Proposal for a New Competition Tool
- 1 Law School, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China
Abstract
The proposal for the new Competition tool is the EU’s positive response to the structural competition challenges of the digital economy. It is an extremely flexible non-sanction competition instrument designed to empower the Commission to intervene in the market by developing binding remedies when there is no violation of competition law. This tool, referring to the UK market study tool, makes a pioneering exploration on the basis of traditional competition law enforcement tools and industry regulation tools. Although it helps to cope with the structural competition challenges in the digital era, it also faces severe legal challenges. The proposal of the new Competition tool does not appear suddenly, but is the result of the trade-off between the modernization of EU competition law and the introduction of economic analysis to highlight the dilemma of enforcement costs, and the abuse of commitment system leading to the stagnation of the development of the theory of competition damage, and the mutual promotion of the two systems evolution processes. The proposal of the new competition tool is an attempt to change the concept path, which is bound to face many doubts and challenges, but it also brings enlightenment for China’s competition governance in the digital era. In terms of method, competition status assessment is a beneficial supplement to anti-monopoly law enforcement. It is also necessary to reasonably grasp the status and function of economics in antitrust practice.
- Ahlborn, C., & Leslie, W. (2021). “Jack of All Trades, Master of None”: The Ever-Increasing Ambit of the Market Investigation Regime. In B. Rodger, P. Whelan, & A. MacCulloch (Eds.), The UK Competition Regime. A Twenty-Year Retrospective (pp. 137-162). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198868026.003.0006
- Ahlborn, C., & Piccinin, D. (2010). Between Scylla and Charybdis: Market Investigation and the Consumer Interest. In B. Rodger (Ed.), Ten Years of UK Competition Law (DUP) (p. 178). Dundee University Press.
- Antitrust Bureau of the State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration (2020). Annual Report on China’s Antitrust Enforcement (p. 100). Law Press.
- Choné, P., Souam, S., & Vialfont, A. (2012). Commitments in Antitrust (p. 3). https://economix.fr/en/documents-de-travail/commitments-in-antitrust
- Claus-Dieter, E. (1996). Implementation of EC Competition Law by National Anti-Trust Authorities. European Competition Law Review, 17, 88-89.
- Competition Commission, BAA Airports Market Investigation—A Report on the Supply of Airport Services by BAA in the UK, 19 March 2009, Case Currently Challenged before the CAT.
- Competition Commission, CC3 (Revised), Guidelines for Market Investigations: Their Role, Procedures, Assessment and Remedies [2013] Paras 18-19.
- Delmas-Marty, M., & Teitgen-Colly, C. (1992). Punir sans juger? De la répression administrative au droitadministratifpénal (Economica).
- European Court on Human Rights (2020). Guide on Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights: Right to a Fair Trial (Criminal Limb) (pp. 9-10).
- Fletcher, A. (2020). Market Investigation for Digital Platforms: Panacea or Complement (p. 4). CCP Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668289
- Gerard, D. (2016). Negotiated Remedies in the Modernization Era: The Limits of Effectiveness. In P. Lowe, & M. Marquis (Eds.), European Competition Annual 2013: Effectiveness and Legitimate Enforcement (pp. 139-184). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781782257813.ch-005
- Gerber, D. J. (2007). Two Forms of Modernization in European Competition Law. Fordham International Law Journal, 31, 1243-1245.
- Hildebrand, D. (2002). The Role of Economic Analysis in the EC Competition Rules. Kluwer Law International, 66, 195-197.
- Hovenkamp, H. (2009). Federal Antitrust Policy: Competition Law and Its Practice (Translated by Xu Guangyao, Jiang Shan and Wang Chen, p. 79). Law Press.