Global Governance and Democracy: Discussing Mutual Legal Correspondence, Human Rights, and Legal Cooperation on Criminal Justice
- 1 Law Department (PPGDIR and PPGAERO), Social Sciences Center, Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil
- 2 Law Department, Faculdade de Direito de Vitória (FDV), Vitória, Brazil
- 3 Law Department, Faculdade Santa Terezinha Cest (CEST), São Luís, Brazil
- 4 Federal University of Maranhão(UFMA), São Luís, Brazil
- 5 Faculdade de Direito de Vitória (FDV), Vitória, Brazil
Abstract
As a global social system, law can be considered a tool for constructing a common multilateral interest identity. It plays a crucial role in creating a common multilateral interest identity amongst free and equal individuals, and it should be established and shared under mutual recognition to promote interaction between legal and geopolitical/social realities. However, a shared understanding of the Rule of Law’s justifications and normative-making approach is necessary to protect fundamental rights. The principles of self-determination and mutual legal correspondence should function as a bridge between individuals, encouraging cooperation and solidarity among different countries. Nonetheless, that founding idea requires an updated individual-state self-determination principle, promoting an open inter-nations procedural democracy. However, protecting fundamental rights requires objective coherence and substantial agreement on normative-making approaches. This essay focuses on the interconnections between the Doha Declaration, mutual legal correspondence, and sustainable development goals, addressing global governance, democracy, and human rights protection. It also discusses criminal legal cooperation and policies under the Rule of Law, focusing on the state’s duty to protect against human rights abuses, corporate responsibility to respect human rights, and verifying victims’ access to adequate resources.
- 14th United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice (2021). Kyoto Declaration on Advancing Crime Prevention, Criminal Justice and the Rule of Law: Towards the Achievement of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/Congress/21-02815_Kyoto_Declaration_ebook_rev_cover.pdf
- Amnesty International (2021). Human Rights Abuses by Law Enforcement Officials. https://www.amnesty.org/en/what-we-do/human-rights-abuses-by-law-enforcement-officials
- Bassiouni, M. C. (2015). Globalization and Its Impact on the Future of Human Rights and International Criminal Justice. Intersentia.
- Bassiouni, M. C., & Finckenauer, J. O. (2014). Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice. In P. L. Reichel, & J. S. Albanese (Eds.), Handbook of Transnational Crime and Justice (2nd ed., pp. 309-322). SAGE Publications.
- Chai, C. G. (2007). Jurisdição Constitucional em uma Democracia de Riscos. AMPEM.
- Cohen, J., Gyansa-Lutterodt, M., Torpey, K., Esmail, L., & Kurokawa, G. (2005). TRIPS, the Doha Declaration and Increasing Access to Medicines: Policy Options for Ghana. Globalization and Health, 1, Article No. 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-1-17
- El Said, M. (2022). The Impact of “TRIPS-Plus” Rules on the Use of TRIPS Flexibilities: Dealing with the Implementation Challenges. In C. M. Correa, & R. M. Hilty (Eds.), Access to Medicines and Vaccines (pp. 297-327). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83114-1_11
- European Court of Human Rights & Justice (2015). Case of OAO Neftyanaya Kompaniya Yukos v. Russia. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-151234%22]}
- European Court of Human Rights & Justice (2016). Case of Ilias and Ahmed v. Hungary. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-162836%22]}
- European Court of Human Rights & Justice (2019). Case of Navalnyy v. Russia. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-196957%22]}
- Finckenauer, J. O. (2016). Transnational Crime and the 21st Century: Criminal Enterprise, Corruption, and Opportunity. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Human Rights Watch (2021). Corporate Accountability. https://www.hrw.org/topic/business
- Interamerican Court of Human Rights (2017). Case of Gómez Palomino v. Peru. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_334_esp.pdf