Public Governance as a Factor in the Effectiveness of the Constitutional Rules Applicable to State-Owned Enterprises in Brazil
- 1 Doctoral Program in Constitutional Law, Brazilian Institute for Education, Development and Research (IDP), Brasília, Brazil
- 2 Master Business Administration, Brazilian Institute of Capital Markets (Ibmec), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 3 Master’s Program in Public Administration Control, Serzedello Correa Institute (ISC), Brasília, Brazil
Abstract
This article evaluates the constitutional provisions regarding direct state exploitation of economic activity or entrepreneurial state, with a specific focus on the inertia involved in forming and managing state-owned enterprises. It aims to provide a balanced analysis without subjective evaluations. Based on analytical research conducted through document analysis, our objective was to establish a constitutional interpretation that links the collective interest with principle of efficiency, while developing a constitutional filter that is backed by a system of public governance. A filter like this can guarantee that the decision-making process surrounding the establishment, upkeep, or privatization of state-owned enterprises is based on evidence and avoids the political-ideological conveniences that periodically change. The guidelines enhance the constitutional understanding of the matter, providing improved guidance for the exercise of representative democracy when conducting an intertemporal analysis of the entrepreneurial state. This enables a more informed public debate on the nature of the state’s entrepreneurial activity, aligning it with the collective interest.
- Ávila, H. (2005). Teoria dos Princípios: Da Definição à Aplicação dos Princípios Jurídicos (4th ed.). Malheiros.
- Binenbojm, G. (2006). Uma Teoria do Direito Administrativo. Renovar.
- Bovaird, T. (2005). Public Governance: Balancing Stakeholder Power in a Network Society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71, 217-228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852305053881
- Brazil. Federal Court of Accounts (2014). Basic Governance Reference Guide for Public Sector Organizations. TCU, Secretariat of Planning, Governance and Management. https://portal.tcu.gov.br/lumis/portal/file/fileDownload.jsp?fileId=8A8182A253234F6C015333B3DE131B3F
- Brazil. Ministério do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento e Gestão (2016). Perfil das Empresas Estatais Federais. MP/SEST. https://shorturl.at/ciC27
- Carvalho, L. M. (2017). 1988: Segredos da Constituinte. Os Vinte Meses que Agitaram e Mudaram o Brasil. Record.
- Cretella Júnior, J. (1993). Comentários à Constituição de 1988. Forense Universitária.
- Cyrino, A. R. (2016). Até Onde vai o Empreendedorismo Estatal? Uma Análise Econômica da art. 173 da Constituição. In A. S. Aragão (Ed.), Empresas Públicas e Sociedades de Economia Mista (pp. 9-23). Fórum Administrativo.
- Duarte, C. T. P. (2015). Livre Iniciativa e Estado: Em Busca do Equilíbrio Perfeito. Revista do Ministério Público do Rio de Janeiro, No. 58, 111-140. https://shorturl.at/myAD8
- Grau, E. R. (2012). A Ordem Econômica na Constituição de 1988. Malheiros.
- Häberle, P. (2015). Hermenêutica Constitucional—A Sociedade Aberta dos Intérpretes da Constituição: Contribuição para Interpretação Pluralista e “Procedimental” da Constituição. Direito Público, 11, 25-50. https://www.portaldeperiodicos.idp.edu.br/direitopublico/article/view/2353 https://doi.org/10.11117/22361766.60.11.2353
- Hathaway, O. A. (2000). Path Dependence in the Law: The Course and Pattern of Legal Change in a Common Law System. Iowa Law Review, 56, 601-665. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.239332
- Hesse, K. (2004). A Força Normativa da Constituição. Sergio Antonio Fabris.