Survival Clause under the International Investment Treaty Reform: Challenge and Response
- 1 School of Law, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China
Abstract
The survival clause plays a key role in the reform of international investment treaties because it concerns the transition between old and new treaties. The legislative purpose of the survival clause is to provide investors with survival protection and prevent investors’ interests from being affected by sudden changes in policy and investment environment, so as to ensure the stability of investment protection and legal certainty. Over the past decade, many investment treaties have faced termination or been effectively terminated. However, the current rules and practices of survival clauses lack the certainty and consistency, which has caused certain obstacles to the reform of international investment law. Therefore, to study and improve the text of the survival clause will help China to make favorable policy choices on the issue of survival clauses and contribute to the reform of China’s investment treaties.
- Crockett, A. (2015). Indonesia’s Bilateral Investment Treaties: Between Generations. ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, 30, 437-448. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siv003
- Gordon, K., & Pohl, J. (2015). Investment Treaties over Time—Treaty Practice and Interpretation in a Changing World. OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2015/02, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2555606
- Harrison, J. (2012). The Life and Death of BITs: Legal Issues Concerning Survival Clauses and the Termination of Investment Treaties. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 13, 928-950. https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-01306002
- ILC (1966). Yearbook of the International Law Commission 1966 (Vol. II Pt. 1). International Law Commission.
- Lavopa, F. M., Barreiros, L. E., & Bruno, M. V. (2013). How to Kill a BIT and Not Die Trying: Legal and Political Challenges of Denouncing or Renegotiating Bilateral Investment Treaties. Journal of International Economic Law, 16, 869-891. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgt025
- Miron, S. (2014). The Last Bite of the BITs—Supremacy of EU Law versus Investment Treaty Arbitration. European Law Journal, 20, 332-345. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12039
- Pohl, J. (2013). Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions. OECD Working Papers on International Investment, 2013/04, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2366465
- Schlemmer, E. C. (2016). An Overview of South Africa’s Bilateral Investment Treaties and Investment Policy. ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal, 31, 167-193. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siv040
- Shan, W., & Gallagher, N. (2015). Research on Sino-Foreign Investment Treaties. Beijing Law Press.
- Tropper, J. (2020). The Treaty to End All Investment Treaties: The Termination Agreement of Intra-EU BITs and Its Effect on Sunset Clauses. Völkerrechtsblog.
- Tropper, J., & Reinisch, A. (2022). The 2020 Termination Agreement of Intra-EU BITs and Its Effect on Investment Arbitration in the EU—A Public International Law Analysis of the Termination Agreement. The Austrian Yearbook on International Arbitration, 16, 301-340. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783214164997-301
- UNCTAD (2017). World Investment Report 2017: Investment and the Digital Economy. United Nations.
- UNCTAD (2018). IIA Issues Note: Recent Development in the International Investment Regime. United Nations.