Right to Be Forgotten or Right to Know: Brazilian <i>Ratio Decidendi</i>
- 1 Doctoral Program in Constitutional Law, Brazilian Institute for Education, Development and Research (IDP), Brasília, Brazil
- 2 Master’s Program in Public Administration Control, Serzedello Correa Institute (ISC), Brasília, Brazil
Abstract
The cases centered on the applicability of the right to be forgotten bring the fundamental rights of freedom of information and privacy into collision, highlighting the complex task of weighing the values and circumstances at stake. In this context, the article discusses the ratio decidendi of the Brazilian Supreme Court, which provides insight into the right to be forgotten. The protective scope of the right to be forgotten should be limited, particularly in relation to its impact on judicial protection for claims for damages. It should not be used as a measure that could limit the community’s right to access information and preserve its collective memory. The article suggests that Brazilian law tends to prioritize the “right to know” over the right to be forgotten.
- Alexy, R. (2010). The Construction of Constitutional Rights. Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 4, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.2202/1938-2545.1042
- Amorim Filho, A. (2016). Critério científico para distinguir a prescrição da decadência e para identificar as ações imprescritíveis. Revista dos Tribunais, 744, 725-744.
- Barroso, L. R. (2004). Colisão entre liberdade de expressão e direitos da personalidade: Critérios de ponderação: Interpretação constitucionalmente adequada do cídigo civil e da lei de imprensa. Revista de Direito Administrativo, 235, 1-36. http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rda/article/view/45123/45026 https://doi.org/10.12660/rda.v235.2004.45123
- Barroso, L. R. (2005). Temas de Direito Constitucional (Tomo III). Renovar.
- Corte IDH (2010). Caso Gomes Lund e outros vs. Brasil. Sentença de 20 de novembro de 2010. https://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_219_por.pdf
- Halbwachs, M. (2020). On Collective Memory. University of Chicago Press.
- MacCormick, N. (2005). Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning. OUP Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571246.001.0001
- Mendes, G. F. (1994). Colisão de direitos fundamentais: Liberdade de expressão e de comunicação e direito à honra e à imagem. Revista de Informação Legislativa, 31, 297-301. https://www2.senado.leg.br/bdsf/bitstream/handle/id/176193/000487451.pdf?sequence=3
- Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 26, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928520
- Razmetaeva, Y. (2020). The Right to Be Forgotten in the European Perspective. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 10, 58-76. https://sciendo.com/article/10.1515/bjes-2020-0004 https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2020-0004
- Sarmento, D. (2016). Liberdades comunicativas e “direito ao esquecimento” na ordem constitucional brasileira. Revista Brasileira de Direito Civil, 7, 190-232. https://rbdcivil.ibdcivil.org.br/rbdc/article/view/76/70
- Toffoli, D. (2019). Fake news, desinformação e liberdade de expressão. Interesse Nacional, São Paulo, 46, 9-18. https://bibliotecadigital.tse.jus.br/xmlui/handle/bdtse/7624
- Zufall, F. (2019). Challenging the EU’s Right to Be Forgotten: Society’s Right to Know in Japan. European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 5, 17-25. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/edpl5&i=24 https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2019/1/6