Evolution and Impact of Capital Maintenance in UK Company Law
- 1 School of Business and Leadership (SBL), Regent University College of Science and Technology, Accra, Ghana
Abstract
This article explores the intricacies of capital maintenance under UK Company Law, tracing its historical roots, pivotal principles, and the legislative safeguards devised to uphold creditor interests. Originating as a judicial response to the inception of limited liability, the doctrine has matured into a robust regulatory framework central to company operations. Fundamental to this evolution are landmark cases such as Flitcroft’s, which have anchored the principles ensuring corporate solvency and creditor protection. Nevertheless, the dynamic financial landscape presents its own challenges. The downfall of Polly Peck International in the early 1990s stands as a stark testament to the dangers of neglecting these principles, spotlighting the severe repercussions of financial misdemeanours and unchecked expansion. Additionally, with innovative financial instruments, such as convertible bonds and financial derivatives, traditional boundaries between debt and equity are becoming increasingly indistinct. This evolution prompts a critical reassessment of whether existing capital maintenance rules are adequately equipped to navigate the complexities of today’s corporate realm.
- Ahmad, H. (2019, April 25). Determinants of Dividend Policy: A Study about the Impact of Changing Firm Characteristics on Dividend Payout Ratios. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3378495 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3378495
- Aveling Barford Ltd v Perion Ltd [1989] BCLC 626.
- Barclays Bank plc v British & Commonwealth Holdings plc [1996] 1 BCLC 1.
- Brady v Brady [1988] 2 All ER 617 HL.
- Bratton, W. W. (2006). Bond Covenants and Creditor Protection: Economics and Law, Theory and Practice, Substance and Process. European Business Organization Law Review, 7, 39-87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1566752906000395
- Casciani, D. (2012, August 22). How Asil Nadir Stole Polly Peck’s Millions. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-19161940
- Chandler, A. D. (2022). Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Harvard University Press.
- Companies Act 1985.
- Companies Act 2006.
- Dallas, G. S. (2019, October 9). The Role of the Creditor in Corporate Governance and Investor Stewardship. Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/10/09/the-role-of-the-creditor-in-corporate-governance-and-investor-stewardship/
- Davies, P. L. (2010). Introduction to Company Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199207763.001.0001
- Deng, S., & Li, Y. (2023). Creditor Control Rights and Borrower Protection: The Role of Borrower Consent Clause in Private Debt Contracts. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 61, 357-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01151-6
- Financial Times (n.d.). The Rise and Fall of Polly Peck. https://media.ft.com/cms/296755a8-b10c-11df-bce8-00144feabdc0.pdf
- Godwin, A., Lee, P. W., & Langford, R. T. (2021). Chapter 1. Introduction to Technology and Corporate Law. In A. Godwin, P. W. Lee, & R. T. Langford (Eds.), Technology and Corporate Law (pp. 1-19). Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800377165.00007
- Goergen, M. (2012). International Corporate Governance. Prentice Hall.
- Hannigan, B. (2012). Company Law (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199608027.001.0001
- Insolvency Act of 1986.