The Desirability of Application of the Basic Structure Doctrine in Bangladesh: An Introspection of Constitutional Amendments
- 1 Department of Law, Southeast University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Abstract
In Bangladesh, constitutional supremacy prevails by virtue of article 7 and parliament’s constitution amending power is restricted by both precedent and constitutional provision i.e. article 7B. Previously the judiciary of Bangladesh affirmed the doctrine of basic structure as a limitation on the parliament’s power to amend the constitution. But it has been categorically expressed in article 7B which is incorporated in the constitution after the fifteenth-amendment in 2011 that basic structures of the constitution are inviolable. The desirability to use basic structure as a limitation on the amendment power of the constitution by the parliament is well established in Bangladesh. Bangladesh is perhaps the only country in whose constitution it is categorically stated that the basic structure of the constitution cannot be amended. The basic structure doctrine in Bangladesh is not only a judicial precedent but also a constitutional rule.
- Ahmed, K. (2023). Revisiting Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments in Bangladesh: Article 7B, the Asaduzzaman Case, and the Fall of the Basic Structure Doctrine. Israel Law Review, 56, 263-287. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021223721000297
- Alam, S. (1991). The State-Religion Amendment to the Constitution of Bangladesh—A Critique. Verfassung in Recht und Übersee , 24, 209-225. https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-1991-2-209
- Bhuiyan, J. H. (2017). Secularism in the Constitution of Bangladesh. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 49, 204-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1341479
- Billah, S. M. M. (2020). Testing Constitutional Metaphors: Some Insights from Bangladesh. S SRN Electronic Journal , 8 , 3. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3790325
- Chaki, P. (2023). The Basic Structure of the Constitution—A Critical Study. International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, 6, 947-994.
- Choudhuri, A., & Kabra, S. (2017). Determining the Constitutionality of Constitutional Amendments in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh: A Comparative Analysis. NUJS Law Review, 10, Article 669.
- Corwin, E. S. (1914). The Basic Doctrine of American Constitutional Law. Michigan Law Review, 12, 247-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1276027
- Devlin, J. (1993). Toward a State Constitutional Analysis of Allocation of Powers: Legislators and Legislative Appointees Performing Administrative Functions. Temple Law Review, 66, 1205-1268.
- Dixon, R. (2011). Constitutional Amendment Rules: A Comparative Perspective. In Comparati ve Constitutional La w (p. 105). Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Ferejohn, J. (1997). The Politics of Imperfection: The Amendment of Constitutions. Law Social Inqu iry, 22, 501-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1997.tb00881.x
- Gallagher, M. (2012). The Constitution and the Judiciary. In J. Coakley, & M. Gallagher (Eds.), Politics in the Republic of Ireland (4th ed., pp. 72-102). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203982563-3
- Hakim, M. A., & Huque, A. S. (1995). Governmental Change and Constitutional Amendments in Bangladesh. South Asian Survey, 2, 255-270. https://doi.org/10.1177/097152319500200208
- Hoque, R. (2023). The Evolution of the Basic Structure Doctrine in Bangladesh: Reflections on Dr. Kamal Hossain’s Unique Contribution. Indian Journal of Constitutional Law , 10 , 44.