Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Methodological Phases of Civil Procedure and Their Impact on the Evidentiary System: A Comparative Analysis
Law Department of the Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
Law Department of the Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
- 1 Law Department of the Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
- 2 Law Department of the Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Brazil
Beijing Law Review·Volume 15 (2024)·Pages 1758–1770·Published 8 July 2024·DOI10.4236/blr.2024.153100
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to draw a parallel between the methodological phases of the process and the evidential systems, emphasizing the current phase of formalism-valorative, and describing the influence of this methodological phase on the evidential system. It will argue in favor of the judge’s duty to refer evidence to the parties, in the light of the cooperative model, which is an advance on the classic model ( adversarial system ) and the modern model ( inquisitorial system ) of evidentiary initiative.
KeywordsProcessMethodological PhasesEvidential Systems
- Bonavides, P. (2009). Course in Constitutional Law (24th ed., p. 571). Malheiros.
- Bülow, O. V. (2003). Theory of Exceptions and Procedural Presumptions (Translation and Notes by Ricardo Rodrigues Gama). LZN.
- Cadiet, L. (2011). Introduction to the French Civil Justice System and Civil Procedural Review. Ritsumeikan Law Review, No. 28 , 331-393. https://www.ritsumei.ac.jp/acd/cg/law/lex/rlr28/CADIET3.pdf
- Cappelletti, M. (1981). Ideology in Civil Procedure (Translation: Athos Gusmão Carneiro). A JURIS, No. 23, 16-33.
- Cordeiro, A. M. da R. e M. (2007). Good Faith in Civil Law . [1983] 3. Reprint. Almedina.
- Didier Jr., F. (2010). Fundamentals of the Principle of Cooperation in Portuguese Civil Proce dural Law (pp. 97-103). Coimbra.
- Didier Jr., F. (2015). Course in Civil Procedural Law: Introduction to Civil Procedural Law, Gene ral Part and Knowledge Process (17. ed., Vol. 1). Editora Jus Podivm.
- Dinamarco, C. R. (2002). The I nstrumentality of the Process (10th ed.). Malheiros.
- Fazzalari, E. (1965). L’Esperienza del Processo nella Cultura Contemporanea. Rivista di Diritto P rocessuale , 107 ss.
- Ferrajoli, L. (2002). L aw and Reason: Theory of Criminal Guarantee . Revista dos Tribunais.
- Ferrajoli, L. (2004). Diritto e ragione . Teoria del garantismo penale (8th ed.). Laterza.
- Giuliani, A. (1971). Il concett o di prova : Contributto alla logica giuridica (p. 11). Giuffrè.
- Grasso, E. (1966). Collaboration in Civil Procedure. Rivista di Diritto Processuale , No. 21 .
- Greger, R. (2012). Cooperation as a Procedural Principle. Revista do Processo . https://www.academia.edu/2367602/GREGER_Reinhard_Coopera%C3%A7%C3%A3o_como_Princ%C3%ADpio_Processual
- Lacerda, G. (1961). Process and Culture. Revista de Direito Processual Civil, 2, 74-86.
- Lopes, J. B. (2002). Evidence in Civil Procedural Law (2nd ed., p. 20). Revista dos Tribunais.
- Mitidiero, D. (2004). Process and Culture: Praxis, Proceduralism and Formalism in Procedural Law. Cadernos do Programa de Pós- Graduação em Direito - PPGDir /UFRGS, No. 2, 101-128.
- Mitidiero, D. (2015). Collaboration in Civil Procedure — Social, Logical and Ethical Assump tions (3rd ed.). Revista dos Tribunais.